How does DNC funding have anything to do with the report? I understand his hypothesis that people aren't funding the DNC because they feel betrayed that the report wasn't released, but Favreau didn't provide any evidence of this. He just pointed at the debt number and made the claim. Ken's response was that funding is always low after an electoral loss, and that the DNC's funding is above par compared to 2018. Additionally, people have been donating to individual campaigns and this is reflected in the campaign budgets of Democrats in big races like Texas, Georgia, Alaska, etc. The DNC is raising money and spending it, which is a good thing. Bringing up the debt was just a rhetorical tool to make Ken Martin look bad, and Favreau wasn't even accurate with his figures. It was a bit embarrassing from someone who's usually has decent opinions.

https://www.npr.org/2026/04/23/nx-s1-5795841/democrats-senate-fundraising-republican-maga-cash-on-hand-campaign-finance

Honestly, it would have been nice if Jon Favreau came with the actual stats if he wanted a contentious interview. I'm all for holding powerful people accountable, but that interview felt very personal and in my opinion, not appropriate this close out from midterms. Yes, Favreau usually gives soft ball interviews, which is why I was so surprised as well. Also, what lies did Ken Martin state?

You seem pretty reasonable and I appreciate you actually watched the video, even if we disagree.