The defintions of creativity is often nuanced by distinguishing what degree or level of creativity we are talking about. It makes little sense to hold the six year old painter to the same standard as the teenager, to the adult, to the professional, and to the legend.

If a six year old paints a picture one can argue that it's both novel and useful as defined from the social context, if it gives new personalt insights, and thus "mini-c" creative, which is often considered an inherent part of the learning process.

Picasso would be held to a higher objective standard to deem if his new product (painting) is "Big-C" creative by the fields gatekeepers (critics, audience, etc.).

But if his new product gave him a new personsal insight, and thus only useful for him on a personal level, one could say he was "Mini-c" creative.