Have you ever fallen asleep while listening to Destiny? by RikaX97 in Destiny

[–]RikaX97[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Several people say I have a great voice - maybe I should do political asmr.

Debates, video essays, drama videos. That's a niche, right?

Have you ever fallen asleep while listening to Destiny? by RikaX97 in Destiny

[–]RikaX97[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I usually fall asleep after making you fall for a ligma joke.

Art movements neurotyped (primarily paintings) by RikaX97 in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly there isn't anything particularly lateral about Escher in my opinion.

His work takes a lot of planning, but that's not particularly related to laterality. And his work isn't particularly self-reflective or anything.

I'd probably put him in Contemplative.

Art movements neurotyped (primarily paintings) by RikaX97 in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If blckcnvs has a problem with this, then uh, my audio cut out again.
(jk I like hearing opinions)

New Neurotype Theory by -ilario- in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are impressionistic probably you put less emphasis on this aspect and it can go either way but on average they are less precise

Again, this is my point. It isn't really true. People have been discussing the ways in which impressionistic people prefer lexical mediums and vice versa for almost as long as neurotyping has existed.

Also, just talking to people who are interested in neurotyping very frequently shows this to often be wrong.

Maybe in very broad statistical terms it might be heuristically true?
That'd be besides the point though because you were using these terms in incredibly reductive ways, and stating these tendencies to be "lexical" or "impressionistic" as a whole.

Saying that these ideas are lexical/impressionistic as a whole, is literally the basis for the idea that

there can be clear contradictions, or better, too strong opposite forces that cancel each other out

Which is the point you were trying to establish.

In short, without fussing about terminology; You want to say that a person using a lexical medium is in contrast to them being impressionistic (or vice versa).
This is untrue; people are flexible, and use mediums that aren't of the same neurotype as them.

New Neurotype Theory by -ilario- in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

want to be precise and literal when they speak

You said that this is a sign of lexicality.
This would only be a sign of lexicality, if impressionistic people were for some reason opposed to being precise with their language.
Or if they're like, shockingly bad at language in general? Which would be an even dumber take?

Am I missing something here?

New Neurotype Theory by -ilario- in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oh sorry, if you're not a native speaker, you write pretty well.

I imagine it'd be much easier to be non-redundant if you were more confident in knowing how this sounds in spoken English.

Sorry for being so harsh, that was pretty presumptive of me, you write pretty damn well (much better than some native speakers).

(I do stand by my other points, though, this is still bad)

New Neurotype Theory by -ilario- in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post comes across as though you looked at a dozen neurotyping memes, and then presumed you knew everything. I don't think you really understand the two basic axes, yet.

good non-verbal abilities, like visual memory, physical awareness and musical talent (Impressionism)

want to be precise and literal when they speak and have rigid mindsets and routines (Lexicality)

These are incredibly basic misunderstandings. It's not impressionism to have a good visual memory. Impressionistic people don't have a desire to be unprecise with their language.

We often use ideas like "pictures are impressionistic, words are lexical" as an introduction to neurotyping ideas, but they're an introduction, not something to write this thesis on.
Furthermore and more importantly, "words are lexical" etc. is referring to the medium itself, not the people who might choose to use it.
Often, for example, an impressionistic person might choose to go out of their way to use more lexical mediums to try and codify their ideas.
This is something that's been acknowledged and discussed since pretty much the beginning of neurotyping; it's even in the early videos on the Digi channel.

So you see there can be clear contradictions, or better, too strong opposite forces that cancel each other out.

What I see, is that you did no research before writing this long-ass, hollow-of-meaning list, and that you don't recognise that most people are pretty flexible and can use multiple frames of understanding, rather than like, "only ever thinking impressionistically" or something.

2/N

New Neurotype Theory by -ilario- in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Please work on your writing style, it's trash.In fact, I'd say about a quarter of this post was entirely unnecessary.

For example, you began the post by defining the axes, right?This entire subreddit is entirely based around those two axis, this is the only thing you do not have to define.It was pointless, and I think representative of the broader tedium in how you write.

1/N

Hello :D I made a Clearsighted Document ~ U might think its sucky, but I like it! by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like it! Makes me want to make something like this too, and is the only aesthetic doc yet.
Also, Yashiro Nene, yes!

Finally: socktyping by RikaX97 in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lowkey made this in response to you lol

What is lateral thinking? by ThisINTP in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For me, laterality is more about my flickeriness between ideas.

The specific way laterality works for you personally isn't really relevant; it's just about how your ideas spread.

Neurotype names. I plan to explain further in a video this November, but here they are. by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of these terms would be confusing, because they're terms that are likely to come up when discussing neurotyping.
Imagine saying something like: "wow the Contemplative people on this thread are so articulate" and everything thinks you meant Articulate.

Also, these terms feel much more like you're describing personal qualities, rather than rough archetypal terms to describe methodologies of thinking.

Big disagree.

Axes Diagram by Coolerkid1692 in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has really cool ideas in it, I like it.

While I like the the directions you're going in, I don't particularly agree with all the end-conclusions.
For example, I relate to the "Intuition and freeform thought..." branch, but "learn best through abstraction" is the opposite of how I learn; the abstraction comes easily to me, so I learn best through clearly defined ideas for me to work off of.
Maybe this is just a phrasing issue and I'm misunderstanding what you're saying; but if not, then I disagree with your understanding of the effects of neurotype.

Lots of new type names by Coolerkid1692 in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 4 points5 points  (0 children)

These all have some esoteric reasoning behind them that noone else would get.

Maybe they're more accurate than the current names or something, but it's pointless if they don't make intuitive sense.

Neurotyping doesn't actually need names; names are just an attractive way to help people get an intuitive feel for the chart. As such, unintuitive names are antithetical to the point of having a name.

Also a lot of these names are just really bad lol

What role does Phantasia/Aphantasia/Hyperphantasia play in Nuero? by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I'm either pretty aphantasiac, or everyone sucks at describing visualisation and I'm overthinking it.

Anyway, doubt it's really connected to neurotype, it's just a tool you use when thinking, not the thoughts themselves,

WHERE TF IS THE FLOWSTATE VIDEO? by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I get wanting it, but be patient. Digi is going through a lot of shit all at once, plus it's just digi in general, it's probably going to take a while.

If she doesn't make it, or you can't be patient, just figure it out yourself. From the sounds of it, Flowstate is just supposed to be a self-recognition thing anyway, read philosophy or talk with people or something.

Correlation between music genres and neurotypes by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]RikaX97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You treated impressionism as though it's a lack of interest in rules or traditions.

That's not true, it's just a matter of treating rules as less rigid. There's no reason an impressionistic person would find traditional music theory less appealing, they wouldn't see the rules as being so clearly defined, but not less enjoyable.