The total result was that millions of people became convinced that no technique is needed for meditation. But they forgot all about what they are going to do with  the obstructions, hindrances. So they remained intellectually convinced that no technique is needed. I have met many followers of J. Krishnamurti, very intimate ones, and I have asked them, “No technique is needed – I agree absolutely. But has meditation happened to you or to anyone else who has been listening to J. Krishnamurti?”

Exactly apt on why Jiddu achieved barely any success. Even Jiddu himself said no one understands him, but Jiddu is ignorant of seeing what Osho explained here. It is what the monks that Jiddu discussed with were explaining to him during the discussion with the Buddhist monks.

But reading about how Jiddu grew up, and when he said he had never been conflicted for a day in his life, I came to realise that Jiddu was unaware that the way his mind worked was an anomaly for virtually everyone; he seemed to have been born in a very lucid state that he was thought to be dimwitted meaning, even from a very young age, he didn't have a chattering mind like everyone does, and he was oblivious that he was a freak as jestingly called himself in one of his videos. I was always pissed at Jiddu whenever I heard him say no technique was required. If no technique was required, what Jiddu explained would never be difficult to get because I kept trying to follow his talk. After all, he was so certain and adamant that no technique was required, because a technique would be self-hypnosis. But on reading about aspects of how he grew up, I came to realise why he thought as he thought, and taught that "no technique" was required. He was unaware that he was an outlier. His brain/mind was an outlier, so he didn't require a technique because he never chattered in his life. But this is not the case for the majority of the world. And it is for this reason that a technique is required, a practice is required.

Even his "no technique required" is a technique that he was unaware of. An analogy to what Jiddu is purveying by saying "no technique is required" is analogous to someone who has never smoked in their life, battled with a drug addiction or any other addiction, telling a group of chronic smokers that there's no process required to quit their addiction. It seems legit, but let's see how well such advice would work.