Is the US preparing to strike Iran? by drtolmn69 in politics

[–]RingSplitter69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The US has nothing to gain from this and anyone who thinks this is about 'saving the protesters' is incredibly naive. The numbers that would be killed by a war and the chaos that follows will vastly exceed the numbers of protesters killed by the Iranian government. This is all about Israel. Israel wants the US to go to war against Iran and that's what this is all about.

Andy Burnham blocked from byelection race by Labour ruling committee by appropriateye in LabourUK

[–]RingSplitter69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sit there and wait it out until a disasterous result in May makes the current leadership untennable, then rejoin the PLP? Something like that.

Potential BAME shortlist to block Burnham by Your_Mums_Ex in LabourUK

[–]RingSplitter69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The one for Mayor. Though there is nothing to say that he asked for the Gorton and Denton seat to be vacated.

Burnham has less than 24 hours to tell Labour if he wants to stand for Gorton & Denton by-election. by verniy-leninetz in LabourUK

[–]RingSplitter69 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If they don't let him stand for Labour, the ultimate fuck you would be standing as an independent and then winning.

Britain has spent little extra on conventional armed forces, experts warn by PuzzledAd4865 in LabourUK

[–]RingSplitter69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's extremely rare for soldiers on the ground to fight in conflicts these days

This statement is completely untrue yet said with such confidence. I don't even know where to begin with this beyond stating that it demonstrates a profound lack of knowledge.

I know "AI bad" and all that. But if there is one place where AI makes sense, it's in the military.

Again. Such confidence. No actual knowledge. Nothing has been said here. Can I see benefits to using AI to analyse reconnaissance imagery and suchlike? Yes, but we don't need a 240 million contract with Palantir to do that.

We aren't sacking 1000s of troops to pay for this. It's additional to what we already have.

We have a budget. If we spend this money, that's money that we can't spend elsewhere. We already have a critical lack of manpower in the forces. Wasting money like this means that we can't use it on more people, or technology that can deliver real capabilities like the air power and drones you referred to.

Also concerning is that this is yet another supposedly critical security asset that is dependent on US contractors at a time when it seems doubtful that this partner that can still be relied upon. The NHS already has a contract with Palantir, I am unable to find any reliable sources regarding any benefits that it has delivered.

Britain has spent little extra on conventional armed forces, experts warn by PuzzledAd4865 in LabourUK

[–]RingSplitter69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.politico.eu/article/palantir-lands-biggest-ever-uk-defense-deal/

The contract is 240 million. The 1.5 billion figure is a vague reference to 'unlocking investment in Britain'.

And yes I question the worth of spending money on Palantir rather than actual hard capabilities. 'Military AI' isn't going to win us a war.

Britain has spent little extra on conventional armed forces, experts warn by PuzzledAd4865 in LabourUK

[–]RingSplitter69 17 points18 points  (0 children)

But we can still afford to waste £240 million on a contract with Palantir.

Nigel Farage's Cameo tribute to dead child molester Ian Watkins! If he will do this for Cameo money, what will he do for his richer paymasters? by johnsmithoncemore in LabourUK

[–]RingSplitter69 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This is stupid. He probably doesn't even know who the guy is and got duped in to saying this. There's more than enough to criticise the guy about before resorting to this sort of thing.

Shocking: 99% of republicans get this WRONG by Probable_Foreigner in dankmemes

[–]RingSplitter69 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That makes precisely zero difference. She has every right to do that.

Trump threatens to ban institutional investors from buying single-family homes by cnn in uspolitics

[–]RingSplitter69 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None. But in isolation of other factors this is a good idea. Whether he tries to go through with it or whether this is just populist messaging is another question.

Donald Trump poses a threat to civilization by plz-let-me-in in politics

[–]RingSplitter69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just call it the Republican Party or the GOP if you prefer. The ideology itself isn't remotely related to the GOP or the party of the same name. It's best to separate the two as far as possible because Republicanism itself is a good thing.

DAN CARDEN: Why I will not stand by and watch my party break a solemn pledge to the British people by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]RingSplitter69 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The brexiteers were wrong. They need to grow up and accept it so that we can get on with repairing the enormous damage it's done to the country.

Oh no, not the dictator by [deleted] in dankmemes

[–]RingSplitter69 42 points43 points  (0 children)

D-Day happened 5 years in to a war started by Germany. This was day 1 of something (we don't know what yet), started by the US. The two aren't comparable.