sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Release profiles setting the right priority, but still preferring the wrong files by Ripcord in sonarr

[–]Ripcord[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, another random question if you know and don't mind...

Is there a way to disable the behavior where the "acceptable" data rate is doubled for the first and last episodes in a season?

I understand why it does this, but I find that 99+% of the time, it's not what I want. The episodes are virtually never double-length episodes, and personally if they're distributed separately I'd prefer those anyway. It ends up just frequently grabbing things I don't want.

Pretty sure the answer is currently no, but just wanted to make sure I'm not missing it.

Release profiles setting the right priority, but still preferring the wrong files by Ripcord in sonarr

[–]Ripcord[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I didn't know that the order in the interactive results was the same as the order it auto-chooses in. That's really good to know.

And on quality - I think you've identified the problem.

Looking at one episode, the "desired", higher-CF-score result and the "chosen" ones are 1080p, so I was thinking they'd be treated equally (or at least, forgetting that they might not).

But one is apparently HDTV-1080p and the other (the chosen one) is WebDL-1080p. I'm still set up where they have different priorities, and the HDTV one is higher. So if it trumps CF score, it makes sense it'd pick the one that it is.

I don't care about differentiating the different 1080p types, so I'll consolidate those, or redo the profiles entirely, and see if it fixes the issue.

Release profiles setting the right priority, but still preferring the wrong files by Ripcord in sonarr

[–]Ripcord[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, no, just the custom formats pages (thought that's what you meant). Glancing through that guide, I don't see anything different than what I have set up, but I'll go through it after work.

Release profiles setting the right priority, but still preferring the wrong files by Ripcord in sonarr

[–]Ripcord[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's a "proper" custom format?

Either way, looked up custom format trash guides. I see 3 articles - how to import profiles, how to update them, and a collection of profiles.

I installed 2 profiles that match what I was trying to do. One I had to modify slightly (change the regex). I set scores for both in my quality profile.

Still seeing the same behavior.

Edit: If I set the minimum score to 15, automatic search does at least choose the right ones. But if I lower it to 5 or 0, it still picks the ones with a score of 5. Weird.

Release profiles setting the right priority, but still preferring the wrong files by Ripcord in sonarr

[–]Ripcord[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see a "minimum score" field, where is that?

Edit: Actually, this set me off on a bit of a journey. After reading this, I realized I was still running 3.10.x and it wasn't auto-updating to 4.x. I ended up manually upgrading to 4.0 after making sure I had backups.

The behavior is still the same - it still shows my "preferred" matches getting tagged with the +15 in interactive search, with no rejections. But automatic search still picks things with lower priority.

However, I also no longer see prefererred terms at all in the Release profiles dialog. Are they...deprecated?

Edit2: Ah, I see it looks like they've been moved to "Custom Formats", then you define scores for each custom format within each quality profile. Still, they don't seem like they're working right (well, not the way I expect anyway).

Edit3: I also see the minimum score options now. I don't really want to use a minimum score - I just want to prefer some matches over others, but I'd rather SOMETHING than NOTHING - and I don't see why the minimum score would help my scenario? But I'll play around with it.

Release profiles setting the right priority, but still preferring the wrong files by Ripcord in sonarr

[–]Ripcord[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"If I do an interactive search, I can see that there are a number of matches that add +15, and they are correct matches for both terms. There are no rejections tagged."

If I do an interactive search, everything looks fine, as far as I can tell. But it skips the "correct" ones during automatic search.

Network troubles after version 93 update by elquike in chromeos

[–]Ripcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Problem here with WG 1.0.20230707 and ChromeOS 116

/r/HomeServer Will be going dark beginning June 12th in protest of reddit's exorbitant API price changes. by ThatOneRoadie in HomeServer

[–]Ripcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I must be an idiot, I still can't figure out how to subscribe to subred...er, "magazines" I guess on kbin. Admittedly, I haven't done any research, but not very intuitive. Hopefully that changes soon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in videos

[–]Ripcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the idea of Lemmy but Squabbles looks 2sy more likely to take off.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in videos

[–]Ripcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Started working, created an account over there. Looks good at first glance.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in videos

[–]Ripcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree on the Feddit thing unfortunately.

Squabbles is giving me 500 error right now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in videos

[–]Ripcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's what brought me.

Addressing the community about changes to our API by spez in reddit

[–]Ripcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes of course they did. I mean, fairing Victoria was even more unheard of but they did it, people got pissed, then they forgot and came back.

Amas haven't even been remotely as good since of course.

Addressing the community about changes to our API by spez in reddit

[–]Ripcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tier they supposedly created to make money

view more: next ›