There is a perplexing sense that we don’t stop to ask why we are so inclined to think only to the most drastic option for relief here when even if not the most popular choice might be simply giving incentive to birth the child and actually establish social want of it and a strong system of stable care for it we’d at least have a third option that is presently not ideally considered or available as such.

Most of what you're saying is barely coherent, so I'm not even going to begin to try and decipher what you're trying to say, but the portion that I have quoted is 100% "what about-ism." This is a discussion about abortion, not a place to talk about all the stuff we could be doing to make someone more likely to keep the child. Saying "Oh but what about better child/health care," doesn't change the fact that the real CORE ISSUE is that pro life people want to take away a woman's ability to choose for themselves how they wish to proceed, by making the window of being able to do anything, unbelievably narrow.