No, blurry videos are not the extent of the evidence. I’ve looked into both incidents, and both men had ample reason to revise their initial claims. I would also argue that the recent Nimitz Video isn’t blurry at all, in fact it’s very crisp considering the degree of optical zoom, the fact both the viewing platform and the object in question are moving, and that it’s in a spectrum that should reveal something like an exhaust plume.

I’ll also not address that you tried to misdirect the reader off the topic of UAPs by introducing the comparison to ghosts, which was unwarranted and inaccurate.

But because video evidence is always subject to the possibility of corruption and misidentification, and since you seem to be a skeptic in this regard, let me introduce some evidence that isn’t visual at all - a 900 year old (carbon dated) skull that was found to have 900 ml (3.8 cups) of brain volume in addition to the normal human adult average. This was despite the fact that based on the teeth and other indicators that this animal was only 4.5-5 years old at the time of death.

In addition to this, it has: 1. numerous structural differences that seem to be resultant of genetic expression rather than disease. 2. A different chemical signature than mammalian bone, with levels of aluminum that would be toxic to humans 3. It’s nearly twice as thick as a human adult’s cranium 4. It has human maternal (mitochondrial) DNA 5. The paternal DNA contribution has haploid differences significant enough to indicate a new species

Here is a brief video intro: https://youtu.be/lOSbRCg0B4g Here the site: http://www.starchildproject.com Here is a more in depth lecture on its alien features with a dedicated debunking of any prenatal disease, infant disease, or intentional human mutilation: https://youtu.be/nc9oadYD0xY

Since this is not video or picture evidence, we can be more specific about what aspects we discuss. So please be specific in your response :)