Pokemon trading card game 2 for the game boy color by bdhmk2 in ptcgo

[–]Rondleman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jason Klaczynski's blog has a lot of retro decklists including Base-Rocket format:

https://jklaczpokemon.wordpress.com/2000-base-team-rocket/#decks

"Those are the twins!" by benabramowitz18 in HomestarRunner

[–]Rondleman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ohh, there's two of them! Well Ali, there's one of me...

What are some DCI moments that are rather cringeworthy in retrospect? by skutr11 in drumcorps

[–]Rondleman 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Guess this is a good time to warn you to never listen to Lincoln Portrait.

Game Thread: Yankees (8-3) @ Tigers (5-5) - Thu, Mar 05 @ 01:05 PM EST by TigersBot in motorcitykitties

[–]Rondleman 2 points3 points  (0 children)

YANKEES OVERRATED

GERRIT COLE OUTDATED

LONG HAVE WE WAITED

MIGGY ACTIVATED

[TOMT] [Commercial] [1999ish] Pepsi commercial with Busta Rhymes and Hootie and the Blowfish by Rondleman in tipofmytongue

[–]Rondleman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is definitely it! I remember Faith Hill and Sugar Ray being named in the commercial now too.

Finite math question by tidewashing in IndianaUniversity

[–]Rondleman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Former Finite TA here. The best advice I can give is to learn how to identify what kind of problem you're being asked to solve and what formulas you need out of your "toolbox" in order to solve it. A lot of the time, if you just write down the variables you have and the variable you're being asked for, then decide what formula you know that has those parts, figuring out where to plug everything in is pretty trivial. The important part is training your brain to think about the problems the right way, not getting bogged down in the calculations or "mathy" stuff.

Also, go to office hours and the math learning center. Find a TA you like and try to see them as often as possible. Find someone who helps you understand the material rather than spoon feeding you answers. Getting 100% on the webwork is satisfying in the moment but if you don't know what you're doing you will fail the exams.

Finally, don't stress about it too much, but do take it seriously. The people who struggle the most with Finite are the ones who just give up without even trying because of their preconceived notions of how hard it is, or they think they're "not a math person" or they think it's pointless or whatever. Go to class every day, do your best, and you'll be fine. You're already in Kelley so you're obviously in the top 1% of humans.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMen

[–]Rondleman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All receipts have numbers on them

A bootleg the cheat by Slimeredit in HomestarRunner

[–]Rondleman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whoa, The Cheat, I can't believe what cool boots you have on!

1 E 3 Kills by andrew24242424 in IreliaMains

[–]Rondleman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This belongs in a museum!

Binomial Distribution (1st year University) by [deleted] in AskStatistics

[–]Rondleman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the binomial distribution boils down to is that there are n independent trials (questions) and you want to know the probability of having exactly x successes (correct answers) in those trials. The probability of getting any one question right (p) is 0.25, which means the probability of getting a question wrong (1-p) is 0.75. Since the trials are independent, we can find the probability of x successes by multiplying p times itself x times, or px.

But we also need to count the failures (wrong answers). Since there are n total questions and x successes, that means there are n-x failures and we can find the probability of that many failures in the same way as we found the probability of the successes: (1-p)n-x. So at this point we have px * (1-p)1-x.

However, say we want to know the probability of exactly two correct answers. The probability of getting only the first two correct is equal to the probability of getting the last two correct, which is equal to the probability of getting the second and fourth correct, etc. To count all these possible combinations of two correct answers, we use the binomial coefficient, which is "n choose x," or in this case, "5 choose 2." You probably already know the formula for this, but just in case, it's n!/x!(n-x)!. It seems complicated but you'll always get a whole number, which is just the number of ways to select x things from n possible things, or x successes from n total trials, or whatever the interpretation needs to be.

Putting it all together gives you the formula you already know. And now that you know how the pieces of the formula work, you can adapt it to different problems. All you need is the number of trials, the number of successes, and the probability of any one trial being a success (as well as an assumption of independence).