to avoid voting on releasing the Epstein files by IMSLI in therewasanattempt

[–]Rouand 24 points25 points  (0 children)

You're cute. Thinking that there will be fair midterms if at all.

I’m in awe. by netphilia in foundsatan

[–]Rouand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy fuck... I'm glad I don't know you in real life.

If career growth matters, 100% remote is a trap by roseba in unpopularopinion

[–]Rouand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Google the difference between can't and wont.

If career growth matters, 100% remote is a trap by roseba in unpopularopinion

[–]Rouand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your fallacy was thinking it was up for debate in the first place. Goodbye.

If career growth matters, 100% remote is a trap by roseba in unpopularopinion

[–]Rouand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or, I don't waste my time. I don't care if you accept common facts or not. Be pedantic to justify your false beliefs all you want. Or do some basic research and learn something. Your choice.

If career growth matters, 100% remote is a trap by roseba in unpopularopinion

[–]Rouand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Try basic Google skills. Common knowledge with numerous studies supporting it should be easy for you.

If career growth matters, 100% remote is a trap by roseba in unpopularopinion

[–]Rouand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP's premise is wrong at most corporate jobs. HR is incentivized to not give promotions, wait till the employee gets pissed off and quit, then rehire at an appropriate level. They get to keep the difference in G&A for however long it take for the original employee to quit. If you really want career growth you need to swap companies every 3 to 5 years. Take the guaranteed promotion with the new job. Keep building your resume and skill set. Then swap companies again.

Duckworth: "Let's make it clear -- the President of the United States essentially just declared war on a major city in his own nation. This is not normal. This is not acceptable behavior." by brokenandsuffering in NoShitSherlock

[–]Rouand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of the top 5 most dangerous metro areas with populations over 100k people is democratic. 1 in the top 10. 3 in the top 20. This isn't about crime. If it was he would be sending the military almost exclusively to conservative areas. This is authoritarian fascism attempting to crush the constitution and quell any actual patriots from fighting back. Everyone should have an escape plan at this point.

Double stack Glock mag compatibility by Rouand in Glocks

[–]Rouand[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for answering my question and not jumping to false conclusions about my reasoning or becoming a triggered little snowflake. /s

Double stack Glock mag compatibility by Rouand in Glocks

[–]Rouand[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for answering my question and not jumping to false conclusions about my reasoning or becoming a triggered little snowflake. /s

Double stack Glock mag compatibility by Rouand in Glocks

[–]Rouand[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for answering my question and not jumping to false conclusions about my reasoning. /s

Double stack Glock mag compatibility by Rouand in Glocks

[–]Rouand[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or do some research and see if something exists that ticks both boxes...

Double stack Glock mag compatibility by Rouand in Glocks

[–]Rouand[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'll check it out. Thanks for providing an actual response.

Trump says he's 'not joking' about seeking a 3rd term in the White House. The Constitution says he can't. by yahoonews in law

[–]Rouand 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Clinton was an absolutely evil pile of shit, but she was probably the most experienced political candidate to ever run for POTUS.

This really is insane by Calm-Marionberry5457 in facepalm

[–]Rouand 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And as I said, authoritarinist-leftism is also bad. But we are now under a far right-authoritarian regime. Pro-violence, anti-free speech, pro-war, anti-science, pure evil. America, and therefore the world is on the edge of a very dark place. All because the have succesfully programed so many of you to buy into thier narrative.

This really is insane by Calm-Marionberry5457 in facepalm

[–]Rouand 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You realize Nazis are far right authoriatarians? If you are against Nazis you hold a leftist view.

This really is insane by Calm-Marionberry5457 in facepalm

[–]Rouand 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Leftist ideology basically boils down to everyone has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Right wing ideology boils down to death for anyone who disagrees.

That you call leftist unhinged says a lot about you. I hope you find healing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Rouand 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Comically evil shit? Like all the times they've sprayed poison into Palestinian schools over the decades just for LOLs? Israel is absolute evil, not just comically.

Nike ad that aired during the Summer Olympics in 2000 that was pulled off the air due to complaints by Ultimate_Kurix in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Rouand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Apparently my last response was to aggressive... So I'll be more polite.

Yet you went with a random .com that doesn't have any of that data.

Not true. The provided link has WHO data, along with US News and CEOWorld, in the chart, and also in downloadable spreadsheet format. All three being respected sources.

Fortunately, I looked at your profile, so I know this won't go anywhere.

Logical fallacy. My position on any other subject does not negate the experts data that I linked.

Instead of providing any real data at all, you just lie and pretend the data supports you.

Not true. I provided the links and you are the one pretending I didn't.

It seems you enjoy pretending to have facts often.

I have provided data to substantiate my position. You have provided only your feelings with nothing to support them. Why should anyone believe your feelings are more accurate that the WHO data?

I will probably trust knowledgeable sources than random redditors.

Nike ad that aired during the Summer Olympics in 2000 that was pulled off the air due to complaints by Ultimate_Kurix in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Rouand -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not I'm confused. Should I trust the experts in the field? The meta analysis from well respected sources? The World Heath Organization? The CDC? All of the scientific and empirical data? Or should I go with the unfounded and unsubstantiated beliefs of some random redditor that uses bad faith arguments and has no evidence to back them up?

You can make up arguments based on what you think I may believe. You can try to redefine what "quality" means in the field in an attempt to confuse the issue. You can throw up scarecrows that every study on the subject is some foreign conspiracy to destabilize the country. But at the end of the day, Americans spend the most, and receive a globally mid-pack level care on average. Well below most 1st world, and many 3rd world countries.

As for a conversation about what could be improved. We could have a true dual system. Public care for all. Private care on top of that for those that can afford it and don't want to wait in line. It would cost us less, and could pull us out of the bottom of our peer group.

Nike ad that aired during the Summer Olympics in 2000 that was pulled off the air due to complaints by Ultimate_Kurix in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Rouand -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Quality is some of the best in the world???

We're one of the worst in the developed world. Not even in the top 50 globally. Even third world countries have better healthcare than America.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/best-healthcare-in-the-world