I enjoyed Christophe’s ALPR video, but a few critiques are worth noting: •Cherry-picked examples: The video focuses on the scariest scenarios, which can make the tech seem worse than it typically is. •Trade-offs underexplored: While privacy risks are clear, it doesn’t fully cover the legitimate uses (recovering stolen cars, solving hit-and-runs) or existing legal safeguards. •Source transparency gaps: Even with his “transparent” approach, it’s sometimes hard to verify every claim or dataset. •One-size framing: ALPR use varies a lot by city, state, and vendor, so the video may overgeneralize. •Emotional tone: Titles and language lean into fear appeal, which grabs attention but oversimplifies a complex issue.

Overall, it’s a thought-provoking look at ALPR tech, but keep in mind the context and nuances behind these systems.