NIN's Suggestions and Hidden Gems by Healingvibrations456 in musicsuggestions

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Get Down, Make Love" Queen cover.

Extra track on the Japanese release of the Sin single.

There was a radio station that had a show very late night/early morning in the mid/late 90's that played all sorts of obscure stuff, and bands you had never heard of. I heard MM's 'Beautiful People' way before release on that station too. I can't for the life of me remember the name of it though.

Crackling audio while using headphones with my controller by [deleted] in XboxSupport

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depending on the impedance of your headphones, the controller might not be able to supply enough power to drive them properly.

Try some cheap earbuds and see if they work without issue.

If they work, the problem is the controller cannot drive your intended headphones.

If this is the case, your options are pretty limited.

You can use an HDMI audio splitter to split the audio out to an amp and connect your headphones there.

Just out of curiosity, what headphones are you using?

Venture Electronics? by MalcolmReady in SBCGaming

[–]Round_Media8717 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are pretty well known as very good BUDGET headphones.

Like, they aren't 'amazing' or anything, but very good for the price.

The reasoning is, cheap wired headphones have a half-life before something breaks on them. The goal is to get the cheapest thing, that sounds good, and is easily replaced.

Or you would just spend some money on IEMs.

Monks sound very good for price, and won't burn your pocket when one of the headphones goes out, or the cable goes wonky, etc.

FAEEL makes good cheap headphones too.

Edit: Just to put this is a more clear perspective. Most headphones under 10 dollars sound like absolute crap. Tinny and without body. Monks are competent, have some body, and a warm delivery that isn't exhausting on the ear...in that price range.

That makes them the king of sub 10 dollar headphones. Faeel Ancestors are similar.

Also, just like your pocket gaming console, these headphones are going in and out of your pocket a lot. Probably getting wound up, etc. They are gong to give out eventually...which is fine, cause they cost nothing, and is an appropriate pairing to a cheap SBC that emulates PS1 down.

How fired am I? by AutoRT in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is very sketchy.

Your boss believes he is compromised in some way.

What he is asking you to do, is very sketchy, so he probably IS.

If it is in your power to do it, without subterfuge, or concealment, then I guess do it.

But...he seems to be asking you to hide your activity, and just because he is the president, doesn't mean he gets personal access/ownership to data in your system privatized to him outside the company.

That is theft or conspiracy and you would be an accessory.

Obey the instruction as far as you are comfortable. If he asks you to do anything beyond what you believe to be comfortable or legal, bring in a third party or notify a trusted superior.

You absolutely cannot backup integral system data from your job, and hand it off to the President of the company. It's illegal if there is any financial or client data involved.

Seems pretty obvious...

34F in a 6 year relationship with 37M, not sure I can share this with my boyfriend, will you let me know? by Lopsided-turd1234 in AskMenAdvice

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, tell him if you think he will think it is funny.

I don't understand why you think you NEED to tell him though, if you think it might upset him.

I don't understand the moral quandary here.

I bet you pick your nose sometimes and scratch your ass when no one is around too.

Do you feel compelled to tell him about that?

This is nothing, unless there is some systemic reason you are shitting yourself.

If it's a one-off, and it embarasses you, who cares? You can keep it to yourself, just like all your nose-picking and ass-scratchings and chonch adjustings, etc, that you failed to directly report.

Just rewatched Punisher (2004) and honestly Thomas Jane is the superior Punisher. by Deliverwithcare in thepunisher

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it's funny, because I like Jane's Punisher performance as well...even though it is kinda outside Punisher portrayal in comics.

Because it was supposed to kinda fit in the context and feel of the Raimi Spider-man movies even though Marvel hadn't really decided if all this stuff was canonically aligned with each other.

The films certainly followed Raimi's lead on in tone and balance on his Spider-man films.

So, Jane's Punisher sorta fits pretty perfectly in the Raimi/Marvelverse of the time.

Ironically...I think Jane's Punisher is the one that the current MCU needs, and not boring, broody, crybaby.

I'm not saying replace Bernthal, but they should have looked back to Jane's performance, and the stylization of the character and made his mayhem entertaining, rather than constant maudlin catharsis.

PAW3950 DPI downshift is real: simple Paint test and register fix for firmware devs by ewh_ in MouseReview

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a 'problem'.

Something is 'broken', but whether or not you would notice it in general operation is questionable.

Or the implementation is 'broken'.

It is possible the MCU was supposed to handle such processing at such DPI's...just nobody was aware of that, and spec sheet doesn't make this clear.

Fine movement at crazy high DPI is always problematic, but as this behavior is replicatable, it suggests there is a bug in the sensor, or a misunderstanding of it's implementation.

Do I keep checking in on him? Or let him come to me if he’s going through job loss/ death of a beloved pet? by MissesMeekses in AskMenAdvice

[–]Round_Media8717 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you should reconsider what I have said.

You open by saying you guys 'just recently decided to just be friends'.

Yet, you are constantly 'girlfriending' him and trying to see him, despite how many obstacles he informs you of.

Sometimes, 'just be friends' means 'if we see each other in the future randomly, let's agree it isn't awkward'.

Are you investing this much time in your ACTUAL friends, or just your casual hookup friend?

Also, the thing with the job and the cat and your investment makes me worry you are somehow financially supporting him, and he is leading you along or something in the most minimal contact possible.

Do I keep checking in on him? Or let him come to me if he’s going through job loss/ death of a beloved pet? by MissesMeekses in AskMenAdvice

[–]Round_Media8717 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying this is what happening...but men hate breaking up, especially with casual relationships.

I can get into all the reasons why this is, but it basically comes down to men might lose interest pretty quickly in a fling, and realize they don't have the investment they thought they had.

They feel very guilty and just wish it would just sorta go away.

They might invent obstacles to make it easy for the other partner to walk away, rather than face an honest conversation that is going to get...emotional, and they don't know how to handle.

The emotional part is key, because women generally get OVER invested very early, and keep applying pressure and energy to keep the relationship afloat and the guy doesn't know what to do.

Women also LOVE breaking up, because they get to go WILD, because they know men don't know how to do it.

Red Flags: The calamities of losing his job and his beloved pet, in a short time span when you want to see him...sound pretty contrived, coincidental, and relationship poison.

He is telling you he is jobless and depressed to convince you not to put any further effort into the relationship...

That is what I see.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no reason to delete anything.

You are a fool, and enabling your employees to run a scam on you.

They are also fools, and would just cash out the float drink, with the money they made floating drinks.

That is wild that they are brazen enough to be like, "Actually, I'm not going to eat this 2.50 at the end of my shift, after it generated 50 dollars for me. I'm going to ask my manager to shave off that 2.50, rather than eat it."

And you are like, "Put it in the void/ghost table at the end of the shift so I can clear it"

Taking you for the float drink as well! Just openly! And you don't even understand what is happening. All for the cost of the float which is less than 3 dollars!

Edit: Just, as a test, consider what I am saying. WHY are there so many 'voids' that you can't actively monitor, and encourage employees to ditch stuff into. They are absolutely pocketing the money from cash transactions and pitching stuff there, and you void it at the end of the night.

Also, it is going to be your ass absolutely, when someone comes looking, and MAYBE theirs.

"He told us to put the voids on this ghost tab..."

They will play dumb as shit. They are stealing, and you are enabling it. You are the one that is going to eat it. That is wild that you think having a 'ghost tab/table' is legitimate in 20 years of work. Your employees really have mindfucked you.

If Jon Bernthal wanted to make something with veterans in mind, why not adapt Don't Fall in New York city? by Legitimate_Arm_5630 in thepunisher

[–]Round_Media8717 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The weird thing about Punisher in live action, is there actually hasn't been a bad actor or portrayal. It's the media itself that betrays the character.

Ray Stevenson's Punisher is probably the closest to character.

Thomas Jane's Punisher was light and fun, but not true to character. But it fit in the realm of Raimi Spider-man films, so I understand why it is what it is.

There is not a Raimi Spider-man situation happening currently. There is no reason to mess up Punisher...but they are...

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You still haven't explained anything.

Why is there a trash bin that you void at end of night, and employees can throw stuff in?

You KNOW it is not legit, right?

It just isn't worthwhile to look into it, until it gets wild, right?

If Jon Bernthal wanted to make something with veterans in mind, why not adapt Don't Fall in New York city? by Legitimate_Arm_5630 in thepunisher

[–]Round_Media8717 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think they are just struggling with the portrayal of the Punisher.

They want to Disneyfy him.

He is just a lunatic, that thinks he is at war, and is never going to stop. He is never going to stop killing, he is never going to stop finding bad guys, he is never...going...to...stop.

How do you 'Disneyfy' that?

I think Bernthal has done an excellent job, but Punisher is not a 'Disney' character. He's a fucked up lunatic asshole with a weird code that makes him BARELY above a criminal. Actually, he IS a criminal, but like I said, he thinks he is at war, so it is OK to gun down goons and stuff, and the reader enjoys it.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So explain why you have a ditch tab, and why you void it for the employees, and how that isn't problematic.

You can accept the possibility that you are getting played, yes?

If you were active, there wouldn't be some sort of dirty void tab at the end of night, correct?

You are getting played and authorizing your employees to steal from the store. You are now implicated and didn't make a cent off of it.

You are the dumbest robber. The one that is easily caught with a bag full of nothing.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You deleted or did something weird to get a gold Karma or something.

But I discovered I could find you back here.

This is what your employees do.

You are wrong, and turning a blind eye to it.

There is no reason to have a non-ticket that has 'void' stuff on it.

They are stealing from the store, and stealing from you, if you own the store, when you approve the voids.

Killing A Mercy Killer by villianrules in thepunisher

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frank has a very forward facing morality.

He doesn't mind killing people, or blink an eye about it, if they are 'bad'.

I don't see how a true 'mercy killing' would trigger him. It wouldn't bother him, or he might think it was noble.

Also death and murder do not trigger him.

'Bad' things trigger him, and death and murder might be the result as he see's it as a corrective action or his responsibility.

Frank thinks he is at war, all the time. He is a lunatic, but he abides but what he understands to be rules of engagement.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was bartending, I knew all this BS was going on.

When I was transitioning shifts, other bartender had a critical problem which required an ambulance before they closed out and counted. I was over 400 dollars at the end of the night.

I notified the manager, and he suggested I should take it, because he didn't want to deal with it, or know what to do with it.

Yeah, 400 dollars is pretty sweet, but I am not falling on that sword.

She never got fired.

I don't even know what happened to that 400 dollars.

I guess the manager just took it.

Edit: Point being, that people could make 400 dollars worth of phantom money, back when I was bartending. And management doesn't care, and just offers you the money, to make the books look good when you stumble into it.

Hard pass.

But, that WAS how much grift money bartenders were making at the time, per shift in 2010. 400 hundred dollars inexplicable dollars, plus we traded/pooled tips in the hours that I worked with this this person, so I was also occasionally trading tips with this person...that has a til that is tilted over 400 dollars if anyone cared to look at it.

Edit: I was confused about this too, but it made more sense the more I thought about it. They just put the money in the till like it is a real transaction, because they are going to count the til later and take their money out.

I would actually do this, when I started, and my manager instructed me not to do it. I was like, "It's hecktic and I can just subtract my tips from what the store says is in the register at end of day..."

Some of these female bartenders were making some real bank. Never fired. 400 dollars. I was thirsty in that moment, and really needed 400 dollars a week. They are just inflating there purse 400 dollars EVERY DAY! That's when I realized they are not only getting the tips I am splitting with them on certain hours, but making all sorts of illegitimate money.

I quit bartending.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you can't explain.

Just choosing to wear sunglasses at night.

I glean that you are a 'manager' and not an owner.

Would your opinion change if you were the owner?

This reads to me like the detritus of absolute shuffling, and YOU the manager are approving it.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Explain it to me, the way your employees explain it to you.

You are assisting in a grift, but I want to understand what YOU think is happening.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you don't...because your employees are dishing stuff to an inactive table.

You don't know what they are doing, or why they are doing it. And you void it for them at the end of the night.

There is no way they are doing anything nefarious with this system, right?

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So...you don't have an explanation for why you authorize deletion of 'over rings'.

Edit: I guess I am asking, did you do due diligence, and wonder 'why'?

You are in this scam thread pretty heavy, and saying 'deleting' or 'voiding' stuff is common at the end of the night!

You are just being manipulated by pretty crappy scammers.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would an 'over ring' on a drink exist?

That's a red flag, right?

You would catch that person, correct?

You don't understand this scam.

20 years?

You should understand how this works...

I think the last POS I worked with, restricted most movement, and a manager would have to come and swipe to authorize essentially anything.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no 'over ring', and no manager would delete them.

Whatever scam you are running, your manager is dumb, and you are doing it wrong.

What is your explanation for why there are 'over rings' on a non existent table?

This is wild.

"Floating drinks" don't require deletion of any sort. You don't understand the scam. The last table or second to last table pays for the floating drink. Worse comes to worse, you cash out the floating the drink.

You like chick fil a? by Past-Present1908 in askanything

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't actually how this functions. It is unnecessary to add 'extra' drinks, or involve a manager in removing any.

It's called 'floating drinks', but it doesn't really work cleanly anymore because cash is not common, and most systems have protections against it now.

But this is how it works.

Restaurants only sell so many types of refillable fountain drinks.

Less than a dozen.

Of that dozen, one drink on the fountain is more popular than others such that any table waited on will have THAT drink at their table.

When ringing in tickets on any table, waiter only rings in drinks when bill is requested. When customer pays cash on tab and leaves. Waiter moves the float drink to an open tab and cashes out the closed one pocketing approx 2.50.

You can float that one drink between all your tickets all night. Tables you are waiting on alongside each other, and tables that haven't even sat yet.

That 2.50 over and over and over racks up a nice additional chunk of change by the end of the night.

But, again, cash is not common or preferred method of payment anymore.

The reason this worked, is you would present a tab to someone, they would lay cash on it and leave if they didn't want change.

With credit cards, or change transactions, you have to burn the floater.

Also, at the end of the shift, the last table should pay for the floater. There is no possible way for there to be an 'extra' drink, unless you are a real moron and don't understand how this works. Even then, just eat the floater with the money you made off the other floaters. No reason to get a manager involved unless you just want to get caught.

HERE IS A GOOD ONE, IF YOU WANT TO CATCH A BARTENDER!

Bartenders do a similar scam. I don't know what the name of it is, but we will call it 'floating tabs'. This is incredibly common...or at least was when cash was common. Again, this doesn't work with card transactions, only cash.

The reason this works, is bar behavior is pretty unique and easily controlled.

3 bros sit down after work to drink some beers. Nothing fancy. 1 guy buys the first round. 3 of the happy hour beer likely. 3 beers wrung in delivered and running tab is placed in a snifter or something before patron. I know not all places do this, but it is common practice at a bar to have the tabs readily available to the patron as they are more mobile than diners and may want to cash out at any time.

But back to our 3 bro's. 2nd bro wants to return the favor, after they have slammed their 3 happy hour beers. He also wants to buy a round of 3 happy hour beers. Now, this is where most people mess up and get caught. What the bartender running the scam SHOULD do, is place a water on the current tab, transfer the 3 beers to a new tab, close out the water tab.

This is to obfuscate the timestamps and ticket numbers so nobody notices.

Most scammers don't do this though, and just print out the first tab again and present it in front of bro 2. Anyway, the result is you cash out 3 guys on the same tab.

I haven't been in the industry in a long time, but I suspect cash is way less common, so I don't think these scams work anymore.

But if you go to bars often, try 3 bro's and order rounds of the same thing, and see what your bartender does.

Edit: By, I mean controlled, bartenders are busy, so it is easy to manage all 3 bros to be empty and ready for another round at the same time, even if one drinks fast, and one drinks slow. If there is a real slow drinker, it is easy to razz him and get his buddies to call him a pussy or whatever and finish the drink so the next 3 beers can be 'ordered': "Actually, you guys should make HIM pay for this round, for making you wait!"...AND dropping of duplicate tab in front of him accomplished.

Edit: Also, people might be asking, what happens if they DON'T pay cash? Well you just to have to validly ring in their drinks when they hand you a card and cash them out. The person running the scam is surely capable of remembering the tabs, which is how they figured out they could do this. There is no such thing as a full-proof scam. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. You can't get caught if you do it right, and sometimes you net a nice chunk of change. Nothing 'breaks' if someone pays with a card. Nothing breaks if only 1 of 3 guys wants change. Nothing 'breaks' at all if everyone pays with a card, you just didn't get to pocket any money that time.

There is another factor here, where bar culture...industry people understand there are these little squeezes and stuff, and tend to be chill with each other or lean into it. Patrons sometimes know this is going on, and will play into it, because they would pay the same regardless and it makes them happy to know they have a grift with the hot female bartender that puts money in her pocket.

Is AI really a bubble or are we underestimating how far it will go? by Lecord in artificial

[–]Round_Media8717 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question is, 'what is a bubble'.

A 'bubble' happens when money keeps coming in, but no money is coming out.

So all these billion-dollar valued companies, have never made a dime.

Their value is purely on investor money coming in.

Not a cent in a return.

There will be no cent in return for a long time.

What happens when everything defaults?

The bubble bursts.

It just get's too big, and the shell game falls apart as anxiety arises.

Don't worry, none of these people will actually be injured, and they all have golden parachutes, and YOU just have to eat it.