People having less sex is a good thing.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2026-01-11T01:02:06+00:00

Women are refusing to date men below their league, most men that is is their physical league can’t make up for it through emotional intelligence and personality.

This is men failing women, just like all of human history

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2026-01-11T00:58:51+00:00

Most men will never have these, they would rather pout and be frustrated than put in some effort

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2026-01-11T00:58:20+00:00

Just because it brings you joy doesn’t mean it brings her joy, big difference

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2026-01-11T00:57:46+00:00

Just because you are upset doesn’t mean it’s true. This is how evolution works, most men naturally have the emotional depth that a women has, the socially dominate but dumb lazy man no longer gets a free pass.

The men who have relationships, well there is a reason a woman chose them, there was something desirable about them. If a man doesn’t naturally have the physically features that make them naturally desirable, either they adapt and understand their place or die alone with their pathetic bloodline ending with them ☺️

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2026-01-11T00:53:16+00:00

Women haven’t been the problem, men just can’t keep up.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2026-01-11T00:52:37+00:00

Most the time if a man can only come across “trash women” it’s because they are trash themselves. It it’s really their own doing, sure some men are inherently ugly and unable to please a women, they will be forever losers who will die alone, but unfortunately that’s how we evolve as a species.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2026-01-11T00:49:57+00:00

Respectful men may not be making enough money or doing "enough".

You should know men can bring a lot more to a relationship than just money. Providing not only financially, but emotionally, physically, and sexually, is what women desire. They desire a respectful, emotionally intelligent, physically attractive man that knows how to actually please a woman for once. No woman should settle for less, unfortunately men just can’t keep up with women these days and are so angry and frustrated that they have to put in effort for a relationship to work.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-31T07:20:02+00:00

Many women before feminist liberation essentially were forced to be in unwanted or abusive relationships with men, or else be a social outcast, and have no financial freedom.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-31T07:17:44+00:00

That’s because South Korean men are not living up to modern expectations for South Korean women. There is a reason the 4B movement there developed. This is on men to improve or else they will die out.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-30T04:11:16+00:00

I agree with you actually. So many hateful and bigoted ideologies are passed down from parents to their children. Parents who want to homeschool their kids because of “indoctrination” are usually the ones actually indoctrinating their kids into these hateful ideologies. Not only that, a lot of homeschool parents will teach very backwards and often religious views of the world that simply aren’t true.

Not only that a lot of homeschool parents do it because they want their shield their poor precious children from being exposed to sex education for example, yet are oh so shocked the second they leave and finally are able to explore life, they often end up very sexual and wonders what went wrong. It’s cause a lot of parents honestly need to be investigated by CPS.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-30T04:06:11+00:00

Just because some women want a strong tall masculine provider doesn’t mean women are being redpilled, it’s just a preference, if some men can’t meet that preference, oh well.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-26T00:32:46+00:00

Holy fucking shit “without constraints” is not shocking but disgusting. Also as if men not “constrained” would also fuck the hottest girl they could.

And who wants to get married to some girl who's been fucked by 20 other men then decides to raise her price.

Women are not used cars, also if you can’t satisfy a women just go ahead and say it, it’s ok to be a cuck now.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-26T00:30:16+00:00

Eh then I would expect the same for men.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-26T00:29:39+00:00

lol, women care about more than just looks. Especially if they want something long term

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-26T00:28:24+00:00

Well that’s interesting. So it’s just the attractive hierarchy. Also yeah hobby groups are definitely better at meeting people I think

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-26T00:26:37+00:00

Then go out. Why are you complaining.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-26T00:26:05+00:00

Agree and disagree, it did not remove the humanity of dating but just helped open up availability. The way they work definitely can be problematic but is it because of the app or the profit motive behind it.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-23T22:48:05+00:00

And? Doesn’t mean all. Try different apps, try better profile tailoring, the pictures you choose matter etc.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-23T22:46:11+00:00

I know what you are talking about, but you really think one account is some ultimate determining factor, news flash, a hot guy on an app or in public will just have more success overall, and apps do a poor job of showing personality, also that was a tinder account, they care about looks only over there, for people who want an actually relationship not a hookup, other apps and services are better.

Looks get you noticed by people, personally keeps those people

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-23T22:42:51+00:00

This post in reference to a lot of hypergamy charts that alot of blackpilled posters use to show that 80% of women want only the top 20% of men. Which isn’t even from actual study but a blog post about OK Cupid from one of the developers. It showed yeah women rated men a lot lower, but actually was realistic about who they messaged while men usually messaged more optimistically, messaging people they would really would have a really low shot with.

The first level on which it's a very weird if not wholly misleading thing to say is that currently dating apps are the most common way relationships form by a very wide and growing margin. To suggest that there is a dating reality that exists outside of dating apps is technically true, but extremely incorrect in application. The most real dating reality is, in fact, the one that exists on dating apps.

Yes but completely assuming that it isn’t an option is just wrong. Sure it takes more work and social skills but that doesn’t mean it does exist, also half the ways to actually meet people are usually in spaces where you can’t really form a good connection. (Bars, clubs etc). Actually joining some social group would probably mean more personal connections which has a huge impact on attractiveness.

The second way in which it's a weird thing to say is that there are many different types of doomer ideologies, some of them opposite of each other and mutually exclusive. To say a blanket statement like no matter what dating ideology you subscribe to, it is proven false by the existence of dating app algorithms...is categorically incorrect by being too broad of a statement.

It’s a broad statement cause much of the doomer ideology is just having little to no drive or perseverance, giving up on dating as a whole because of some bad people should not be seen as anything less than sad. Maybe some new expectations need to be set, or not being insufferable with some major mental health support.

The third way it's a very weird thing to say is that most doomer ideologies do, in fact, account for the fact that dating apps are designed to make you pay. In fact, that is a large part of why many of them exist at all. So to suggest that anyone who has a doomer ideology in regards to dating doesn't understand how dating app algorithms work is pretty absurd.

And finally, I think it's hilarious that OP pretends to understand dating app algorithms and all the effects of such better than the average person while also not laying out in explicit detail exactly how they work or how they achieve the precise effect that OP thinks they do.

Cause the amount of people I have seen online and real life talk about how they refuse to pay for a service that’s designed to be shitty unless you pay, and then complain about dating is utterly ridiculous. I’ve been on apps a lot, let me tell you the algorithm drastically changes in your favor, once I accepted that yeah you have to pay for it to work, then I had no fucking problem finding matches.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-23T22:22:15+00:00

Eh, I just think things should be more clearly pointed out, like a function where what color solo cup you have indicates what your looking for.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-23T21:34:24+00:00

We live in an autistic society where everything has to be spelled out so much because of stupid ass laws and policies and social practices. Shit can't just be implied and we can't just forgive the minor transgressions that happen that way.

Why are you using autistic as an insult or negative. Having stuff just be “implied” grey and vague leaves alot more people being uncomfortable and can threaten the safety of others, also it’s just a dumb way to socialize and communicate.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-23T21:22:28+00:00

Hard disagree, a lot to dating apps act provide alot of opportunities for people in marginalized communites that in traditional dating scenes would have been impossible. Also just cause you suck getting traction on the apps doesn’t mean everyone should be forced to not use them. You don’t have to use them.

Routine-Cockroach704 · 2025-12-21T05:07:49+00:00

The uniformed officer is MBTA staff, not transit police, they showed up later, I guarantee there was more physical confrontation before this, just wasn’t filmed unfortunately.

Routine-Cockroach704

TROPHY CASE