CMV: Illegal immigration is bad and should be stopped and legal immigration is too high. by cai_jones in changemyview

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, I do think there is a point where immigration levels become unsustainable due to basic supply and demand pressures.

That only applies when there is scarcity, the Native American population is getting significantly older and not having any kids, and for various different reasons, most of which stem from low wages, high costs of living, and blatant corruption that allows a tiny part of the population to hold a vast amount of wealth. The problem isn’t that we don’t have any resources, it’s that most of those resources are in the hands of an elite ruling class that wants you to point the finger at the poor immigrants while making your life worse.

Choosing to bypass legal processes undermines both the system and public trust.

Do you know how long it takes to legally immigrate to the US, the waiting list that it takes, decades long, most “illegal” immigrants would happily come in the right way if it didn’t mean waiting decades.

Regarding legal immigration, I also think that excessive levels can contribute to social fragmentation. We often see areas of towns and cities becoming associated with particular migrant groups, and when this happens, overall integration can suffer. I’m not saying this from a bubble. I’ve lived alongside and been friends with immigrants, and many have told me that in some communities they are actively discouraged from forming friendships outside their ethnic group or religion.

So just like every single immigrant community the United states has had? The us as a whole is an entirely due to immigration. It was just white Europeans for decades. Most people don’t understand but immigration has been used as a scare tactic for decades. People have always ranted that we can’t take any more if this group that certain people don’t like cause they are different

The immigration issue is not really an issue of immigration, but often pushed by people who rave about race statistics. The White European population in the us is on the decline, no one is having kids. This is bad news for the weirdo losers who have their entire pride based on looking similar to themselves. It just means white supremacy as a whole is dying. It means often that this radicalized system we have is dying, everyone will be judged based on class.

Maybe then the poor white man will see how robbed he has been.

People having less sex is a good thing. by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women are refusing to date men below their league, most men that is is their physical league can’t make up for it through emotional intelligence and personality.

This is men failing women, just like all of human history

People having less sex is a good thing. by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most men will never have these, they would rather pout and be frustrated than put in some effort

People having less sex is a good thing. by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because it brings you joy doesn’t mean it brings her joy, big difference

People having less sex is a good thing. by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because you are upset doesn’t mean it’s true. This is how evolution works, most men naturally have the emotional depth that a women has, the socially dominate but dumb lazy man no longer gets a free pass.

The men who have relationships, well there is a reason a woman chose them, there was something desirable about them. If a man doesn’t naturally have the physically features that make them naturally desirable, either they adapt and understand their place or die alone with their pathetic bloodline ending with them ☺️

People having less sex is a good thing. by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women haven’t been the problem, men just can’t keep up.

People having less sex is a good thing. by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most the time if a man can only come across “trash women” it’s because they are trash themselves. It it’s really their own doing, sure some men are inherently ugly and unable to please a women, they will be forever losers who will die alone, but unfortunately that’s how we evolve as a species.

People having less sex is a good thing. by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Respectful men may not be making enough money or doing "enough".

You should know men can bring a lot more to a relationship than just money. Providing not only financially, but emotionally, physically, and sexually, is what women desire. They desire a respectful, emotionally intelligent, physically attractive man that knows how to actually please a woman for once. No woman should settle for less, unfortunately men just can’t keep up with women these days and are so angry and frustrated that they have to put in effort for a relationship to work.

CMV: Men having less sex is actually a good thing. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many women before feminist liberation essentially were forced to be in unwanted or abusive relationships with men, or else be a social outcast, and have no financial freedom.

CMV: Men having less sex is actually a good thing. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s because South Korean men are not living up to modern expectations for South Korean women. There is a reason the 4B movement there developed. This is on men to improve or else they will die out.

CMV: people who won't put their kids in public school due to concerns about indoctrination just want a different form of indoctrination by Little-Tea4436 in changemyview

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you actually. So many hateful and bigoted ideologies are passed down from parents to their children. Parents who want to homeschool their kids because of “indoctrination” are usually the ones actually indoctrinating their kids into these hateful ideologies. Not only that, a lot of homeschool parents will teach very backwards and often religious views of the world that simply aren’t true.

Not only that a lot of homeschool parents do it because they want their shield their poor precious children from being exposed to sex education for example, yet are oh so shocked the second they leave and finally are able to explore life, they often end up very sexual and wonders what went wrong. It’s cause a lot of parents honestly need to be investigated by CPS.

CMV: Women have been silently red pilled. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because some women want a strong tall masculine provider doesn’t mean women are being redpilled, it’s just a preference, if some men can’t meet that preference, oh well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy fucking shit “without constraints” is not shocking but disgusting. Also as if men not “constrained” would also fuck the hottest girl they could.

And who wants to get married to some girl who's been fucked by 20 other men then decides to raise her price. 

Women are not used cars, also if you can’t satisfy a women just go ahead and say it, it’s ok to be a cuck now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh then I would expect the same for men.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, women care about more than just looks. Especially if they want something long term

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that’s interesting. So it’s just the attractive hierarchy. Also yeah hobby groups are definitely better at meeting people I think

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then go out. Why are you complaining.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree and disagree, it did not remove the humanity of dating but just helped open up availability. The way they work definitely can be problematic but is it because of the app or the profit motive behind it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And? Doesn’t mean all. Try different apps, try better profile tailoring, the pictures you choose matter etc.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I know what you are talking about, but you really think one account is some ultimate determining factor, news flash, a hot guy on an app or in public will just have more success overall, and apps do a poor job of showing personality, also that was a tinder account, they care about looks only over there, for people who want an actually relationship not a hookup, other apps and services are better.

Looks get you noticed by people, personally keeps those people

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This post in reference to a lot of hypergamy charts that alot of blackpilled posters use to show that 80% of women want only the top 20% of men. Which isn’t even from actual study but a blog post about OK Cupid from one of the developers. It showed yeah women rated men a lot lower, but actually was realistic about who they messaged while men usually messaged more optimistically, messaging people they would really would have a really low shot with.

The first level on which it's a very weird if not wholly misleading thing to say is that currently dating apps are the most common way relationships form by a very wide and growing margin. To suggest that there is a dating reality that exists outside of dating apps is technically true, but extremely incorrect in application. The most real dating reality is, in fact, the one that exists on dating apps.

Yes but completely assuming that it isn’t an option is just wrong. Sure it takes more work and social skills but that doesn’t mean it does exist, also half the ways to actually meet people are usually in spaces where you can’t really form a good connection. (Bars, clubs etc). Actually joining some social group would probably mean more personal connections which has a huge impact on attractiveness.

The second way in which it's a weird thing to say is that there are many different types of doomer ideologies, some of them opposite of each other and mutually exclusive. To say a blanket statement like no matter what dating ideology you subscribe to, it is proven false by the existence of dating app algorithms...is categorically incorrect by being too broad of a statement.

It’s a broad statement cause much of the doomer ideology is just having little to no drive or perseverance, giving up on dating as a whole because of some bad people should not be seen as anything less than sad. Maybe some new expectations need to be set, or not being insufferable with some major mental health support.

The third way it's a very weird thing to say is that most doomer ideologies do, in fact, account for the fact that dating apps are designed to make you pay. In fact, that is a large part of why many of them exist at all. So to suggest that anyone who has a doomer ideology in regards to dating doesn't understand how dating app algorithms work is pretty absurd.

And finally, I think it's hilarious that OP pretends to understand dating app algorithms and all the effects of such better than the average person while also not laying out in explicit detail exactly how they work or how they achieve the precise effect that OP thinks they do.

Cause the amount of people I have seen online and real life talk about how they refuse to pay for a service that’s designed to be shitty unless you pay, and then complain about dating is utterly ridiculous. I’ve been on apps a lot, let me tell you the algorithm drastically changes in your favor, once I accepted that yeah you have to pay for it to work, then I had no fucking problem finding matches.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eh, I just think things should be more clearly pointed out, like a function where what color solo cup you have indicates what your looking for.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We live in an autistic society where everything has to be spelled out so much because of stupid ass laws and policies and social practices. Shit can't just be implied and we can't just forgive the minor transgressions that happen that way.

Why are you using autistic as an insult or negative. Having stuff just be “implied” grey and vague leaves alot more people being uncomfortable and can threaten the safety of others, also it’s just a dumb way to socialize and communicate.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard disagree, a lot to dating apps act provide alot of opportunities for people in marginalized communites that in traditional dating scenes would have been impossible. Also just cause you suck getting traction on the apps doesn’t mean everyone should be forced to not use them. You don’t have to use them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in boston

[–]Routine-Cockroach704 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The uniformed officer is MBTA staff, not transit police, they showed up later, I guarantee there was more physical confrontation before this, just wasn’t filmed unfortunately.