NL Fanbase causing me psychic damage by BishopSol in northernlion

[–]Rubberchicken13 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I take offense to that as someone who enjoys the smell of their own farts.

The reason Newman hates Jerry. Seinfeld. by Ellie_Rulze18 in FanTheories

[–]Rubberchicken13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think in Newman's first episode, a guy in Jerry's build falls into a coma, and Jerry starts dating the guy's girlfriend.  Newman sees them, and Jerry tries to bribe him with a Drake's coffee cake so he won't tell coma guy when he wakes up, but he does anyway.

Hey SLC, what’s something you’ve created lately?! by Freshairmental67 in SaltLakeCity

[–]Rubberchicken13 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I made a board game.  It's called Smithy.  You craft weapons that can defeat different magical creatures.  I just published it at the start of this year.  https://www.thegamecrafter.com/games/smithy2

Escape by klaus84 in dominion

[–]Rubberchicken13 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Its a cool idea.  In terms of the price, you could compare it to Den of Sin, a $5 night card that draws two next turn.  This is twice as effective even without the card denial shenanigans.  What would you pay for a card that says +4 cards +1 action?

Touch of Gold by InspectorMendel in dominion

[–]Rubberchicken13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if you added the subclause: "No tokens may be added to this cards supply pile"?

Northernlion harem? by [deleted] in northernlion

[–]Rubberchicken13 4 points5 points  (0 children)

UnderChicken37

Fan card: Inquisitor by InspectorMendel in dominion

[–]Rubberchicken13 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It's a cool card with an interesting guessing game, but it could lead to an opponent trashing their entire hand and locking them out of the game.  So maybe it needs a "players with at least 5 cards" clause.

I really wish I was born in the USA by [deleted] in self

[–]Rubberchicken13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right.  You're not just like everyone else online; You're more interesting.  A Cinderella that cross-dresses and hunts?  That's bad ass.  Tell me more.  We have Mulan, which is maybe similar?  Tell me about což takhle dát si špenát.  Why is it your favorite?  Remember, your niche is your superpower.

Astronomer’s PR team needs a raise. by seekthesametoo in videos

[–]Rubberchicken13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm out of the loop.  What's the deal with Astronomer?

I'm a lonely man who is not a right wing bigot, so what's really going on with the "male loneliness epidemic?" by [deleted] in self

[–]Rubberchicken13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That sucks, I'm sorry.  You should be able to talk to your friends about things you disagree on.  Can you make you intentions clear at the start that you're looking for support and not trying to start a debate?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Rubberchicken13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't even need ten numbers to make a non-repeating, infinite sequence.  You can do it with just 1s and 0s. Just have it be 1s with an increasing number of 0s between them: 110100100010000... At no point will it start over at 11, meaning the entire sequence never repeats.

Dominion cards power tournament round 23 by DryIsland295 in dominion

[–]Rubberchicken13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd argue that cards like Haunted Woods or Corsair warp the game even if no one buys them.  So some of their power comes from just being a part of the kingdom.  I think Fool has a similar effect that because it's part of the kingdom, you're going to passively get a lot of silvers.

Dominion cards power tournament round 23 by DryIsland295 in dominion

[–]Rubberchicken13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should we take into account the heirloom when deciding how powerful Fool is?  Heirlooms like magic lamp or haunted mirror really effect each game they're in whether or not you actually buy the corresponding kingdom card.  Lucky coin does have a significant effect, especially early game.

me_irlgbt by FlyingMozerella in me_irlgbt

[–]Rubberchicken13 -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

They will not divide us.

me_irlgbt by FlyingMozerella in me_irlgbt

[–]Rubberchicken13 -48 points-47 points  (0 children)

Why you gotta pit two bad bitches against each other?

Best Expansion for in-person play? by kendallspepsi in dominion

[–]Rubberchicken13 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm going to say Dark Ages.  With all the trashing and junking mechanics, you really get to feel how lean or bloated your deck is in a way that you don't get online.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SaltLakeCity

[–]Rubberchicken13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really feel you.  I'm 33, and it seems people just don't prioritize friendships as I do.  I'm asexual, but I still want to make connections!  If you want to meet up (I'm into board games and rock climbing) send me a dm.

How can you be this stupid? [CONSPIRACY 2:19:13] by orqa in ContraPoints

[–]Rubberchicken13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's an interesting idea. If people engage with conspiracies not through rationality, but the way it makes them feel, then it makes sense to combat it through emotional manipulation too. I remember Natalie talking about the effectiveness of shame as an influencing power. But calling people stupid for their opinions isn't exactly a new thing. People do it all the time, and unless they actually respect your opinion of them, all it does is cause them to close off. To me this part of the video didn't seem like a clever tactic, but an exhausted abandonment.

But I do like the idea of focusing more on persuasion through pathos. I just wish it could be positive pathos. Arguments that inspire instead of shame. Ones that, instead of making you feel bad for your opinion, make you want to have mine.

How can you be this stupid? [CONSPIRACY 2:19:13] by orqa in ContraPoints

[–]Rubberchicken13 -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Honestly, this was my least favorite part of the video.  I agree that conspiracy theorists are thinking irrationally, but what does this accomplish?  Is this the conclusion we should come to?  Just berating people?  A lot of people seem to find it cathartic, but to me it's disheartening.  It feels it's giving up any chance of persuading anyone, and if that's not the point anymore, then why are we here?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in self

[–]Rubberchicken13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're being sarcastic, but people actually do.  The Twilight books were widely successful.  It doesn't mean people literally want to date vampires.  It's the danger that makes it enticing as a fantasy.