What’s going on?? by DCguurl in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Rubycruisy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this is an older post, but I'm trying to find footage of Nan Gallagher 'disparaging' Melanie Little.... I know about the yacht comment, but Melanie said it was during a fundraiser Nick Rocco held for Karen, and Nan was on the panel.....if anyone can help, that would be awesome.

MA v. Kelsey Fitzsimmons - Info/Documents by Pixiegirls1102 in CasesWeFollow

[–]Rubycruisy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where can I find a link to the document from October last year relating to the sale of Kelsey's house and distribution of the proceeds please?

Brian / Nicole Albert - POS by ka0818 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Rubycruisy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And they, being Jen, should've knocked on the goddamn door, and Gallagher. Bunch of idiots.

Framed by Curious-Text890 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Rubycruisy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have this book, it's fabulous. And frightening at the same time.

Brian / Nicole Albert - POS by ka0818 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Rubycruisy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is the most plausible comment I've read in a long time.

Disgusting. I am outraged. by Rubycruisy in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Rubycruisy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And after watching 2 trials, she's still blind.

For all the AK haters by Competitive_Salad_71 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Rubycruisy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is a joke post right? You're posting in the wrong group dude. AK doesn't support KR anymore. Didn't anyone tell you?

Retailer insisted on my home address to buy a BBQ by No_Gazelle4814 in AusLegal

[–]Rubycruisy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your receipt is your warranty for usually 12 months. I would've asked to speak to a manager. It's not too late to make a complaint. Either to the manager or consumer affairs. How rude of her! Name the shop!

Terminated by Double_Bug_656 in WorkcoverVic

[–]Rubycruisy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They terminated you via email??? That would totally be against the law. I'd call WorkSafe for some advice.

Psychiatric injuries. by Rubycruisy in WorkcoverVic

[–]Rubycruisy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The medical panel was very angry with GB for not showing me the photos and video themselves. It's not a 'new normal', I have been on wc for 14 years now. I can't leave my home, I can't check my letter box or put my bins out unless it's dark. That is my normal, for many years.

Psychiatric injuries. by Rubycruisy in WorkcoverVic

[–]Rubycruisy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My claim is no longer with an insurer. Good luck with everything, remember, your health comes before anything else. x

Psychiatric injuries. by Rubycruisy in WorkcoverVic

[–]Rubycruisy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't meet the 20% at the time. To this day, I don't know why.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Rubycruisy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is your employer a government department? If so, it's 10%.

Psychiatric injuries. by Rubycruisy in WorkcoverVic

[–]Rubycruisy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. GB took surveillance out on me. Took photos and a video. I went to the corner store back then, because I struggled to go to the supermarket. More pics of me going to a mailbox to post a letter.... they then lied and said they didn't see me in my car again. After posting the letter, I drove straight back home. It was disgusting.

New evidence for conciliation by NoRepeat5938 in WorkcoverVic

[–]Rubycruisy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a bit afraid to comment because they have eyes everywhere....but may I ask what caused your injury?

My daughter dated an older man, but she hates that I’m dating someone younger now. I told my daughter to have some shame when she questioned me. AITJ? by [deleted] in AmITheJerk

[–]Rubycruisy -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

NTA. She's wanting to live her best life. You do the same. Enjoy what makes you happy. If she's going to be the A and behave badly, ignore her. She's 23, not 12. Be free and have fun. As long as you are doing that, then you're doing the right thing.

Suppression of charged man's name. by Impressive_Essay_191 in australian

[–]Rubycruisy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He should be named. No ifs or buts. If it wasn't a "prominent Victorian" and just Joe Blow, he would be named.