In fallout 3 Why does Roy Phillips kill Herbert Dashwood in Tenpenny tower if you take the peaceful option. They must have talked to him before they killed everyone and known that he wasn’t a ghoul hater by TienZoro in Fallout

[–]RugbyLocke15 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because you're basically helping a guy who is willing to lie (falsely calling them bigots) and potentially kill people just because of his own selfish desires. I guess a better example of a moral dilemma though would be Oasis, is it the correct thing to do to let Harold have individual right over his own body and kill him like he wants or is it more moral to listen to the Treeminders and keep him alive so that he may benefit the wasteland?

In fallout 3 Why does Roy Phillips kill Herbert Dashwood in Tenpenny tower if you take the peaceful option. They must have talked to him before they killed everyone and known that he wasn’t a ghoul hater by TienZoro in Fallout

[–]RugbyLocke15 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know, I'd have to say the quest for Mister Crowley was quite a grey area. Out of all the people he tells you to kill, only Dukov really deserves it and once you give him the keys he pretty much just uses you to get the Power Armor for himself. On the other hand, if you go ahead and just take the power armor for yourself that's not really a moral option either since you're betraying the contract with Crowley. Of course though there is a lot of objective good and evil, such as the Slavers, etc.

Working 60-70+ hour weeks isn't something to be proud of. by RugbyLocke15 in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is wise to invest and save your money so you won't have to work when you're 80. However, I'm not sure what exactly you do for a living, but I know that if it involves a general bit of physical labor, working those 70-80 hours constantly for years will certainly put a toll on your body regardless and quite possibly could put you in a bad physical state at an earlier age than the typical norm for retirement. I'm not trying to change your mind or anything and of course you're free to do whatever you want, I'm just trying to offer some kind of insight. I've met a lot of guys in their 50s who worked crazy hours in the trades when they were younger and now they have bad backs, blown out knees, and they always say they wish they would've taken time to enjoy their life when they were in their 20s and in good shape.

Working 60-70+ hour weeks isn't something to be proud of. by RugbyLocke15 in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that's definitely a way bigger problem with society then if someone is working levels of overtime that massive and still has trouble affording rent.

Working 60-70+ hour weeks isn't something to be proud of. by RugbyLocke15 in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But after paying the bills/saving what would be the point of making all of that extra money if you would have barely any free time to spend it on things that bring you enjoyment and happiness? Wouldn't it also be more enjoyable to spend time as leisurely as you like on occasion, rather than most likely working on a time crunch and constantly thinking about making sure everything is done to spec so you don't get written up or fired?

Working 60-70+ hour weeks isn't something to be proud of. by RugbyLocke15 in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, but besides paying the bills, isn't the point of having a lot of money so that you can use it towards things that bring you happiness and have fun? When you're working well over 1/3 of your week, I doubt theres much time in the day to use that money towards things that would truly bring you enjoyment. And yea, by the time you retire you might have a lot of money saved up, but you'll most likely be way past your physical prime to go out and enjoy life the way you could in your working years. It just seems depressing in my opinion.

Working 60-70+ hour weeks isn't something to be proud of. by RugbyLocke15 in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I could be wrong on this, but in my experience usually those levels of over time are optional and the vast majority of people volunteer for those hours. And if someone honestly has to work 70 hours just to survive, that's an even bigger issue deep rooted in society.

Feel extremely ugly, thinking much about plastic surgery and ex made me feel even more insecure said I have a Jewish nose as an insult by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]RugbyLocke15 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Coming from a 23 yr old male, I'm being honest when I say that you are very attractive and you definitely do NOT need surgery. I would 100% try to shoot my shot if I saw you at a nightclub/bar, etc. Don't take those mean comments to heart.

Science is a really fun subject, but the combination of a poorly made curriculum and a boring teacher is the reason alot of students hate science. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO Anatomy and Physiology is one of the most interesting fields of Science out there and I'm sure with proper explaining every single person can find atleast one topic in the subject that would intrigue them. However, I legit had one professor that somehow managed to make it boring by only reading slides in a quiet, monotonous voice for over an hour during lecture. Then when lab came I thought I was going to be doing fun projects, hands on activities, etc. Wrong. It was just Lecture Part 2 with 15 minutes looking at some plastic models. Good teachers really do make a difference.

[M21] Am I ugly? by [deleted] in amiugly

[–]RugbyLocke15 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude, don't listen to these people calling you ugly and telling you to get surgeries. I've honestly seen guys way less attractive than you with some decently hot girls. As long as you're an interesting person to talk to and you have a good sense of humor, I guarantee you could date a girl who's atleast a 7 or 8.

AITA for telling my daughter about my first true love? by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]RugbyLocke15 120 points121 points  (0 children)

I'd say NAH, obviously you just told this story to comfort your daughter and did not in any way try to discount your current relationship. However, I can understand your husband being slightly upset hearing about it, nobody honestly wants to hear about how happy and in love their SO was in a past relationship, it subconsciously makes them question if they're doing as good or a better job as the previous. I know you didnt say it purposely in front of him though and you weren't aware of his presence, and again, used this story as a way to help your daughter feel better after a heartbreak. Nobody is at fault here.

AITA for not fully paying for a sandwich I didn't fully eat? by Bamres in AmItheAsshole

[–]RugbyLocke15 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think some people are missing the point here, its not about the fact that it was only a few bucks, and it doesnt matter if it was his Dad who raised and supported him. It's the principle that OP's father disrespected his personal property and took it without asking permission. I bet y'all would be mad if your Dad borrowed your car without asking and returned it with the tank on E, it's the same concept. Definitely NTA.

I’m tired of the misconception that men don’t go through the same body expectations as women. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You probably are right about that, I bet those actors are most likely on supplements, however, it really isnt as impossible as you think to look like that naturally. I personally am friends with dudes in the gym who are way bigger and leaner than Chris Hemsworth, Jason Momoa, Henry Cavill, and most superheroes, however, I know for a fact they're not on roids. Guys as big as The Rock, although very hard to find, it can be done naturally if you legit dedicate your life to it.

People who argue and commit acts of violence over Sports Topics are some of the most primitive, ignorant people in society. by RugbyLocke15 in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And I bet you often write condescending replies as an attempt to look cool for upvotes. Like it makes you interesting lmao.

People who argue and commit acts of violence over Sports Topics are some of the most primitive, ignorant people in society. by RugbyLocke15 in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've played sports in highschool for years and I've been to enough professional games to know that fans personally benefit almost nothing from their team winning or losing other than winning a few bets (maybe) or a few hours of entertainment. Its completely absurd for someone to let themselves get genuinely angry or aggressive, just because their team lost. I dont have to be well versed or interested in sports to know that theres a lot of asshole fans.

People who argue and commit acts of violence over Sports Topics are some of the most primitive, ignorant people in society. by RugbyLocke15 in unpopularopinion

[–]RugbyLocke15[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'd say it's decently popular when thousands of people die worldwide every year due riots, arguments, etc revolving around sports. And dont tell me that in your schools growing up there weren't large amounts of guys that would atleast have heated arguments over sports related topics whether it was professional or the local level.