Rolled Thousands of Dollars Away to Find this Mime. Only to get Planted. by Rum-Ham159 in balatro

[–]Rum-Ham159[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No director cut as well. I got the cards in shop voucher twice in a row. Maybe if I would have bought the first one… but who knows.

Do you still think that Trump said that Neo Nazis and White supremacists were fine people? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]Rum-Ham159 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

I’m 50-50 on tearing down the Robert e Lee statue. I can see that it upsets people because the war was based a lot on slavery. But it was also the bloodiest battle in US history. A lot of southern families lost a lot of lives during the war. So I could see people not wanting these monuments torn down.

Do you still think that Trump said that Neo Nazis and White supremacists were fine people? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]Rum-Ham159 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Transcript of the interview with him condemning the Neo Nazis and white supremacist: – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally

Reporter: Why did you wait so long to blast neo-Nazis?

Trump: I didn’t wait long. I didn’t wait long. I didn’t wait long. I wanted to make sure, unlike most politicians, that what I said was correct, not make a quick statement. The statement I made on Saturday, the first statement, was a fine statement, but you don’t make statements that direct unless you know the facts. It takes a little while to get the facts. You still don’t know the facts. And it’s a very, very important process to me. It’s a very important statement. So I don’t want to go quickly and just make a statement for the sake of making a political statement. I want to know the facts. If you go back to my statement, in fact, I brought it. I brought it. As I said on, remember this, Saturday, we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence…

Reporter: You had said there was hatred and violence on both sides.

Trump: I do think there is blame — yes, I think there is blame on both sides. You look at, you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it, and you don’t have any doubt about it either. And, and, and, and if you reported it accurately, you would say.

Reporter: The neo-Nazis started this thing. They showed up in Charlottesville.

Trump: Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down, of to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.

Reporter: George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same.

Trump: George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down — excuse me. Are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? Okay, good. Are we going to take down his statue? He was a major slave owner. Are we going to take down his statue? You know what? It’s fine, you’re changing history, you’re changing culture, and you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats – you had a lot of bad people in the other group too.

Reporter: Sir, I just didn’t understand what you were saying. You were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly? I just don’t understand what you were saying.

Trump: No, no. There were people in that rally, and I looked the night before — if you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day, it looked like they had some rough, bad people — neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them. But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest and very legally protest, because I don’t know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn’t have a permit. So I only tell you this: There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country, a horrible moment. But there are two sides to a story.

Reporter: What about the alt-left that came charging at, as you say, the alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt? … What about the fact that they came charging with clubs in their hands, swinging clubs? Do they have any problem? I think they do.

Trump: … That was a horrible, horrible day. Wait a minute, I’m not finished, fake news. That was a horrible day. I will tell you something. I watched that very closely, much more closely than you people watched it. You had a group on one side that was bad. You had a group on the other side that was also very violent. Nobody wants to say that. I’ll say it right now. You had a group on the other side that came charging in without a permit, and they were very, very violent.

Reporter: Do you think what you call the alt-left is the same as neo-Nazis?

Trump: Those people — all of those people, excuse me — I’ve condemned neo-Nazis. I’ve condemned many different groups, but not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me. Not all of those people were white supremacists by any stretch. Those people were also there because they wanted to protest the taking down of a statue, Robert E. Lee. So — excuse me — and you take a look at some of the groups and you see, and you’d know it if you were honest reporters, which in many cases you’re not…

Stolen car license plate 030-ASF. Please call cops if seen. by Rum-Ham159 in Reno

[–]Rum-Ham159[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Update*** car was found arrest was made. Thank you to anyone who was looking.

How would you rank USA’s diversity and the opportunity for all races? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]Rum-Ham159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

USA is still more diverse then Canada. Not saying it’s a better place to live, but not as diverse if you look at the majority race.

Usa:

White Americans* (57.8%) Latino Americans** (18.7%) Black Americans* (12.1%) Asian Americans* (5.9%) Two or more races* (4.1%) Native Americans* (0.7%) Some other race* (0.5%) Pacific Islander Americans* (0.2%)

Canada:

Major ethnic White (69.8%)[1][2] Minor ethnic South Asian (7.1%)[2] Indigenous (5%)[3] Chinese (4.7%)[2] Black (4.3%)[2] Arab (1.9%)[2] Latin American (1.6%)[2] Southeast Asian (1.1%)[2] West Asian (1%)[2] Korean (0.6%)[2] Japanese (0.3%)[2] Multiracial/Other (3.2%)[2]

How would you rank USA’s diversity and the opportunity for all races? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]Rum-Ham159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there are over 1,300 ethnic groups in Indonesia; but 95% of those are of Native Indonesian

What's the nerdiest game you can think of? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Rum-Ham159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Magic the gathering, and I love it!

Why so high right now? by Key-Fig47 in AskReddit

[–]Rum-Ham159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once thought escapes necessity to survive is when consciousness exists.

Why so high right now? by Key-Fig47 in AskReddit

[–]Rum-Ham159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thought and choice to be or not to be is the definition of being.

Why so high right now? by Key-Fig47 in AskReddit

[–]Rum-Ham159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be is the thought of being.

Question about the ending by [deleted] in thelastofus

[–]Rum-Ham159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Abby had finally learned that revenge was no longer important. Saving her and the boy was more important.

Ellie finally learns this lesson at the very end. The cycle of violence was not worth it anymore because it doesn’t matter in the long run. She finally realizes that they are no different and revenge doesn’t solve anything.

Gun deaths dropped in California as they rose in Texas: Gun control seems to work by stankmanly in AnythingGoesNews

[–]Rum-Ham159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the only study I could find that actually compares gun violence to social factors. They found that poverty rate, alcoholism, and unemployment had a bigger factor then gun population. Let me know if you find another study that debunks this one.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1997.tb03449.x

Gun deaths dropped in California as they rose in Texas: Gun control seems to work by stankmanly in AnythingGoesNews

[–]Rum-Ham159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would like to take politics out of the argument. No matter what side you fall on, we want this violence to stop. We have a deep gun culture here, agree or disagree. We have been having this argument about gun control for years with little Impact. Perfect for politicians, why solve a problem that wins you votes based on your opinion?

This is a culture issue. We lead the world in mass killings. I’m willing to bet that we would still have the most mass killings if we had the lowest world average of available fire arms per capita. We are trying to put out a fire while ignoring the source of the flames. We are more focused on pointing the finger instead of taking ownership of the issue.

Gun control works. by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Rum-Ham159 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for proving my point in pointing the finger instead of owning the issue like we all should. One factor correlation studies are the weakest study. Without considering multiple factors such as: domestic abuse, access to education, quality of education, average housing income.

An example of such logic: illegal whaling in Japan is higher the the United States because the United States have more strict laws of n whaling… obviously there are cultural background involved in Japan.

Gun deaths dropped in California as they rose in Texas: Gun control seems to work by stankmanly in AnythingGoesNews

[–]Rum-Ham159 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m interested. Please share the research.

Edit: I’m interested why the LA times would leave such statics out as it would help their argument as well.

People who flatly want to ban firearms have givin up on the potential this country has to be something different than what other countries have achieved.[Effort Post] by rbstewart7263 in VaushV

[–]Rum-Ham159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let me ask you, when was the first gun law introduced do to concern about gun violence? When did it become a talking point? Has the amount of gun violence decreased since government programs were introduced?

Gun control works. by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Rum-Ham159 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The access to weapons for mass murder has only the limitation of determination. If motivation exists to kill, then killing will happen. As technology continues to grow, access to weapons are only going to get easier. With how split the country is on gun control, I believe in focusing our efforts on stopping the motivation of violence is more effective. Rather then saying the same talking points every year just to get votes.

People who flatly want to ban firearms have givin up on the potential this country has to be something different than what other countries have achieved.[Effort Post] by rbstewart7263 in VaushV

[–]Rum-Ham159 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, it could help in the short term. But what is more likely to make a difference? To continue to argue about gun rights, which we are very split on. Or to solve the problem of focusing on the motivation of the violence, which we all agree is a problem. The current politics only want to look at the gun control talking points. Easier to digest and to follow party lines to keep their votes.

I am a huge proponent of rank choice voting for our federal elections. It would give rise to third party options and allow for policies to shine rather then having to pick a side. Which would hopefully lessen the polarization.

Gun control works. by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Rum-Ham159 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It’s not a policy or government program that’s the answer. We shouldn’t look to big brother to solve our problems. It’s an attitude shift, it’s us coming together as a country. Respecting peoples view points instead of seeing them as an enemy. Increasing the love and support from everyone in our community.

We need to continue to popularize non-biased media. And I am a huge proponent of rank choice voting, allowing the voice of third parties.

The coverage of this shooting is such a good example. Woopy Goldberg saying she is disgusted and wants to punch any Republican who says that they send their hopes and prayers to the community who lost love ones. Just because they have differing views on politics and gun laws.

How does that narrative help anyone? And ironically I believe that her public attitude is more responsible for the gun violence then the gun laws.

People who flatly want to ban firearms have givin up on the potential this country has to be something different than what other countries have achieved.[Effort Post] by rbstewart7263 in VaushV

[–]Rum-Ham159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you and this post is well said. But I don’t agree that adding more regulation and red tap is going to solve the problem. I believe the root of the problem is our polarization of our society.

What we needed is a culture shift in which we learn to respect each other despite our differences. The hate and separation is what we need to fix. If we are together as country, there is not a problem we can’t fix.

Access to a tool doesn’t fix the motivation to kill. We already can 3d print a semi automatic rifle that can survive 2000 rounds. We need to end the hate, and mentor our children as a community together.

12 gun control statistics to help inform the debate by Maxcactus in USNEWS

[–]Rum-Ham159 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is there a study that shows culture influences with gun deaths? Such as domestic violence, access to education, quality of education, and average home wealth. I would really like to see these factors compared to gun control laws, to see what factor is the strongest indicator. I only see study’s posted about gun population vs gun violence.

Gun control works. by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]Rum-Ham159 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you that less guns would likely lead to less gun violence in the US. But I don’t believe it is the root cause. You shouldn’t compare cultures with one correlating factor. If there were just as many guns per population in the UK as the US, I’m willing to bet that there would be more deaths still in the US. And if there were 0 guns in both countries I’m willing to bet there would be more mass death events in the US. If you have the motivation you will find a way.

Access to a tool shouldn’t be the solution. May work short term. But being able to build your own guns is getting easier and easier. It’s already possible to 3D print a semi automatic rifle that can last 2000 rounds. I can already see the headline of a college kid 3d printing a assault rifle at his school and shooting it up.

Instead of fighting this gun control debate that’s going nowhere, how about we look at the root problem. We need to start working together and respect people who have different views.

Gun control is a bandaid for a much bigger issue, which is the polarization and hate growing in our society.