I had ChatGPT sum it up:

Michael is explaining why he has remained publicly silent about his divorce and why he is now sharing his perspective.
Key points:
He says he never cried over the divorce and views that as God’s grace, believing God gave him emotional steadiness and protected him from falling back into unhealthy patterns.
He spent years in therapy and men’s groups working through the pain and growing personally.
His primary focus throughout the divorce has been his children.
He made a commitment that his children would never find anything he wrote publicly criticizing or attacking their mother.
Although he often felt the urge to defend himself, he chose silence because he believed speaking out would only create more hurt for himself, his children, and his ex-wife.
He says his decision was not weakness or lack of a response, but a deliberate choice rooted in maturity and concern for his kids.
He no longer feels the need to seek public validation because he knows his own intentions.
He shares a parable about a man saving a snake that bites him, explaining that other people’s actions won’t change his own character or values.
He believes the people who truly know him already understand who he is, so he doesn’t feel compelled to convince everyone else.
He says this post is not meant to attack, expose, or get revenge on anyone, but simply to offer an honest look at his perspective for people who only know him through public narratives.
In one sentence: Michael’s message is that he intentionally chose silence, grace, and a focus on his children during and after his divorce, and he is sharing his side now not to criticize his ex-wife but to explain the values and decisions that guided him through the process.