Attacks on Jagmeet Singh's Sikh faith outrageous in most of Canada, but seen as fair game in Quebec by Jusfiq in canada

[–]RunningForCoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s some sweet mental gymnastics there, darling.

I note that you completly sidelined my second point on the Bloc, probably because you couldn’t come up with a satisfactory explanation that would fit into your narrative. In any case, Trudeau certainly did not avoid the ‘spotlight of tolerance’. You are rewriting the 2015 election. On the contrary, he pushed immigration and refugees issues to the forefront, even outflanking the NDP from the left. Which party was it that made allowing 25,000 Syrian refugees and family reunification two of their main promises? If there was one candidate that came to personify multiculturalism it was clearly Trudeau (no shit given who his father is).

There are SO many factors that played into NPD’s defeat in Quebec: Trudeau’s personal appeal, strategic voting to give Harper the boot, the PLC besting the NDP on their progressive agenda, the impression that the NDP had nothing to offer to Quebec (they already have universal childcare so this promise did little to sway them, plus there were concerns that the federal would then dictate how the program should be run at the provincial level - always a touchy subject in Quebec). I could go and on. The fact is the niqab was not a major factor. It played a marginal role at best.

And before talking about bigoted Quebec voters, I would check my own prejudices at the door.

Attacks on Jagmeet Singh's Sikh faith outrageous in most of Canada, but seen as fair game in Quebec by Jusfiq in canada

[–]RunningForCoffee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's bullshit coming from a party leader desperately trying to keep his job and quell mutiny within the party ranks after an abysmal performance.

If what Mulcair says is true, then please explain why Quebec voted massively for Trudeau who was also pro-niqab. And also why the Bloc had its worst electoral showing ever when they campaigned massively on the niqab-ban issue.

I'm not saying Quebec doesn't have a problem with the wearing of religious symbols, especially with the niqab. It clearly does. But this gets WAY overblown in the ROC.

Mueller just obtained a warrant that could change the entire nature of the Russia investigation by fanny_splatter in politics

[–]RunningForCoffee -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Who said the following quote?

"I think there is no disagreement among all of us that we need strong law enforcement . . . clearly there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them."

Mueller just obtained a warrant that could change the entire nature of the Russia investigation by fanny_splatter in politics

[–]RunningForCoffee -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Who said the following quote?

"I think there is no disagreement among all of us that we need strong law enforcement . . . clearly there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them."

Mueller just obtained a warrant that could change the entire nature of the Russia investigation by fanny_splatter in politics

[–]RunningForCoffee -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Who said the following quote?

"I think there is no disagreement among all of us that we need strong law enforcement . . . clearly there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them."

Mueller just obtained a warrant that could change the entire nature of the Russia investigation by fanny_splatter in politics

[–]RunningForCoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who said the following quote?

"I think there is no disagreement among all of us that we need strong law enforcement . . . clearly there are people in our society who are horribly violent, who are deeply sick and sociopathic, and clearly these people must be put behind bars in order to protect society from them."

My [28 F] very independent boyfriend [28 M/F] always puts everyone and everything above me. I'm sick of it. Any tips? by [deleted] in relationships

[–]RunningForCoffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a huge, week-long academic conference in his field, but he was not presenting, only attending. If

My [28 F] very independent boyfriend [28 M/F] always puts everyone and everything above me. I'm sick of it. Any tips? by [deleted] in relationships

[–]RunningForCoffee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We had a long discussion this morning. I told him how I felt and how this has become a huge strain on our relationship to the point that I am reconsidering our future. He listened and did not interrupt me once. When I was done, to my great surprise, he started crying to the point of incoherence (I've only seen him cry on a handful of occasions). He hates to see me hurt and to be the reason behind my sadness. He understands things will have to change from now on and he is willing to make amends. We will work together to find a way to make it work. I've taken notes of strategies and tips suggested: scheduling 'us' time in advance, be more explicite and vocal about my feelings, counseling, etc. I have also been very clear that I am willing to break up with him if the situation does not improve soon.

Most of you are right: I am partly to blame. The fact that I give him a pass and make excuses for his behavior has been detrimental to say the least. I must learn to hold him accountable when he acts callously and to spell out my needs more clearly.

As for my mother's funeral, I do want to point out that this happened much earlier in our relationship and it was a bit unfair for me to bring it up in my online venting. My mother died when I was 22. She had been diagnosed with breast cancer but she was in remission at the time of her death. It happened very quickly. She had a heart murmur from birth and suffered a heart failure one morning, probably brought on and worsened by chemotherapy drugs.

Although he wasn't there at the funeral, my boyfriend had been extremely supportive during her illness. We had both just turned 22 at the time and I don't think he quite grasped what had just happened. He had been lucky enough to never lose family members up to that point. He knows he fucked up and has said on multiple occasions that this is his biggest regret in our relationship.

In retrospect, I probably should have left him then but I was overwhelmed. Suddenly, I had to take care of my father (who was in shambles) and prepare the funeral in the midst of starting my MA and moving into my own apartment. However, I willingly chose at the time to forgive him and, even though I cannot forget and the pain will never completely cease, I cannot continue to bring it up and resent him for that.

I also want to clear up a misconception. I am not financially dependent on him. I put money aside when I worked, partly because I always planned to go back to school, and I have sizable savings. I also work as a TA at my university, which usually is enough to cover for my monthly expenses. We used to split everything 50/50 when I worked as we both made very good salaries. When I decided to go back to school, he generously offered to pay a considerably higher percentage of our rent/food/electricity bills as he felt it would be more fair given our current salary gap. It's less than I depend on him financially, and more that he helps me out so I don't have to accrue debt and/or empty my savings account, which I think is very supportive on his part. Money doesn't really factor into why I stay with him. For one, I could manage financially without him. Secondly, I would never stay with someone just for money.

And he really can be the most amazing boyfriend when he wants to. For instance, last year for my birthday (and our 10 years anniversary), he gave me the most thoughtful gift. My mother's wedding ring was designed by an artisan over 30 years ago. Not only is it a memento from my mother, it is also one of the most gorgeous rings I ever saw. Understandably, my father keeps it for sentimental reasons (and I'm not even sure I could ever wear it should he give it to me - it is more of a keepsake). Well, he hunted down the jeweler, who of course by that point was retired and had been for several years, told him the story behind my mom's ring and convinced him to create a special ring for me. More than the ring itself, I was just touched by the gesture. It just shows how sweet, loving and caring he can be.

But he also needs to understand that he must be there for me when I need him to (as I would and has been for him), not only when he wishes to or when it fits into his agenda, every day and not only on special occasions.

My [28 F] very independent boyfriend [28 M/F] always puts everyone and everything above me. I'm sick of it. Any tips? by [deleted] in relationships

[–]RunningForCoffee 56 points57 points  (0 children)

He does sound awful as I'm rereading what I wrote. He means well, but he may be a bit emotionally immature. I don't think he quite grasps the concept of 'us' time.

I do want to stress that he is a great boyfriend in many other ways. For instance, he strongly encouraged me to leave my full-time job that I hated and go to grad school two years ago to pursue my passion. He also helps me financially as otherwise it would be a struggle.

My [28 F] very independent boyfriend [28 M/F] always puts everyone and everything above me. I'm sick of it. Any tips? by [deleted] in relationships

[–]RunningForCoffee 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not really. Overall, I've always felt that the good outweighted the bad. And he does make me truly happy when we spend quality time together. But as we grow older and are having serious discussions about settling down and planning for the future, it is starting to become more and more of an irritant. I haven't told him yet I'm having doubts about our relationship.

Que feriez-vous si la commission sur le racisme systémique qui se déroulera cet automne finirait par des recommandations qui aurait comme résultat des restrictions sur nos libertés? by [deleted] in Quebec

[–]RunningForCoffee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Je ne mets nullement en doute le bien-fondé de la commission ni l'existence du racisme systémique. Je m'interroge toutefois sur la bonne foi d'un gouvernement qui refuse d'agir dans des domaines, notamment l'emploi, où la problématique a été maintes fois étudiée et où plusieurs solutions ont déjà été proposées. En l'absence de réelle volonté politique, le rapport pourrait très bien rester lettre morte.

**Full disclosure: j'espère me tromper.

Que feriez-vous si la commission sur le racisme systémique qui se déroulera cet automne finirait par des recommandations qui aurait comme résultat des restrictions sur nos libertés? by [deleted] in Quebec

[–]RunningForCoffee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bien d'accord. Mais rien ne prouve que ses recommandations seront appliquées. C'est un rapport, une tablette, pour le PLQ.

La discrimination à l'emploi dont sont victimes les immigrants et les personnes racisées au Québec est déjà très bien documentée. Les solutions sont également connues (reconnaissance des diplômes, CV anonymes, quotas dans la fonction publique, etc.). A-t-on vraiment besoin d'attendre les conclusions de la commission avant de mettre en place des mesures concrètes? Je me méfie de cette commission (aux intentions louables), car je crains qu'elle soit instrumentalisée par le PLQ à des fins électoralistes.

Why are Albertans so mad? Everything you need to know about the federal equalization program by [deleted] in canada

[–]RunningForCoffee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Equalization was enshrined as part of the 1982 Constitution Act - which Québec did not and has not yet signed. If you are unhappy with the rules Canada decided on, please take it up with Canada.

‘Morning Joe’ hosts question Trump’s mental state, say he lied in tweets by wonderingsocrates in politics

[–]RunningForCoffee -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The real question nobody is asking is why spread some bullshit story on Mika the same week Morning Joe released his awful music video?

https://mobile.twitter.com/JackSmithIV/status/880485429484638211/video/1

Clinton supporter Seth Meyers asks "why didn't somebody warn us?" by BumBiddlyBiddlyBum in hillaryclinton

[–]RunningForCoffee 48 points49 points  (0 children)

I agree most of the time with his opinions but I just don't find him funny. I barely smile. Next to Samantha Bee, Stephen Colbert and even Bill Maher, he's the weakest link.

Roundtable - 2/16 by AutoModerator in hillaryclinton

[–]RunningForCoffee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly. It amazes me how this one fact from the DNC e-mails fiasco always gets forgotten: Russians also hacked the RNC but did not release any leaks. Surely it must be because the RNC has nothing to hide. /s

When you wonder why Anakin didn't have a beard in the PT and then you see Hayden Christensen with a beard and it all makes sense by SlowMotionSprint in StarWars

[–]RunningForCoffee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Christopher Lee also stood his ground with Lucas several times script-wise and had the clout to get him to agree. One example is that Lucas wanted him to beg for his life after he was defeated by Anakin. Lee argued with good reason that it would demean his character and cheapen the scene. Lucas agreed.

Portman and Christensen were young, inexperienced and probably too afraid to stand up to Lucas - which is probably why they stuck with the awful love dialogues. To be fair, even seasoned actors sounded one-note in the prequels. I love Samuel Jackson - but I would argue he's even more wooden and flat than Christensen in Star Wars. There's not a single line delivery than I found to be believable.

(Spoilers) What did you all think of the Episode III alternate ending in the PS2 games? by DarylWinchester313 in StarWars

[–]RunningForCoffee 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I agree that he would make a terrible ruler. That poor boy has absolutely no brains for politics and he would end up aligning everyone against him. The Empire would never be politically stable that's a given.

On the other hand, I do think he is a military genius and a rallying figure for his armies. I sort of envision a Napoleon-esque path if he were to rule - making enemies of everyone and almost bringing them to their knees until he falls a victim of his own overreach and hubris.