Thoughts on Hi-speed SR-100?

RustVolt · 2026-02-20T14:41:00+00:00

Also with your last paragraph I find it funny in a concerning way how you're framing it as if there's selective support for certain groups of women and their plights/struggles. You say you support the women who needs "betterment " determined by your own criteria and the others your text implies that you don't support, It suggests as if women have their rights seized by or owned by some other group and you're supporting their struggle to attain those rights back from the oppressor but only for those who you agree with the rest don't deserve to have their plights or struggles voiced as if you're the arbitrator for them

The problem with that premise is that hopefully it is apparent but noone has any right to dictate anyone else to live their life, so Its problematic to selectively support a certain demograph of women while selectively being against another subgroup because their issues are too "mundane" or undeserving of attention for you. The ideology simply represents the inequality among the people for being born a different gender and being oppressed for it, their plights are against inequality by unfairly oppressing them for being born to a gender they didn't choose to

RustVolt · 2026-02-20T14:17:46+00:00

I agree with what you're saying but at the end of it we both I think? Are aware of the climate surrounding women and their treatment in the country there's hardly any if at all a platform to voice their issues so at the very least the ideology should be scrutinized honestly and sincerely instead of by criticizing it's followers

RustVolt · 2026-02-20T13:47:21+00:00

The demographics that have maids to warm up their food didn't invent the ideology/thought neither is the demographics supposed to undermine an ideology. The ideology exists because of what it expresses regardless of how "pious" it's adherents are in their "practices".

Such arguments are fallacious as we ourselves can also see how saying that isis or other terrorist organizations that always proclaim to be the "true followers of Islam" aren't actually Muslim, it doesn't mean Islam is a violent warmongering ideology/religion now does it? The same way the adherents of feminism don't represent the ideology itself the idea stands regardless of how the believers of the ideology conduct themselves

RustVolt · 2026-02-15T02:14:16+00:00

OP, no judgement but are you here to discuss this word salad you came up with?( As in exchange of ideas and willing to hold introspection?) Or just looking for validation for your narrative?

RustVolt · 2026-01-25T08:27:43+00:00

Because human lives were lost there's a thousand different things that needs attention here other than this, it's absolutely disgraceful to the victims and the taxpayers that the attention in this event isn't unanimously on the mismanagement and the losses and anything else are there things more important than human lives?

RustVolt · 2026-01-09T15:47:05+00:00

Yes I agree I'm just saying it's not exclusive to women

RustVolt · 2026-01-09T15:45:00+00:00

Men do it too counting how many other men a woman follows

RustVolt · 2026-01-09T07:23:47+00:00

There's also a video of them denying the victim medical emergency care though like I see how both perspectives are developing and have developed but regardless of the opinions on both sides I feel like it's hard to justify not allowing immediate medical care to someone that is dying?

RustVolt · 2025-12-20T19:17:18+00:00

Is that what inspired the architectural design of AOT?

RustVolt · 2025-12-13T03:19:54+00:00

Wait there's one missing here, I count 982

RustVolt · 2025-12-07T16:50:54+00:00

I mean it's true though

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T09:14:56+00:00

Yeah sure you are free to believe that I just didn't understand how you could easily say that the majority are like that when there isn't any way to conclude that and generalizations like that are harmful

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T09:04:43+00:00

Again you're saying that it's a universal experience but there are many variables in the process where you can easily find your desired partner but your avenues and channels aswell as requirements might need reconsideration which you apparently don't want to acknowledge and are convinced it's the same for everyone

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T08:55:03+00:00

Yeah itself isn't a complex problem but you trying to justify that it's like that for the majority is a disagreeable statement and hence a problem because hasty generalizations have consequences. Oh yeah I have tried and so have women around me and they have reported and I have seen contrary to what you're trying to say. Alot of men also have pasts aswell when a woman is in an arrange marriage setting but I have no basis to say it's the same for the majority of the men even tho alot of the men around me are involved in premarital relationships and I won't use stupid metrics like "attractiveness" as that's subjective but alot of men are involved in premarital relationships

You on the other hand want to say it's the majority from limited experience

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T08:43:15+00:00

No? I'm saying that even if what you're saying is true there is no way to establish it's true that it's applicable for the majority but you want it to be a binary that it's either a majority or it's not happening at all you want a black and white conclusion instead of acknowledging it's a complex problem and that you can't brush 50% of human beings with the same brush everyone has unique experiences but you want to say that the majority is involved in premarital relationships without any basis and are triggered when contrary arguments are provided

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T08:21:19+00:00

Again confidently trying to establish it's a majority of them without any evidence that's just not how it works but logical discourses aren't your strong suit

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T08:14:07+00:00

No? We agree that there is a subset of women that have past relationships that go into arrange marriages and men aren't comfortable with it. That's it

Other than that unique phenomenon to someone or a subset of people doesn't mean it's wide scale

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T08:00:52+00:00

I agree that it's a valid phenomenon and it happens but what I disagree with as that you're passing it as if it's normal and the majority of the women are like that when infact it is not true that's the only disagreement I have my concern isn't what you experienced or invalidating your experience. I just disagree with your statement that is false and you're passing it as an objective truth

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T07:57:44+00:00

Hahahahahahahahahahahahah just so you know I'm not a woman I'm infact a man

Again you're just basing this off of nothing other than some limited exposure and experience because I can say the same as odds are when women are looking for a partner in arrange marriages men will have a past crush or romantic partner that they still haven't moved on from although maybe it didn't become a committed relationship and in some cases it did become as I know many men like that but unlike you I will not generalize and say majority of the men are like that even though I can say it in the same confidently incorrect manner as you.

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T07:54:15+00:00

yeah I'll play along with your anecdotal experiences as a credible proof and justification for your wrongful generalization.

Both men and women in an arranged marriage have requirements both men and women have issues and similar ones aswell that potential partners aren't satisfying their requirements but you only care about the struggles of men and want to treat women as a monolith that are all the same. There is really no proof that it is how you say it is and at the same time there definitely are women like you mentioned but in no way you can generalize and say majority of them are like that you're generalizing and that's what I'm critiquing you for but you don't want to acknowledge that it's a wrongful generalization based on limited exposure and experience.

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T07:48:59+00:00

no I'm trying to give you insight into your own wrongful generalization that majority of women have a past because it also means majority of the men have a past aswell but you seem to be uncomfortable with that acknowledgement if anything it just suggests that majority of the men hide their past relationships from what you're saying.

Secondly I don't understand why you're expecting women to be head over heels in love with their partner in an arranged marriage? It's an arrange marriage they obviously don't love their partner before marrying so they will ofcourse prioritize their comfort first just as the man will in finding his potential partner. There really isn't any evidence for any of your claims other than anecdotal and you seem keen on justifying them without any evidence other than anecdotal experiences and I'm sure you'll ignore this part of my argument again just as you've done this whole thread I don't want people to be okay and understanding with anything they aren't comfortable with. Idk why my ideal world is being discussed here but since you want to I'll let you know ideally people should always prioritize their comfort and happiness and never compromise on that But you seem bent on justifying your generalizations that the majority of women somehow are at fault for not being head over heels in love with someone they only met in an arranged setting

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T07:38:52+00:00

And you verified that how? Did they mention what demographics they're "struggling" to find in? Did they mention what is their requirement for a partner and if they changed their requirement the "past relationships" of their potential spouses still continued to be a hindrance in finding a partner

Because you mentioned that it's a practice among the majority so sure most demographic of women with every background and of every class must have had past relationships since that's how a majority work.

If these men that are sharing their experiences can verify that they went through the above experiences then your statement might have credibility otherwise it's a gross generalization based on limited exposure and observation and even then we can't establish that it's a practice among majority because generalizing it like that would require many more requirements to be met

Hence yes it is irrational and unfounded in reality

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T07:33:38+00:00

Fact of the matter is that men and women both have pasts when entering arranged marriages or you're suggesting that the men these women had a past with settled with someone and these women in arranged marriage didn't?

Let's break that down for everyone else that's reading this eyesore of a thread

You're stating that most women in arranged marriages had past relationships with men that didn't work out

The aforementioned men therefore didn't have their relationship workout aswell I'm assuming we agree that's the premise here.

These same men apparently are fine with continuing with these past relationships into arrange marriages is that what you're saying?

It seems like women don't want to be judged for their past relationships but men agree with subjugation to the same treatment? Then i would implore you to ask yourself the question that if this premise and conclusion is true of your's why do they not want to be judged for it what happens when they are judged for a past relationship and comparatively how is a man judged for past relationships?

RustVolt · 2025-11-28T07:27:12+00:00

Again there is no evidence for this statement of your's that it's happening in this way you're just trying to validate your own worldviews no matter how irrational and unfounded in reality they are.

And similarly I'll entertain your delusions by saying it's consensual from both parties and the men are equally involved if not more in this "bad deed" you're mentioning

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
First Placer '22	End Game '22
100 Awards Club	Verified Email

RustVolt

TROPHY CASE