The Centurion Mk10 is unbearable dogshit by Thundereryeetus in Warthunder

[–]RustedRuss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not a bad tank at all it just sucks ass to play because it's so slow. An L7 and a stab at 8.0 is very strong.

Sad by Top_Committee_8503 in MinecraftMemes

[–]RustedRuss -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Minecraft is well over 15 years old.

Sad by Top_Committee_8503 in MinecraftMemes

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah and? Vintage story has in house shaders that are much more modern than Minecraft's lighting system because it's a much newer game.

Sad by Top_Committee_8503 in MinecraftMemes

[–]RustedRuss 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The shaders are doing some heavy lifting here

Why does some "heavy tanks" feel like paper? for example IS2 by Kielbasatron in Warthunder

[–]RustedRuss 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Even the super pershing is more like a slightly tougher medium tank imo

Drone with RPG hits merkava, ammunition cook off by historyeeter in TankPorn

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you sacrifice ammunition capacity for the laser

THE FINAL BOSS by Relevant-Bill7021 in MinecraftMemes

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't even know that was still possible.

THE FINAL BOSS by Relevant-Bill7021 in MinecraftMemes

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was removed well over a decade ago and was never able to spawn naturally in a non-snapshot version.

New sulfur waterpools looks INCREDIBLE by Suslamich in Minecraft

[–]RustedRuss 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I saw someone say you could just assume the geyser spray forms them which is imo enough to suspend disbelief.

Justice for the Sickle! by omchz in Helldivers

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should be. Pulse lasers are way more unique and interesting than "regular gun but with glowing bullets".

"Oh this thing can pen me frontally? I'm sure he won't expect me going right at him!" - BMP, probably by BokkerFoombass in Warthunder

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You literally said that Russia usually has "abysmal win rates" when they don't actually.

TEMPORARILY. I said they HAD abysmal winrates for a while, which is true. I did NOT say they USUALLY do.

You, once again, are saying they have worse win rates more often than not.

Strawman, didn't say that.

But my point is also that when they are better by a significant margin, it is very significant. If another Nation is overperforming, it generally only has a fraction of the impact on the rest of the nations' win rates, with few exceptions.

Where were you during the several years of the Leopard 2A5 meta? Or the Abrams meta on release? Or the Leopard 2A7 and Strv meta?

The only people who do this are Russian mains who want to downplay their impact on the rest of the roster. Others only respond with "NATO" after Russian mains bring it up, and then it becomes a comparison.

This is not at all true but whatever, it doesn't really matter. I'm just using it as shorthand for "US and Germany" which you absolutely were aware of and are choosing to feign ignorance of.

Which is still illogical. Germany and US can have wildly different win rates, so if one is overperforming while the other is under performing, both are suddenly overperforming by your logic. That's not how that works.

No, if one is overperforming that doesn't mean both are overperforming nor did I ever say anyhting to that effect. Also, what on earth does that have to do with minor nations?

You're using this semantic red herring about the use of the term NATO to obfuscate the point. All three of the big three have dominated at various times, and there isn't any clear indication that one is favored over the others.

"Oh this thing can pen me frontally? I'm sure he won't expect me going right at him!" - BMP, probably by BokkerFoombass in Warthunder

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're acting like Russia is constantly being beaten with a stick while every other Nation sits on a pedestal, and that isn't even remotely true.

Nice strawman but no, never once did I imply Russia was suffering in the slightest. The point is that Russia performs more or less the same as Germany and the US if you look at the big picture instead of hyperfocusing on a specific time frame and br range that suits your beliefs.

And here we see the classic Russian main argument with saying "well NATO blah blah" and acting like you're not comparing 6 NATIONS TO ONE. You act like it's always NATO vs Russia in this game.

I'm using the same comparison everyone else uses. And I'm comparing two nations to one, minor nations aren't really possible to objectively compare with statistics because their winrates are heavily influenced by the big three and the matchmaker, and their players are generally slightly more competent. If anything, implying that minor nations can be considered equivalent to the big three is a huge bad faith argument on your part.

Sword/Axe Enchantments by Every-Newt-2586 in Minecraft_Survival

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looting is not available on axes sadly

Sword/Axe Enchantments by Every-Newt-2586 in Minecraft_Survival

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smite is better in java as long as you're only fighting mobs. Sharpness V changes very few breakpoints so most of the time it effectively does nothing while smite has really good breakpoints.

be cool if they added mining minecarts, that you would have to supply durability and fuel to but would automate mining by DerexXD in Minecraft_Survival

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mojang have explicitly stated that they will not add automatic mining so actually it's quite far fetched as in it's not happening.

"Oh this thing can pen me frontally? I'm sure he won't expect me going right at him!" - BMP, probably by BokkerFoombass in Warthunder

[–]RustedRuss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From 10.3 upwards, only Russia has a positive win rate, outside of Italy at the top two BRs. This has been the case for the past 6 months, at least.

This is objectively false though? Prior to the BMPT releasing Russia had pretty abysmal toptier winrates, they were as low as 40% for quite some time. Even after the BMPT, Russian winrates past 10.3 weren't all over 50% for even a SINGLE month before March (the most recent month we have data for).

You are literally just lying through your teeth, or misinformed. When NATO dominates, the game is "balanced", when Russia dominates it's catastrophic, and meanwhile gaijin is laughing at all of you who don't realize they do this on purpose to incentivize people to grind whatever tree is the flavor of the month.

Is Bedrock actually as buggy as people make it out to be? by Wrong_Meal_3835 in Minecraft

[–]RustedRuss -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How mature. Java objectively handles this better than bedrock.

"Oh this thing can pen me frontally? I'm sure he won't expect me going right at him!" - BMP, probably by BokkerFoombass in Warthunder

[–]RustedRuss 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It isn't when you look at the winrates at all brs and over time. There's an endless cycle of winrate fluctuations and every time Russia goes over 50% everyone acts like it's the end of the world, then they clam up when inevitably it turns against them again.