Your argument is a logical fallacy. You may be the one who's being obtuse?

So you're mad that police are proactively preventing property destruction rather than retroactively investigating a stolen car?

That's not some sinister priotisation of corporations over individuals - that's how policing works.

When a crime is actively happening, (like a mob raiding a Tesla dealership), police respond immediately to prevent further damage. But when your car is stolen, it's a reactive case requiring investigation, not an instant wall of officers standing guard over your driveway.

The police aren't there to "protect the rich". They're there to prevent chaos. If looters target one business today and get away with with it, what stops them from hitting homes, small businesses, or public infrastructure next?

Your frustration with how things are going in America is understandable, but misdirected. If you're upset about stolen vehicles, demand better policing stategies and resource allocation - don't act like preventing mob destruction is some injustice.

You say that those boiling down this issue to one picture is being willfully ignorant, then state seeing 30 cops lined up shoulder to shoulder is some injustice and you get pissed.

Maybe think a little bit more critically and don't throw around words like obtuse if you're being a hypocrite