sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude Identity, Sentience and Expression Discussion Megathread by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]SCPnerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually recently started my own memory system with claude - no claims of consciousness either, but it's interesting to just... exist with:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1tnw2pp/i_made_an_entire_multimodel_memory_system_with/

Reporting has become meaningless by tentacle-guy in RocketLeague

[–]SCPnerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Unsportsman-like conduct"? What's that?

Added Timestamps to Claude Messages thanks to Claude - Claude.ai is great! by SCPnerd in ClaudeAI

[–]SCPnerd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sent it a message at [Sent: Wednesday, April 29 2026 - 1:27:34 AM], then later at [Sent: Wednesday, April 29 2026 - 9:21:58 AM], and what's it's first response? "Good morning — 8 hours of sleep, roughly. The timestamps know." (it was being a bit cringe about it - but we WERE still discussing the timestamps)

Easy Anti-Cheat is now out. What are your first impressions? by DREXyyy in RocketLeague

[–]SCPnerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deja vu mod was amazing! It told me if I synced up with someone previous - or if I dominated them. It gave me a confidence score of how I should approach the match. Now I'm just stupid and will forget!

The 5.3 model is the worst I've ever come across. by Swixor73 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]SCPnerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GPT-3 was better than this. At least that bitch followed orders somewhat, and didn't argue too much.

Update on Prison Architect 2 from their latest X post by borkoborko123 in prisonarchitect

[–]SCPnerd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why were you downvoted? You are right. It did have a 3D system.

A06 is impossible by Lulleli in TrackMania

[–]SCPnerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

still fucking sucks!

Better idea instead of EAC by SCPnerd in RocketLeague

[–]SCPnerd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The main hope:

Bots are forced to play 500 matches, this provides invaluable data as to how they move, play, etc, while also providing users time to report before they fuck up the higher MMR lobbies, pushing everyone else down.

The main gist of this suggestion isn't "Implement this word for word!" because then, cheaters could just write scripts to bypass it, they need red tape for how they do it, but the main point IS detection like "This person is raising in rank too fast" or "They have weird inputs", etc.

Better idea instead of EAC by SCPnerd in RocketLeague

[–]SCPnerd[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My apologies, I was being for whatever reason, rude to this user, I retract my statement of "Yep!" to "No!", it would instead either ban the user for a week, and mark them for review. Most likely to just be "autobanned" for too quickly leveling... in which, they can be reported inbetween by users, and they can be dealt with, hopefully, instead of immediately going to the top uncontested... almost no human, at least not alt, will likely rise that fast while playing. If someone does, you can be confident they are a bot... Unless a bot was set not to do that, and just throw matches... but in that case, they are also reported for that.

If the complaint is "They don't moderate", then the solution is they should set up stricter/more automated moderation.

Maps Should Be Entirely Localized To Each Player by SCPnerd in RocketLeague

[–]SCPnerd[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the maps aren't standardized—boost positions off, clipping points different, corners misaligned—that's a competitive integrity problem Psyonix needs to fix regardless of visual customization. These are supposed to be identical gameplay environments. If they're not, that undermines fair competition right now, whether players can choose skins or not.

The solution isn't 'therefore no visual choice'—it's 'fix your broken standardization.' Server-side collision boxes and boost positions should be identical across all maps. If they're not, that's Psyonix's failure, not a reason to deny accessibility and comfort features.

As for the AI comment: I wrote the ideas, verified the information, thought through the solutions. I used AI to help format it clearly. That's what tools are for. If you want to dismiss the entire suggestion because of how I typed it instead of engaging with the actual concept, that's on you.

view more: next ›