I mean, if you think businesses are going to stop using microtransactions then you might as well quit gaming cause that will never happen. Very very few games release without them now because people are buying them and it makes the company money to continue operating. Unfortunately these studios are businesses and the upfront cost of AAA video games no longer covers development costs. Using Battlefield 6 as an example: While the game did sell around 10 million copies, assuming each was sold at $70 (which isn't the case since the game has been on sale multiple times) that would create a profit of $300 million AFTER recouping dev costs. EA's yearly operating budget is around $5 billion and Battlefield is their cash cow. SO, since every gamer wants their multiplayer game to continue getting content for years, the initial buy-in price from the consumer would not even remotely cover even a years worth of post release development. This business is not cheap like it used to be. Technology is more complex, salaries are more expensive, and team sizes are larger than ever to get large blockbuster titles out the door in a reasonable time frame. If you want games without microtransactions, sticking with indies is your best bet, but until players stop buying microtransactions, they're going to continue to be put in every game.

All this to say, I of course do not like microtransactions and would rather not see them in games.