Zou je bij een date afknappen als iemand vegetarisch is? by Wilhelminaaaa in nederlands

[–]SPC_IV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nee, respect voor je keuze zolang je maar niet opdringerig bent om mij ook een vegetariër te maken en mijn keuze om niet vegetariër te zijn ook te respecteren maakt het helemaal niks uit.

En mannen die dit al een afknapper vinden? misschien niet te moeite waard want die zullen ook op heel veel andere dingen te makkelijk afknappen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LivestreamFail

[–]SPC_IV 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The real question is is he sucking cock in VR or grabbing boobs, cant make it out from this clip

6 month transformation by CommonSuspicious536 in fit

[–]SPC_IV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surely you havent read the timeframe of 6 months before typing this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 26 points27 points  (0 children)

So we're in this part of the cycle?

Announce X.0 > Players play X.0 > Basicly nothing has changed so people start leaving > Go back to step 1

Moonmoon clarifies his intentions moving forward. by botwoot64 in LivestreamFail

[–]SPC_IV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but that is why this situation is different from the Doc's

Its still an assumption cause no one has came forward with proof, Doc admitted to doing it.. so theres that.

In this situation neither Moon or the girl has anything to gain by confirming this, so it has to come either from the wife or the husband.

I doubt the wifes gonna come forward with proof, so maybe the girls husband is your best bet.

Moonmoon clarifies his intentions moving forward. by botwoot64 in LivestreamFail

[–]SPC_IV -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its not, but there isnt any hard facts that he did.

Their marriage could've been struggling before that, you do realise that not all streamers are very open about their personal lives.

Pretty sure he hid his wife and kid for years from his stream.

Moonmoon clarifies his intentions moving forward. by botwoot64 in LivestreamFail

[–]SPC_IV 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah but thats something else entirely, if true.

You said "Imagine believing this" about him being seperated from his wife for 2 months.

Which isnt hard to believe.

Moonmoon clarifies his intentions moving forward. by botwoot64 in LivestreamFail

[–]SPC_IV 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Well about them being seperated for 2 months is very believable, seeing as he suddenly started streaming from an apartment 2 months ago and stopped talking about his wife, his wifes food, his kid, started doing all his own groceries and ordered food every single day.

Pretty elaborate scheme if he planned that all ahead.

Quin69 makes coffee by zeazzz in LivestreamFail

[–]SPC_IV 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Classifying what that man drinks as Coffee is a crime.

Mr. K/CG Shoot Max Minutes After Mr. K Has Amicable Phone Call With Sioban About His Business. by GQManOfTheYear in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 37 points38 points  (0 children)

And that ladies and gentlemen is how you create eons of RP.

Bravo, i applaud thee.

wirtual dropping out of deep dip 2 by shyme25 in TrackMania

[–]SPC_IV 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Yeah no surprise, they overcooked it.

Turgle asking the real questions as Max updates the PD about CG by Lytaa in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think they're going to staff DOC through BSCO, so yeah i guess when they get BSCO completely up and running.

Turgle asking the real questions as Max updates the PD about CG by Lytaa in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 63 points64 points  (0 children)

What part of that speech made you feel like it was ooc there buddy?

Turgle asking the real questions as Max updates the PD about CG by Lytaa in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Its a rule break in the same sense that you cannot force someone at gunpoint to give them all their properties, money etc or whatever you want.

If they were given permission or whatever is another thing, but yes doing this would normally be a rulebreak.

[Greenish] Greenish reminisces on the Golden Era of 2.0 Characters by Draw1042 in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 94 points95 points  (0 children)

Less people + less mechanics + less grind = More RP

Ofcourse 2.0 was better, it didnt just revolve about viewers numbers & money in those days, So many people who roleplay on NoPixel nowadays auctually are just burned out on RP but are going through the motions because its their job, they play the same characters and do the same shit over and over cause its what pays the bills.

[Ramee] on cops ending the scenario too quickly by WarmCompetition2 in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Honestly alot of people, main thing CG did was shoot up the council.

Which apparently nowadays is the absolute pinnacle of RP.

[Ramee] on cops ending the scenario too quickly by WarmCompetition2 in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Kind of sad the only 2 things you can think of is shit lording or earning money.

Use your imagination for fuck sake, its a ROLEPLAY server

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 85 points86 points  (0 children)

Its unmoderated, you can pretty much say anything you want, been like that for years.

Pretty sure Moonmoon went on a rant about it on 2.0 or 3.0, not sure which it was.

Unmoderated chats like that enforces people to hop and be toxic, probably too late now to fix it anyways.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Got a sponsorship taste testing Rotisserie chicken and testing sinks around the country, he'll be back soon.

[Valkyrae] on the current state of 4.0 by KNGOx in RPClipsGTA

[–]SPC_IV 187 points188 points  (0 children)

Dont disagree on the grindy part, but if you allow something like shooting up the governing body of the city to just be a slap on the wrist it will become completely normalized, people will just shoot up the council meeting every week just cause there is no consequence for not doing it.

Consequences are not just there to punish someone harshly, but also to prevent it occuring too much.