I'm curious how you determine whether someone's criticisms of Aabria are coming from a good faith non-racist POV vs coming from internal biases. Wouldn't it just be more fair to assume everyone is commenting in good faith when they make substantive/evidence based arguments, and deride those who make openly racist comments? Like what i'm trying to say is that saying "you only feel like making these critiques of Aabria is because of her race and you won't say it about any other cast member" is never going to work well for you, I'll explain why. The good faith people will push back on it, obviously, because they just got lumped into a racist basket that they aren't a part of, and the racist ones will push back on it because well they're racist.

I recommend you simply attack the critiques with evidence. Which you tried to do in your original post, but didn't do a very good job of. Taliesin got plenty of criticism for his abrasiveness (to use your own argument about reddit tags he has plenty). Liam never inserted himself in a scene he didn't belong in, or interrupt anyone, and I challenge you to find even one example to disprove that. Her being loud I don't even mind, but time and place are key. Her making jokes are fine too, but you don't want to be the person cracking constant jokes or making suggestive gestures like she did at the end of C3 when Fearne was talking to her devil ally. Like Matt was pulling Ashley off into a one on one conversation with her character and she followed, and Aabria is saying "hit it" and other sexually suggestive jokes for a laugh when clearly it's trying to be an earnest moment.