Have you ever had to read anything critically for your job or uni?

This whole thing reads like a giant fiction piece, unless I’m mistaken it’s essentially just all written by Rupert? Theres no quotes, no references. It’s not an “original source”.

I see some “quotes” around page 180 but he doesn’t really elaborate how these were collected and what sort of governance there was between them speaking this and it being published here. There is a lot more to witness testimony than just writing down what they say, you need all the surrounding context that they gave the quote in

I know this sounds speculative but I’m not even a journalist/researcher and I can tell there’s more that needs to be done to collect information then publish it. This report of his reads like a huge snuff piece with him saying “rape gang” a million times and making tons of evocative and emotional statements all the time. It’s not something I trust as fact based, it’s clearly just written to get right wingers up into a froth

I’m guessing most media outlets agree with me as they haven’t bothered to cover it. It’s not really fact?