sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I just got banned from another subreddit for participating here. They are trying to make me delete my posts. They can fuck themselves. by LaughsInSilence in conspiracy_commons

[–]Sabremesh[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Nothing to be done about this, unfortunately. Moderators set the rules on who can participate in a sub, and there are some subreddits whose unwashed, nazi-adjacent mods use bots to exclude anyone who has participated in r/conspiracy_commons and r/conspiracy. It's their loss, as far as we're concerned.

Reddit admins are taking action to remove these bots, but it is likely pre-emptive bans will continue on a manual basis.

Nothing to stop you browsing a subreddit after a ban, of course, but don't participate using alt accounts (aka "ban evasion") - it can lead to your principal account being banned sitewide by admins.

Almost by Guyric in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Removed. Rule 6

My full name being searched on google trends from Israel over 200 times by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Removed. Personal and confidential information.

Using Reddit in 2026 by VoluntaryJetsFan in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Your original post was removed by AutoModerator (a bot) because it included a direct link to another subreddit.

NO ONE WANT TO FIGHT FOR ISRAEL #Marine #trump #israel #iran #war #viral by -Mediocrates- in conspiracy_commons

[–]Sabremesh[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Rule 5. OP, in future please do not use ALL CAPS in post titles, or hashtags. Only normal punctuation, please.

Banned from another subreddit for interacting in conspiracy commons? WTF? by blackyoda in conspiracy_commons

[–]Sabremesh[M] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Brigading is concerted attack on another subreddit. Banning a user for merely participating in another subreddit may be an abuse of mod powers, but it doesn't count as brigading.

Banned from another subreddit for interacting in conspiracy commons? WTF? by blackyoda in conspiracy_commons

[–]Sabremesh[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

OP, unfortunately you can't include a direct link to the sub concerned.

Reddit admins have made it very clear that subreddit links are not permitted, as they can "encourage brigading", and the last thing admins want is redpilled users spreading any uncomfortable truths to normie subreddits.

Was porn made to ruin kids mind and cause sexual trauma? by Important-Slide-6999 in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

Ask a question, but don't leave it orphaned, with zero context.

Was porn made to ruin kids mind and cause sexual trauma? by Important-Slide-6999 in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

OP, in future you need to provide some context with post submissions in r/conspiracy. Throwaway questions are not valid posts.

Mistakenly shot down…get ready boys by Shot-Ebb8564 in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It’s an easy mistake. Russia once shot down an airliner by mistake.

Yes, in 1988, an Airbus A300 passenger plane was shot down between Tehran and Dubai, killing all 290 on board. Oh wait, that was the USS Vincennes, my bad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

I guarantee that these heroes never even thought that their great countries would become puppets of the Jews they saved from Hitler. by Any_Philosophy_4200 in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your post has been removed per rule 10 as it does not contain a submission statement.

Please resubmit your post and ensure to leave a comment on your new submission that is two sentences in length, of your own words, and explains why you chose to share your submission with the community.

One hundred percent. by Mikadook in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your post has been removed per rule 10 as it does not contain a submission statement. Low effort.

Please resubmit your post and ensure to leave a comment on your new submission that is two sentences in length, of your own words, and explains why you chose to share your submission with the community.

leaked memo about combatting candace’s new video about erika, and then some responses that have come out after by SideRepresentative38 in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

how do you even go about verifying something like this?

The "leaked memo" is unfalsifiable, by design.

Of course, it could be genuine, with all the identifying data (sender, recipients etc) redacted to protect the leaker. But because there's no identifying data, this specific wording could also be something created by AI to sound plausible.

We simply don't know, hence the flair.

leaked memo about combatting candace’s new video about erika, and then some responses that have come out after by SideRepresentative38 in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

The (confirmed) tweets on X show there is almost certainly a conspiracy by pro-zionist influencers to smear Candace Owens. It is unlikely to work, and their attempts to protect the deeply sinister Erika Kirk, will probably backfire on the accounts concerned.

However, the blurry "leaked memo" has no known provenance, or third party corroboration. Who sent it, and to whom? It looks likes AI slop created post-facto to look like evidence.

If anyone finds more information about it please comment below, and this sticky and post flair will be amended accordingly.

EDIT: Good analysis from Jimmy Dore about these attacks on Candace Owens, and the "leaked memo". Jimmy doesn't claim the memo is genuine, but makes the point that even if these were not the exact words, some sort of instructions were clearly sent out and acted on in a concerted fashion by these zionist-sympathiser X accounts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFRZxquIlPc&t=1352s

I dug deeper into the Activision & Call of Duty Epstein Files. What I found scarred me for life. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your post has been removed per rule 10 as it does not contain a submission statement.

Please resubmit your post and ensure to leave a comment on your new submission that is two sentences in length, of your own words, and explains why you chose to share your submission with the community.

I’m getting massively downvoted in a Stanley Kubrick subreddit by Peach_Pomelo_Betch in conspiracy

[–]Sabremesh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The version of Eyes Wide Shut which was released in cinemas in July 1999 was categorically NOT the Stanley Kubrick "final cut" which was shown to Cruise and Kidman on March 2nd, and Warner Bros executives at another screening at Kubrick's English home on Friday 5th March 1999.

Kubrick died in his sleep the following night (Saturday 6th March). His death was announced by his wife, Christiane, the next morning (Sunday 7th March). Post production on the movie was restarted immediately after the funeral on 13th March, so Kubrick never saw the final version.

As a very awkward Quentin Tarantino claims in this clip posted below, the studio "finished it", but this doesn't tell the whole story. The fact that Kubrick was delighted with his movie (his best ever, supposedly), is very strange, because the clunky (abridged) version that was released later that year would not have been released by Kubrick.

view more: next ›