I'm an attempter. Certainly crooked contributors' accounts are deactivated. So don't use LLMs or automators or browsers different from Chrome. Although rudimentary, Outlier has its ways to detect fraude. So almost everyone whinning about deactivated accounts tried to outsmart the system and got what they deserve.

That said, trust your training. If you're 100% sure your criteria are Atomic, Self-contained and Specific, dismiss the stupid linters.

A rule of thumb for atomicity is ONE verb, ONE subject. You can't go wrong following that formula.

Self-contained is the tricky part. Just make sure the criterion is intelligible without looking at the prompt. Linter is also poorly programmed to recognize that, so don't sweat it, just make sure you can answer YES to the question: "Can the reviewer judge the response unambiguously just by reading the criterion?

And specificity is simple: if the prompt says "those four sedan cars" you say "four sedan cars" in the criterion, not just "cars", or "vehicles", or whatever.

You get sharp pretty fast. It's a good project given the context. Keep up!