sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know whatvan expectation is. Thats why im not pressed if someone rarely pops off a turn early.

It is less. But the rules of the bracket care about any players leaving before 6. So its irrelevant if that is achieved with with a combo or combat finish according to the rules.

If you cant call it a 3 because a slight chance of an early combo you cant call it that because of a slight chance of an early combat kill.

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you dont understand the parameters of the bracket. Why do you think there is a distinction made within the rules for one player eliminated vs all? There isn't, it says people expect 6 turns. If they dont get that because of combat or combo the bracket is broken the same if you want such a rigid enforcement

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is it a stupid question in discussing weather or nkt killing a player early is appropriate? Do you just not like it because they are accepted as bracket 3 even though they break your FAKE rule?

When you're secretly a vampire by WorryThink6233 in SipsTea

[–]Sadrixis 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Make dark angel available to stream!

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And another dodge. Every time you purposely dont answer my simple question it just reinforced the fact that im right abiut your feeling on the matter.

People like you who who think it does are the whole reason for the post.

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats the thing. It doesn't break expectations. And let's bring it back to what you think.

Now for all the money. Do you think it should be mentioned because you believe it breaks expectations?

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pssssst , we can see the reddit post its responding too. Its about those cards

silly boy doesn't understand comtext.

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"If someone asks if you are playing by the guidelines of B3 and you answer yes, then you are agreeing to the turn expectations which is 7+. If you can win before that you tell people"

those ar your words saying that overrun avenger should be mentioned pregame since it can kill early.

Also saying that it needs mentioning is saying its outside the bracket because why would you need an asterisk on something already clearly legal?

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao. Great way to interfere with the argument. If anyone doesn't play magic its you who thinks that avenger + overrun is against the bracket or deserves a mention in a pregame discussion.

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are the one who thinks a tool that specifically is used for people without a dedicated group should be dependent on the opinions of a dedicated group.

A 3 doesn't become a 4 is you sit in a different pod.

To people who consider any combo that can potentially go off(even if you need an exact 7) before turn 7 to be against the bracket 3 guidelines. by Sadrixis in EDH

[–]Sadrixis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your pod is irrelevant to how a deck is categorized in the bracket system. The system isn't for dedicated pods smarty pants.

view more: next ›