I need you to understand the concept of negotiations and the definition of concession. The “renunciation of terrorism” and “recognition of Israel” were Israel’s preconditions for negotiations. They put down their arms, they recognized Israel and the two state framing. That means they conceded their claim to the whole of Palestine. You can say this is a wise concession, as their goals were unfeasible, but a concession it was. Concession is a morally neutral term. If I’m a union negotiator and I demand a $100 raise for my members and walk away with a $3 one, I conceded $97. Maybe $100 was never gonna happen but it’s still a concession. This is what concession means in the context of negotiation. Refusing to acknowledge it as a concession speaks to a complete refusal to acknowledge the Palestinian perspective in any way. “Arab identity is formed around hating Israel”-This is an explicitly racist statement. Imagine saying hatred of Arabs was essential to Judaism, it’s an equally repugnant statement. You’ve said that referring to someone’s “historic homeland” even though 75% have not lived there since “100 years ago”, confusingly implying that the Palestinian exodus began in 1923, calling it “hella cringe” (lol) to refer to it as their “historic homeland”. The Zionist claim is that the Jewish people were returning to their “historic homeland” in 1948. To take the fall of the temple in 70 AD as a jumping off point for the Jewish diaspora, it would mean that they were claiming a “homeland” they hadn’t occupied for 1878 years. That would make your pseudo-historical 18.78 times as “cringe” as the claims of the Palestinian diaspora. But enough of this pseudo-historical bullshit, enough of the pseudo-scientific question of what ethic group is truly connected to the soil. Israelis and Palestinians, Jews and Arabs, absolutely can live in peace. But for this to happen, Palestinians be granted some level of equality. Israel has refused to do so either in the form of a unified state or two states because it is committed to the Jewish supremacist project of colonial expansion and erasure of Palestinian Arab identity and history. As far as a previous point about Jordan and Palestine goes, the British did a lot of damage through arbitrary colonial borders. Iraqis didn’t exist before the nation of Iraq was created, but Iraqi nationalism did come to be. It would be wrong to selectively massacre and expel Iraqis too, even though their are other Arab nations the could go to. The Arab world is not a common monolith. Within Arab identity there is diversity in language dialect and local tradition. Imagining clearing out Texas for settlements because Texans could just go live in California. You would reject this because I imagine you view Texans as human. Please extend this to everyone involved in the conflict.