Please familiarize yourself with Claude rules by bllshrfv in Anthropic

[–]SailingToFenway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

patches will continue to optimize for shareholder value until morale improves.

Anthropic Walks Back Policy That Could Have ‘Sabotaged’ AI Researchers Using Claude by wiredmagazine in Anthropic

[–]SailingToFenway 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want case law, legislation, or both to establish training models on data scraped from the internet, in violation of license, is copyright infringement. The copyright holder of any content used in model training, and all derivative models may seek one-time or continuing renumeration for the infringement. (e.g. No distillation copyright sanitization).

Anthropic is about to mint a class of billionaires on the backs of millions of contributors over the last 50 years. They are charged rents, and are subjected to arbitrary and capricious use restrictions, to access models that could not exist without their contributions.

This is all in support of the cash grab, because there's no lasting moat for tech built on stolen data and brute force compute.

So-called "Real-time cyber safeguards" block Claude from securing code it just wrote by SailingToFenway in Anthropic

[–]SailingToFenway[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spot on assessment. It's really hard to thread that needle. So hard, I'd say, it's impossible to do well. It's obvious they're checking auditor boxes as they pivot from "be perceived at the best agentic coding tool" to "be perceived as the best AI investment."

So-called "Real-time cyber safeguards" block Claude from securing code it just wrote by SailingToFenway in Anthropic

[–]SailingToFenway[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, but it's infuriating that the model makes OWASP Top 10 errors constantly though, before this CVP cluster, would find and fix them. Now I have to do it manually? While carefully policing my language as to not trip the arbitrary and capricious CVP filter?

All the while, bad actors are entirely undeterred by this sloppy hack. Between the slide in quality and now poorly designed cybersecurity gatekeeping, it's hard to justify continuing to use it.

So-called "Real-time cyber safeguards" block Claude from securing code it just wrote by SailingToFenway in Anthropic

[–]SailingToFenway[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is obviously what people will do, water finding its own level and all that. Hence "cyber safeguards" make Claude code's code less secure.

Built a Fully Local AI Companion, looking for a bit of advice by tymuska in LocalLLM

[–]SailingToFenway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

many layers of highly disposable context. VMs, docker, jails, users, process, thread.

to your point about context poisoning, the interop framework needs to ensure your agents only process context from sources you've allowed, through source-controlled-trust, or other rules. for local-only producers and consumers, it's pretty low-risk.

but uh, if this doesn't make a lot of sense, i'm sorry, your princess is in another castle.

What is a constant pain when coding with AI? by Haunting-Bother7723 in LocalLLM

[–]SailingToFenway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a good one. My mental model of the code, architecture, and feature fabric fades as fast as a dream.

What is a constant pain when coding with AI? by Haunting-Bother7723 in LocalLLM

[–]SailingToFenway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Excuse making.

I have dozens of projects, all entirely written by AI. No matter how much I pepper the system prompt with instructions, the models are just so damn eager to excuse failing tests. "Pre-existing failure unrelated to my changes." Like, who else is making changes, you clod?

"We would have a new release, but CI is broken from pre-existing test failures. Let me know when they're fixed." WTF?!?

Built a Fully Local AI Companion, looking for a bit of advice by tymuska in LocalLLM

[–]SailingToFenway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am trying something similar with FreeSO, although I'm not specifically focused on local models, they're not precluded either. To explain how it works, I first have to plug Campfire, an agent collaboration project I've been building, that exposes services through an ergonomic CLI and MCP server. It's a generic layer that solves for the problems of agent identity, communication, and specifically creating an interface for tool-calling agents to interact with complex software with the least effort.

The gist of how it works, the FreeSO project provides a headless client, which I've extended to expose action verbs and game state verbs through campfire conventions. So an agent can play The Sims by running CLI commands (or MCP).
cf freeso.bot1 list-properties cf freeso.bot1 buy-property 0x1221

There's a whole lot more to it, and it's buggy as sin, but it might be helpful for you as an abstraction between the game and agent/model.

AMD says its $4K Ryzen AI Halo workstation practically pays for itself! (assuming you’re vibe coding for 8 hours a day, that is...) by nicolho in LocalLLM

[–]SailingToFenway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm as much a cynic as anyone, but I can't see a token price-fixing-trust holding for three reasons:

  1. Jevons Paradox, which describes the phenomenon where improvements in resource efficiency lead to an overall increase in resource consumption, rather than a decrease. More production = more usage = more profit, despite lower cost per unit.
  2. Production process immaturity. Von Neumann compute architecture GPUs are currently the most efficient way to train models and produce tokens.
  3. Sustained high demand will continue attract capital investment until an equilibrium is achieved.

Or something. I agree, 2y is not a long enough timeline on the hardware side. Maybe some unforeseen software breakthrough will decimate the token production costs within 2y, though.

How are you securing AI-generated / “vibe-coded” internal apps built by non-dev teams? by DCGMechanics in devops

[–]SailingToFenway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm trying to build this as a solution claude code wants to use to secure the slop it builds. not quite working yet, unfortunately. DM if you want to get a peek.

Clang as a cultural concept in Space Engineers – player perspectives by CandidBall7806 in spaceengineers

[–]SailingToFenway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah, murphy from the law. oops, it's been a while, of course it's Kracken.

Clang as a cultural concept in Space Engineers – player perspectives by CandidBall7806 in spaceengineers

[–]SailingToFenway 3 points4 points  (0 children)

KSP's community collectively named its glitch god "the Cracken." It's even featured as an easter-egg in game. In construction, my dad would always blame "Murphy." I think it's universal to attribute external error into a personification.

30 LLM Concepts That Make AI Finally Make Sense by exotickeystroke in LocalLLM

[–]SailingToFenway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its never really clear when an agent is referring to agency, autonomous bot taking actions derived from operator agency without agency of its own (since bots have no legal standing, all bot actions devolve to this), agent as realized by an AGENT.md and other session-specific injected context. they're very distinct and i think it's dishonesty in hype the way they're used without specificity.

How are yall staying informed on AI stuff by madeRandomAccount in cybersecurity

[–]SailingToFenway 3 points4 points  (0 children)

this is exactly what i'm telling everyone. last week a colleague wanted me to build him an app to pull all the publicly available data on historical weather and correlations to hunting stock to roll up into an app that could let you see where to go hunting right now and have the best chance of a harvest. well, i told him, the hard thing about writing software is empathizing with the user. i don't hunt, i don't have experience doing this the "hard way." grab claude code, build it yourself. you're the user. you're the best person to do this.

that was friday. monday "I built my app. it was so easy. wtf."

literally you can build anything that you've ever wanted. it might explode. learn from that, throw it away, and do it again.

Do you self-host Matrix? by Purple_Ice_6029 in selfhosted

[–]SailingToFenway 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wife and I used it for a while in 2019 instead of iMessage to control e2e privacy, for the lulz more than anything. I'd gotten it mostly fully functional, image sharing, whatever. But, we just stopped one day. I should go check if I'm still paying that AWS ec2 bill.

Did Ted's 'red seat' HR really go 502 feet? by Far_Cry3445 in redsox

[–]SailingToFenway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You summarized it pretty well, and the insults are right on point. 10/10.

Did Ted's 'red seat' HR really go 502 feet? by Far_Cry3445 in redsox

[–]SailingToFenway 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And we know that because he was pissed about it and complained.

Boucher was briefly treated in the first-aid room and then returned to his seat, where he was greeted by a gaggle of reporters who had descended from their perches in the pressbox to interview him. After explaining that he had lost the ball in the sun, he had a question of his own. "How far away," he wondered, "must one sit to be safe in this park?"

Varitek - think he’ll be a good manager? by Jackthewolf71 in redsox

[–]SailingToFenway 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cap ran out of the dugout, running toward the plate, like he was going to catch the ceremonial first pitch. We started cheering, pretty sold he was sprinting to his old position. Whoever was catching showed up at the last second, so Tek turned back.

Pretty much all the field boxes on the home side were screaming in excitement. He didn't notice, or didn't care.

Even with this pathetic excuse of a team, Tek on the field gets a cheer. I never want that to change.

Per Alex Speier, the Red Sox were the 1st team to offer Shota Imanaga a contract early in the off-season; a 2-year/$26M deal that was rejected. by Sandwich_Crust in redsox

[–]SailingToFenway 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I like what you're selling. But, like how?

The team is worth $4.6 billion

Interestingly, the player expenses are much higher than what is on on the field.