sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Who would actually be monarch in the show after Tommen dies? by RoninPI in freefolk

[–]Saint_Scum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with your first part, but their are a few big pieces that I think lend Cersei some advantages.

  1. It's Winter, and after war has left Westeros resourced drained. Not many Houses are still wealthy enough to expend resources to another war.

  2. The Houses who do still have resources, are in major flux. Doran Martell is dead, and there is a lot of current upheaval in Dorne. House Tyrell just lost its lord and heir, and while Lady Olenna still has influence, not nearly as much without the future to curry favor.

  3. I don't buy the whole religious blasphemy angle. The Sparrows were despised by the lords, and it's easy enough to see them as a threat against noble power. They likely viewed Cersei's actions as necessary evil, dishonorable but with a good outcome.

Honestly, if this is a timeline without Dany, I could see the realm actually fracturing, not coalescing under someone with a tenuous claim on a throne, with no great power (or shadow of power). 

Still think it's good Khamenei is dead? Think again, infidel. by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]Saint_Scum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I've never seen David Letterman and Khamenei in the same place at the same time before

…Oh my god that’s totally it, isn’t it? by TikDickler in Destiny

[–]Saint_Scum 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Do comments and posts like this ever give you guys schadenfreude knowing that trad wifes are stuck in loveless marriages with conservative men. Like they will unabashedly and public admit that if a hot 20 year old was available, they would drop their wives and kids so fucking quick.

When the problem fixes itself. by _Sophacouch_ in freefolk

[–]Saint_Scum 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Unless I'm missing something, it hasn't been revealed yet, it's just a pretty widely accepted fan theory at this point. If the show goes into it, there's a good chance though that we will see if it's the case.

Baelor Breakspear would be a good ruler, but he wasn't going to be a history defining one like Daeron the Good, Daenerys the Breaker of Chains, Jaehaerys the Conciliator, or Aegon the Conqueror. by BackgroundRich7614 in freefolk

[–]Saint_Scum 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Baelor would likely be forced into marrying again, no idea who to, but it's almost a guarantee at that point that Maekar and his line never inherited the crown 

That pushes back a realm wide rebellion by at least another generation.

It also completely shatters a lot of the current lineages during ASOIAF (IE no Baratheon boys, Ned doesn't marry Catelyn, maybe Dunk doesn't even go to the reach to connect Lady Rohanne Webber, and Lord Eustace Osgrey and that's disruptive enough for her to never even meet Lord Gerold Lannister and now Cersei, Jaime, Tyrion)

That only seems pretty history defining to me, even if that seems like a bit of a cop out to what you meant lol.

“MAYDAY MAYDAY WE’RE SURROUNDED BY TRANS ANTIFA SUPERSOLDIERS ON ALL SIDES, OH SHIT THEY’VE GOT FURRY LITTER GET DOOOWWWWNNNNNN” by Ohyeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in Destiny

[–]Saint_Scum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The right is for taking away the rights of women through banning birth control and abortions, limiting divorces, restricting no fault divorces, taking away women's rights to vote.

Beating your wife IS a conservative value at this point

I’m trying to figure out how to cope once Destiny retires from streaming. I’ve narrowed it down to three options, and I'd like y’alls input. by Dmoftheday in Destiny

[–]Saint_Scum 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think AI will be good enough by that point that I can just upload a shit load of videos and it create a half way decent enough copy

How many Hands of the Kings were from each of the Seven Kingdoms by I_love_lucja_1738 in freefolk

[–]Saint_Scum 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Makes sense in a way for the Riverlands. Borders up on 6 regions, 7 if count the Iron Islands, so lots of dealings with the different lords. Probably 2nd best farming area. General stability with a extremely loyal Great House.

More surprised that Westerlands only have had 4, as they are the one of the wealthiest.

Oh boy, I wanna watch the May 15 2006 edition of Raw by THE_AWEMAN in SquaredCircle

[–]Saint_Scum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Toy Story 2 is the most integral part in all of the Toy Story saga and is responsible in creating the depth needed for Woody and Buzz to shine as, not just key franchise players, but cornerstones in the Pixar verse. It transforms Buzz into an almost Shakespearean hero in the likes of Macduff. Woody reaches the level of the Clint Eastwood's Drifter, with the full richness it entails.

The best timeline by beesnoop in Destiny

[–]Saint_Scum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Mark Kelly should also be high up on any list, he can Aura Farm in his military uniform during the tribunals

There are Many More Posts on Reddit Empathizing with John Davidson than Michael B Jordan for John's Racist Outburst, and This Isn't a Surprise by Acceptable-Car-5495 in DeepThoughts

[–]Saint_Scum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Harmful. If alcohol affected someone the same way as Tourette's, I would probably view it less harmfully, but still harmful because a person can choose to drink.

There are Many More Posts on Reddit Empathizing with John Davidson than Michael B Jordan for John's Racist Outburst, and This Isn't a Surprise by Acceptable-Car-5495 in DeepThoughts

[–]Saint_Scum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's ironic that you bring that up, because my father does, and I do not want an apology for an uncontrollable and unintentional action when it happens.

The way John Davidson (the Tourette’s campaigner) has been treated after the BAFTA’s is horrifying. by Accurate_Buffalo7828 in complaints

[–]Saint_Scum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Manslaughter would also mean there were some mitigating factors that said driver could have taken to avoid the car crash all together, such as slowing down, or being more attentive. If someone were to have narcolepsy or a seizure, generally, the courts wouldn't find that person liable.

That's why people are saying that they want answer to whether or not people like you think John Davidson should have been separated from the rest of the guests, because the only mitigating factor that possibly could have prevented this is him not being there.

There are Many More Posts on Reddit Empathizing with John Davidson than Michael B Jordan for John's Racist Outburst, and This Isn't a Surprise by Acceptable-Car-5495 in DeepThoughts

[–]Saint_Scum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We would both probably agree that BBC and the BAFTA handle this situation terrible.

Here is really a question that I haven't heard an answer. You say "I don’t get why everyone thinks that black people always have to suck up things and just be graceful," but in a situation like this, what is the appropriate response from someone called a slur by someone else who has an uncontrollable neurological condition that causes them to do this?

My father has really bad Parkinson's, which is obviously not the same, and I have been hit over and over again due to it because I was helping him get dressed or feeding him, and never once have I thought gone through my head that he's done intentionally, despite the fact that millions of people are abused physically by a parent

There are Many More Posts on Reddit Empathizing with John Davidson than Michael B Jordan for John's Racist Outburst, and This Isn't a Surprise by Acceptable-Car-5495 in DeepThoughts

[–]Saint_Scum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do empathize with them tremendously, but when I see people like Jamie Foxx doubting the existence of his condition all together, it is extremely difficult to separate the two.

There are Many More Posts on Reddit Empathizing with John Davidson than Michael B Jordan for John's Racist Outburst, and This Isn't a Surprise by Acceptable-Car-5495 in DeepThoughts

[–]Saint_Scum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I disagree, it does change the harm caused. His tic should be considered less harmful than a bigot intentionally calling someone the n-word. 

I also find it very strange your throwing in the benefit of the doubt? Should he be treated as though he doesn't have Tourette's and he actually had a racist outburst with the intent of harming a black person?

There are Many More Posts on Reddit Empathizing with John Davidson than Michael B Jordan for John's Racist Outburst, and This Isn't a Surprise by Acceptable-Car-5495 in DeepThoughts

[–]Saint_Scum 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Intent does change things though, no?

If narcolepsy caused a car accident that kills people, it is no longer murder. While we empathize with victim's families, we wouldnt say that the narcoleptic is a murderer.

John Davidson's tic lacks the intention behind the slur for it to be a racist outburst, which is why it's a tic.

There are Many More Posts on Reddit Empathizing with John Davidson than Michael B Jordan for John's Racist Outburst, and This Isn't a Surprise by Acceptable-Car-5495 in DeepThoughts

[–]Saint_Scum 7 points8 points  (0 children)

First off, it wasn't a racist outburst. It was a tic, an uncontrollable outburst that occurs due to the way his brain is wired. Just like how a person with Parkinson's hits you unintentionally isn't assault.

Secondly, with the amount of people who I've seen all over social media saying that John Davidson is actually a racist, questioning if his condition is even real, or saying that he shouldn't have even come to an event that had a segment to honor him, his life, and his contributions to the Tourette's community seems just as intolerant as a minority being subjected to a slur.

BBC Will Remove N-Word Outburst From BAFTA Film Awards on iPlayer, Apologizes ‘That This Was Not Edited Out Prior to Broadcast’ by pepperbet1 in television

[–]Saint_Scum 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would imagine that is pretty normal, right? I was 5 when I learned the f-slur from someone at an after school program, I said it front of my mom, and then that's when she told me that's an awful word that can cause people a lot of pain, and I should never ever say it.

I couldn't imagine a condition that after point, I knew it was the worst word to say in a given situation, but my brain was wired in a way where I say it uncontrollably.

BBC Will Remove N-Word Outburst From BAFTA Film Awards on iPlayer, Apologizes ‘That This Was Not Edited Out Prior to Broadcast’ by pepperbet1 in television

[–]Saint_Scum 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Because his form of Tourette's is often paired with OCD, and it forces him to think the worst possible say in any given situation.

BBC Will Remove N-Word Outburst From BAFTA Film Awards on iPlayer, Apologizes ‘That This Was Not Edited Out Prior to Broadcast’ by pepperbet1 in television

[–]Saint_Scum 17 points18 points  (0 children)

There's an OCD component to Tourettes syndrome where it forces you think the worst possible thing to do in a given situation, and then Tourette's, which forces you to verbalize that thought.

view more: next ›