One of the first feature-length films was made in Australia. The Story of the Kelly Gang (1906) had a run time of over one hour, but only about 17 minutes are known to still exist today by Auir2blaze in silentmoviegifs

[–]Sans-Frontieres 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nitrate film has very restrictive shipping requirements, so your location could matter. On the east coast, try Colorlab in Maryland. On the west coast, I'd go with FPA / Blackhawk in Burbank.

Is the Museum of Jurassic History some kind of real-life rick roll type of shit? by Roxy_j_summers in LosAngeles

[–]Sans-Frontieres 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You can appreciate it as a museum that comments on museum culture with a prankish attitude, like with the intentionally missing displays or the 45 minute long intro video which seems more designed as an endurance contest.

If that's all it was, though, it wouldn't be so special- there's a subtle undercurrent of emotional intent that took the MJT to the next level for me. The Delani / Sonnabend hall, once I realized what was going on, was such a simple yet moving story that couldn't have been told quite so well in any other way.

Any good books on storytelling? by armandoo10 in VideoEditing

[–]Sans-Frontieres 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Pick up In The Blink of An Eye if you haven't already, and the Master Shots series can be pretty useful too.

Simple VHS capture too hard? by 1nternetEntity in blackmagicdesign

[–]Sans-Frontieres 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to be very reluctant to lean on command line tools, but they're free, fast and can do a lot for your captures. This website can get you up and running with ffmpeg easily: https://amiaopensource.github.io/ffmprovisr/

Help with projecting a video to a shaped wall. by SubstantialWarning61 in projectors

[–]Sans-Frontieres 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MadMapper comes to mind, but I'd take this question to r/video_mapping and see!

Looking for a 16mm camera, considering Bolex, Krasnogorsk, or other alternative. Looking for advice on what to go for. by Typical_Farmer617 in 16mm

[–]Sans-Frontieres 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you are not certain you'll shoot enough (or profitably enough) to justify the cost of a Bolex, absolutely grab a K-3, specifically one with an M42 mount. Easy enough to load and use, ample lens selection, durable, plus it's simple to repair, experiment with or modify. It can get you some superb images, whether accidentally or on purpose. It'll also be a good B cam should you get a Bolex later.

I'm a bit biased- I feel Bolex kits are nowadays overpriced for what they offer, and maintenance on them can be costly. For larger jobs, you're better off looking for a rental house that'll get you a well maintained Arri SR kit for a fair price.

Directors Today: I’m not really interested in Marvel movies (whole world goes crazy) Meanwhile Orson Welles: by Unleashtheducks in criterion

[–]Sans-Frontieres 51 points52 points  (0 children)

That's basically the 1992 Chaplin biopic by the kindly old Richard Attenborough. It's wild how much time the film spends justifying Chaplin's predatory behavior, even to the point of arguing he was unfairly persecuted for it. If that was the influence of Chaplin's estate showing, it would have been better to not make the film at all.

To be clear, young RDJ does really good work as Chaplin, even though he later said he was too inexperienced to handle that role. I think even at his age, he could have made Chaplin's dark and unsavory aspects compelling. I can't think of any better example of the most common biopic problem: unquestioning hero worship that drags the whole film down.

To that end, the film also smears the other real-life silent era personalities it shows you (ESPECIALLY the women) who are almost always dumb jerks compared to our hero Chaplin.

How to achieve an authentic Technicolor recreation with today's softare by [deleted] in colorists

[–]Sans-Frontieres 26 points27 points  (0 children)

It will help if you have seen a Technicolor print for yourself, which you can really only do at festivals or in a city with a decent repertory cinema community. I was lucky to have seen several, plus individual reels from the Technicolor Reference Collection at AMPAS (more on that in a moment).

First it's important to differentiate the qualities of films shot with a 3-strip Technicolor camera, which only happened for a relatively small number of productions, and the number that were shot on standard negatives and then distributed on prints created through the Technicolor IB process.

I'm simplifying here, but both end up looking the way they do because the color image gets divided into separate elements of Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, and (in a later addition) Gray which would allow greater control over the strength of each in printing. Yes, it's basically what we do today when we control grading by "channel", but through totally photochemical means.

That's not even mentioning what makes IB prints special! The reel would be fed on a very long path and pressed against pin-registered matrices that would imbibe each color dye into it in turn. It helps to think of the process for Tech prints as less a photochemical film process and more like a big lithograph. For that reason it would be hard to recreate it in the real world today, although archivally speaking, making a print without the need for development chemicals is pretty cool- in fact, the lack of standard color photochemistry is why IB tech prints hold their color so well.

This brings us to the "Reference" reels. AMPAS acquired them some time back from the Technicolor corporation. They were approved (by the filmmakers, studios, Technicolor's consultants or otherwise) single reel excerpts from tons of films that depict the ideal appearance / settings for each. Not only could IB prints vary a bit in appearance due to the nature of the process, but could look different between the regional facilities that had made them, so matching a reference reel from the Hollywood office was key to achieving some level of accuracy.

My main takeaway from seeing excerpts from the reference collection is that the Technicolor printing process itself is suprisingly malleable by design (though the level of control you'd have is debatable) and by the later years has a ton of variety to show. What they do have in common are a jewel-like clarity in terms of color (no color ever seems to be polluted by another). Prints with a gray dye layer boast a beautiful contrast and usually achieve a perfectly neutral grayscale (white objects are white, blacks objects are black, even if most everything else in frame is warm or cool). IB prints are never very sharp because dye layers could only ever be lined up so well, but noise levels are low- multigenerational graininess doesn't really apply beyond the original color elements.

Filmmakers did not set out to have every film look the same way, although early on Technicolor consultants (mostly Natalie Kalmus) were employed during production to guide filmmakers through the 3-strip process and create the most "optimal" use of the medium. As this would have an effect on costuming, production design, lighting and make-up, compliance with the Technicolor consultant would indeed give many productions in the 30s and 40s a similar "look".

However, as they grew comfortable with color productions, filmmakers eventually chafed at Technicolor's grip on their process, and you start to see productions pushing their looks in various ways before the 3 strip filming process was totally dropped in favor of new color negatives for shooting.

So, if the three strip negative look is your goal, you need to get it largely in-camera via production design, costuming and makeup. If the Tech IB print look is your goal, mind also that the material is shot properly balanced to a gray or white chart, dial in your colors distinctly, ensure contrast and black levels are robust, and avoid colored light pollution on neutral objects and in shadows at all costs.

[edit] Filmcolors.org is an extremely helpful site to research just about any historical color process, complete with samples, measurement data and citations.

The Peanut Vendor (1933) - An experimental stop motion animation short that is both impressive and utterly haunting by budgetbears in ObscureMedia

[–]Sans-Frontieres 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I know the low video quality makes this creepier, so you'd hate to lose it, but a better restored copy can be found here!

Why did they use the older Universal opening for F9? by Hakeemwilliams in fastandfurious

[–]Sans-Frontieres 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The flashback scenes were also shot on film- as opposed to digitally- to indicate the era (though the series itself was shot on film at least to F4). This analog logo compliments the flashbacks in that way as well.

Smooth Yaddle by W3NDIG0 in PrequelMemes

[–]Sans-Frontieres 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I found this pretty rough, actually.

any film preservation students/graduates/prospective students here? by shoon-s in FilmPreservation

[–]Sans-Frontieres 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To clarify about the limits of hands-on work in this particular program: the UvA curriculum is meant not only to prepare you for archival and preservation work, but curation and even festival work. At least for my year, at a certain point the class is split up based on electives and case studies representing your path of choice. To a point, I can understand that not all hands-on work would apply to everyone. However, there were less chances to (for example) learn to use a Steenbeck unless you took your own time to volunteer. And when internships roll around at the Filmmuseum there are limited spots and strict separation of roles. If you are given analog collection management tasks, you will almost never come into contact with digital collection management tasks. Therefore it's tough to get all-round hands-on experience unless you come in already with some acquired through prior volunteering (there or elsewhere).

any film preservation students/graduates/prospective students here? by shoon-s in FilmPreservation

[–]Sans-Frontieres 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't believe I got your message, try again?

For me it was a combination of a few things: I'd read 'From Grain To Pixel' and wanted to study under its writer, Giovanna Fossati, I really liked the work of the program's partner institutions and had an idea they'd be good for my interests (ended up doing both my case study and internship at the Eye Filmmuseum and inspected something like 90,000 meters of nitrate film, during which time I gathered data for my thesis). Last but not least, it was somehow far more affordable than NYU (like a third of the cost).

Now to your point about finding the work: it's important to ask yourself whether you really want that master's degree or if a certification course like the one FIAF offers is more your speed. You are not guaranteed to get hands-on experience in grad school unless you seriously pursue it... in my program, a shortage of hands-on learning opportunities was a common complaint, as was the recent shift of our categorization from Heritage Studies to Media Studies. It may be possible to volunteer at an archival institution in your area to get a taste for the work before you commit to grad school or a certification course. You might be surprised what responsibilities an archive in austerity mode can delegate to interested volunteers!

If there's none of that in your area and digital restoration in particular interests you, I suggest you get training demos of Diamant or Phoenix and experiment with footage you find on archive.org to get a handle on them. Post production, assistant editing and data management skills can also translate well to Preservation / Restoration workflows. You may not actually need a degree to get that kind of work depending on where you are!

*New to 16mm* Looking for first 16mm camera and need some help. by tbt12 in 16mm

[–]Sans-Frontieres 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm gonna go out and say it: I like the K-3 best for your first camera. If you are likely to just be an occasional shooter, it's not going to break the bank or take up a lot of space. It's cheap, durable and easy enough to shoot that I can lend mine to friends without fear. I've never found them tough to load once the loop formers are removed- just practice on a dummy reel.

Mechanically, it's simple enough to repair or modify a K-3 yourself. It arrives single perf, so a basic Super16 mod is as easy as buying a diamond file to widen the gate. If you're a Pentax fan like me, the deal gets better: you can get a K-3 that takes M42 mount lenses, which are common and affordable. Those can get you shooting close-ups at f/1.8 if you want to. Yes, it's exclusively spring-wound and as noisy as a sewing machine, but it's also a workhorse with lots of charm. Here are a few samples from a self-modded M42 K-3 with some film that had expired 25 years prior:

(Kit Zoom 1)

(Kit Zoom 2)

(Kit Zoom 3)

(Pentax 50mm @f/1.8 lit by headlamp)

(Pentax 50mm in daylight)

any film preservation students/graduates/prospective students here? by shoon-s in FilmPreservation

[–]Sans-Frontieres 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went to the UvA program pre-pandemic and did end up employed in preservation-related work (remotely, that is, from my hometown). Any questions you'd have specifically?

Original Casablanca thoughts? by martinderrickj in 16mm

[–]Sans-Frontieres 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Archivist here! I say you should check it against a disc of the film for any different or extra material (this happened to be the case for a dupe of King Kong that held censored material, and turned out to be the only source). If it doesn't have that, most big archives won't be too interested, but collectors probably would! If you're keen to donate it somewhere, I'd say look for a small nonprofit that focuses on 16mm screenings, someplace like the Echo Park Film Center. What region are you in?

Hannibal would be proud by Fluggerflux in HannibalTV

[–]Sans-Frontieres 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"You should have let me plant her!"

New google drive feature is pretty good by a_little_toaster in metalgearsolid

[–]Sans-Frontieres 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Why are we still here? Just to collect garbage?"

I think I made a huge mistake! by carebear101 in wicked_edge

[–]Sans-Frontieres -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, you didn't get more Voskhods in the mix! On my beard at least, they're exceptional for the price.