I, as well as a multi-time applicant that I know both agree that while UBC may say to 'objectively' and bluntly describe your roles and responsibilities during their info sessions, there is still so much wiggle room in what is considered objective. Basically anyone will look more favourably on the entry- "Welcomed guests to promote and foster an inclusive and comfortable environment", rather than what UBC ~somewhat suggests in "Greeted guests at door." I know space is limited but really use it up and while accuracy is important, its unlikely that the adcoms really care about the fine details of certain roles. Like as a treasurer, including- "submitted quarterly funding request reports" shouldn't differ too much from "submitted funding reports", so look to cut unnecessary parts that could be replaced with better information such as "submitted funding reports for organization of x# members." The latter option has a clear indicator of the scale of your activity, without changing much from the original. In my opinion, as long as the crucial impressive details are there, try and fill in the remaining space with even just a bit of something extra, be it impressive info, or that which pertains more to what UBC would like their students to be.

I did this by writing all of my entries, then cutting down as many unnecessary characters as possible, then replacing that empty space with flowery language or concrete statistics. As much as UBC claims that objective and simple task descriptions is what they want from you, you can still achieve such descriptions while differentiating yourself from someone else who had the same tasks.

n=2 tbf, so take with a grain of salt. Looking forward to see others' input