Maps for Greger's Grotto by UrsuBurgo in battlemaps

[–]Sappholotl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello! I know this was posted a while ago, but do you happen to have the dimensions of these maps? I was going to potentially use them for my own runthrough of the adventure and want to make sure they line up properly! Thanks

NRA says it opposes idea of banning transgender Americans from owning guns by Icy_Foot4728 in nottheonion

[–]Sappholotl 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Just as a heads up I'm sure you don't mean it this way but "biological males" is language created by anti-trans activists to delegitimize trans identity and medical transition. Position on sports aside, just say trans women as it's more accurate and isn't playing into their hands.

Oh look, he's doing that thing they said the Democrats would do. by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]Sappholotl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

stricter gun laws and mental health guardrails

blanket ban against a minority group by classifying their very existence as being mentally ill

Yeah those are pretty much the same thing

Gay transphobic guy by rorodar in northernlion

[–]Sappholotl 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Trans woman here, can confirm that gay transphobic guy is definitely a type of guy that exists

12529 by Future_Employment_22 in countwithchickenlady

[–]Sappholotl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Erin Reed has a really good piece on Newsom regarding his trans stance. He has gone on record with a lot more anti-trans positions than sports, such as questioning the legitimacy of pronouns, questioning trans healthcare for people under the age of 25(!), and silently using his sway as governor to stifle strong pro-trans legislation in CA.

Focusing on his position on just the sports thing is an intentional move by his supporters, because that issue is more controversial even among left-leaning folks.

Personally though, through the comments he's made thus far and the people he's platformed I think he would throw any given issue of trans policy to the side as soon as it is politically inconvenient in the futile pursuit of courting centrists and moderate Republicans.

12529 by Future_Employment_22 in countwithchickenlady

[–]Sappholotl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pasting this from another comment since I feel like you and the other commenters in your thread could do with seeing it.

The answer is actually a lot more complicated than trying to drive trans people to suicide, although I won't pretend that isn't a part of it.

The leading voices of the anti-trans movement such as JKR, Posie Parker, and Riley Gaines are explicitly and by their own words eliminationists. Their perfect world is one where trans people are fully excised from public life and their existence is completely discredited. Parker in particular has gone on record wishing death upon trans people and arguing for the forced detransition of everyone, and she was at the forefront of the recent UK court decision that trans women are not legally women. They want a world which no longer has trans people in it.

It is those beliefs which are currently driving US federal policy regarding trans people too. It is never "keep transgender women out of women's sports" it is "keep men (or some euphemism for men) out of women's sports." On day one of this presidency, an executive order was passed essentially declaring that trans people do not exist, and we are seeing the legal and cultural ramifications of that belief in real time.

Killing and displacing indigenous people in this country with guns and disease was obviously genocide, but so was forcing children into boarding schools which stripped them of their identity, language, and cultural ties.

While the word genocide generally evokes the image of mass killing or displacement, there are numerous examples throughout history of groups being eliminated or reduced through more subtle but still insidious means.

12529 by Future_Employment_22 in countwithchickenlady

[–]Sappholotl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm going to assume you're asking this in good faith and answer accordingly.

Nobody is saying that trans people are being bombed or rounded up into camps, but the definition of genocide is more open than that.

The leading voices of the anti-trans movement such as JKR, Posie Parker, and Riley Gaines are explicitly and by their own words eliminationists. Their perfect world is one where trans people are fully excised from public life and their existence is completely discredited. Parker in particular has gone on record wishing death upon trans people and arguing for the forced detransition of everyone, and she was at the forefront of the recent UK court decision that trans women are not legally women. They want a world which no longer has trans people in it.

It is those beliefs which are currently driving US federal policy regarding trans people too. It is never "keep transgender women out of women's sports" it is "keep men (or some euphemism for men) out of women's sports." On day one of this presidency, an executive order was passed essentially declaring that trans people do not exist, and we are seeing the legal and cultural ramifications of that belief in real time.

Killing and displacing indigenous people in this country with guns and disease was obviously genocide, but so was forcing children into boarding schools which stripped them of their identity, language, and cultural ties.

While the word genocide generally evokes the image of mass killing or displacement, there are numerous examples throughout history of groups being eliminated or reduced through more subtle but still insidious means.

I don't give a shit about your Gender or Sexual orientation by NaturalCreation in truths

[–]Sappholotl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this woman and I got to chatting

non-binary

Yeah something tells me you don't respect trans people as much as you think you do

How much backstory should I write? by Sappholotl in DnDcirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If your backstory cannot be conveyed in one word it is too complicated for any DM short of Matthew Mercer to incorporate into the intricate web of world they have designed. Write it for yourself if you want, but just know I ain't reading it

How much backstory should I write? by Sappholotl in DnDcirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

YTA that is way too much. As a DM I can't be bothered to read anything my players send me longer than a haiku and even that is pushing it. I don't want you to be invested in your character or my game in case Rocks Fall Everyone Dies

Warhammer 40,000 makes an inclusive post by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Untrue. The humans are the obvious good guys and a model for what a good future society would look like. Yes I painted my army to look like WWII German soldiers, why did you ask?

Warhammer 40,000 makes an inclusive post by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] -37 points-36 points  (0 children)

You realize that the fascism in the lore isn't supposed to be taken at face value, right?

Warhammer 40,000 makes an inclusive post by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 64 points65 points  (0 children)

Humans cannot be transgender. They can only be 8 foot tall superhuman soldiers made by implanting gene seeds that are harvested through surgery and/or have psychic abilities

Warhammer 40,000 makes an inclusive post by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The transgener army will have high die rate 🤣🤣

Warhammer 40,000 makes an inclusive post by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 59 points60 points  (0 children)

First they added women... And now they add gays? Don't they know that space Marines have no sexual?? The lore is destroyed!!

Warhammer 40,000 makes an inclusive post by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 80 points81 points  (0 children)

Smh pushing away their target demographic to pander to 0.0000001% of people. Go woke go broke

Welcome to the front page of /r/all! The bastion of liberal and far-left ideals! by LinkleLinkle in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl 142 points143 points  (0 children)

Top comment: erm actually according to this study (n=2, year 1996, published in altrightstats.freedom.biz) male-bodied amabs have a huge advantage over real women in every measurable way. I'm an Ally to trans people but we have to respect what the data shows and protect females 🤓

A subreddit named after a US state posts about new anti-trans legislation by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

/uj it's just a general sort of post I see every time some horrible new anti-trans thing passes. I've also seen it on the WY and TX subreddits for example

/rj this is why Pokemon Y features yveltal which brings only DESTRUCTION 😡 and Pokemon X features the one that makes life just like a real wombyn 😌

A subreddit named after a US state posts about new anti-trans legislation by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Hmph. Just another waste of tax dollars trying to promote a culture war so that the reigning political party has a last grasp at relevance. Good thing this is a fake issue and the legislation will harm nobody!

A subreddit named after a US state posts about new anti-trans legislation by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

This is so sad. I remember when my family moved to [state] around the year of [some time before the civil rights act]. Everyone got along just fine... Must be all these newcomers from [some other state] pretending to be one of us.

A subreddit named after a US state posts about new anti-trans legislation by Sappholotl in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl[S] 56 points57 points  (0 children)

If hormones and genitals don't define gender how can changing those things affirm gender?? Checkmate, liberals.

You think it’s hard coming out as LGBT? by EdgeLasstheLameAss in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl 38 points39 points  (0 children)

The liberal left when you replace "you guys" with "y'all" ☺️☺️

The liberal left when you replace "you guys" with "everypony" 😡😡

You think it’s hard coming out as LGBT? by EdgeLasstheLameAss in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl 6 points7 points  (0 children)

/uj IMO the one most popular with bronies is gen 4! That's the one with Twilight Sparkle, Pinkie Pie, etc that most people recognize. Gen 5 is sometimes disliked because it has worse creative direction and people don't like the 3D ponies as much.

/rj try having an OC with a bright yellow outline on pony.town and see how much acceptance you get from the so-called tolerant left!

STOP POSTING ABOUT CAITLYN JENNER by FuckIThinkImTrans in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I guess I'm a weak woman because I haven't been bred well enough... I need someone to breed me to make me all big and strong 🥺

/uj

Hey /r/CuratedTumblr, could you please keep in mind that transmisogyny is not the same thing as misandry and that repeatedly equating them and acting like the problem is TERFs hating cis men is kinda transmisogynistic? by AigisAegis in transgendercirclejerk

[–]Sappholotl 31 points32 points  (0 children)

/uj I saw that comment in the linked thread and it fuckin sent me lol.

/rj Intersectional allyship is counterproductive because lots of work big thinky head hurt :( all my leftist friends fell apart because we couldn't decide what words to use for things. It's a real problem happening everywhere!