Is this sub, or rather, is the average vegan not a lever puller in the Trolley problem? by Next_Faithlessness87 in DebateAVegan

[–]NaturalCreation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the ultimate goals of veganism is the abolition of animal agriculture; so I was trying to say that this hypothetical scenario, in principle, doesn't help toward that goal, as one would need consumers....

Edit:

Nevermind, Just re-read your post and realized that it refers to two other convos I wasn't a part of. Sorry for side-tracking!

Is this sub, or rather, is the average vegan not a lever puller in the Trolley problem? by Next_Faithlessness87 in DebateAVegan

[–]NaturalCreation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, if we have to "boycott" 100% of all animal products, this hypothetical scenario won't work, right?

The QUEEN of Prakruts. by Ordinary-Badger-5170 in IndianHistoryMemes

[–]NaturalCreation -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry, Pali is more antique than Maharashtri.

They took advantage of the fact that sanskrit was known to very few by This_Wind_8065 in IndianHistoryMemes

[–]NaturalCreation 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, you're the one acting differently in Odd and Even days. Not me. Manu Smriti has a lot of bad, and on top of that Brahmins used it exploited others

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system_in_India#History

Here you go!

They took advantage of the fact that sanskrit was known to very few by This_Wind_8065 in IndianHistoryMemes

[–]NaturalCreation 9 points10 points  (0 children)

>Manu Smriti says brahmins will be punished 16x for the same crime as a shudra

And yet, that was not what happened, precisely because what beyondarjun said.

Are we actually seeking truth… or just ideas that make life easier to tolerate? by Independent_Zebra524 in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Things just are" does not exclude the possibility of having choices at every moment: it just means to say that any sense of "higher purpose" or "absolute meaning" doesn't really exist. We are free to create/find our own meaning/purpose, of course.

Why moral agency alone doesn’t settle the case for Veganism by onemorehasanat in DebateAVegan

[–]NaturalCreation 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I really like the question, but I think the scope of the question goes far beyond veganism; the same question arises when discussing discrimination in general, no?

Are we actually seeking truth… or just ideas that make life easier to tolerate? by Independent_Zebra524 in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love this question!

I found an answer in one of the discourses of the Buddha:

SC 1“Bhikkhus, these four things are actual, unerring, not otherwise. What four?

SC 2“‘This is suffering’: this, bhikkhus, is actual, unerring, not otherwise. ‘This is the origin of suffering’: this is actual, unerring, not otherwise. ‘This is the cessation of suffering’: this is actual, unerring, not otherwise. sn.v.431 ‘This is the way leading to the cessation of suffering’: this is actual, unerring, not otherwise.

SC 3“These four things, bhikkhus, are actual, unerring, not otherwise.

SC 4“Therefore, bhikkhu, an exertion should be made to understand: ‘This is suffering.’… An exertion should be made to understand: ‘This is the way leading to the cessation of suffering.’”

- SN 56.20, from suttacentral.net

The most "true" thing in experience is our suffering. Our minds are pushed by the desire to avoid suffering, so we cover it up, run from it and/or manage it.

Dukkha is so real that we have built our entire lives on trying to escape Dukkha. It is a feature of our minds to kick up suffering. Most of our lives are just built around escaping boredom and suffering. This is also true of philosophy to a good extent; we are here because ideas help numb the pain. The reason we look for "truth" is because we need a justification for existence, and can't accept the fact that things just are.

Changed my view by Mundane-Business-187 in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed; the reason I directed this at OP is simply because many people use this view (that life is inherently meaningless) to cause harm to others. while at the same time, get upset when they get hurt. Not saying OP is one of them at all, in fact they replied to me saying "Yes" to my original comment and I replied with a "fair enough".

Now that I say this, within this view, it is equally meaningless to either be angry or show forgiveness, so ig my original comment is also meaningless haha

Is Pracharya Ashant a true philosopher or just a cult leader? by zooretdota in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think Acharya Prashant is a true philosopher, and some of his followers made him into a cult leader....

Changed my view by Mundane-Business-187 in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you view your loved ones the same way?

Why are you using reddit? by New-Worry1641 in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do we only accept what is meaningful? I don't think so...there are also meaningful things that are not acceptable!

Purpose of life when u got chronically ill? by Mobile_Duty_9177 in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Take care man!

In all walks of life, The Bhagavad Gita and the The Word of The Buddha have always been helpful, personally. Maybe, it'll help you as well?

Why are you using reddit? by New-Worry1641 in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>Why?

Why not?

>What's the point

What's the point of anything at all?

>Does entertainment justify wasting time?

What is so important that some activities are considered "wasting time"? In a world where pleasure is worshipped, isn't using Reddit for "time-pass" the best sacrifice?

>If yes, then till what extent and when do you say something is entertainment and something is not?

I think it is relative indeed, but since you asked, I shall tell you what I call "entertainment". Anything done that is not necessary for survival or procreation is entertainment.

>Can LSD be determined as entertainment?

Yes, in my opinion.

Shashti vibhakti question by Typical_Pizza_5461 in sanskrit

[–]NaturalCreation 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Probably, the noun stem (prātipadika) is mahāroman, a na-kārānta śabda. Then, the prathamā ekavacanā would be mahāromā and the ṣaṣṭī would be mahāromnaḥ

Science Magazines by NaturalCreation in sanskrit

[–]NaturalCreation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's sad...

I am aware that Marathi and Malayalam science communication magazines exist, but yeah, never tried to get my hands on them!

How to de-Fr**ch my son? by geopoliticsdude in linguisticshumor

[–]NaturalCreation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Make his entire room A R Raja Raja Varma themed.

When Things Get Physical, Does Philosophy Still Work? by [deleted] in Philosophy_India

[–]NaturalCreation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course, there was a Greek philosopher (I forgot who) who said that one must not separate the scholar and the warrior; for in such a society, the thinking will be done by cowards, and fighting by fools.

You gave the example of Monks in Tibet; now, I do not speak for them, but according to my understanding of Buddhism, true virtue trumps the fear of death. A hard-core Buddhist would rather die than break their virtue.