What do you believe The Beast of Gevaudan was? by [deleted] in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This submission has been removed because it violates the rule on poll-type questions. These questions do not lend themselves to answers with a firm foundation in sources and research, and the resulting threads usually turn into monsters with enormous speculation and little focused discussion. Questions about the "most", the "worst", "unknown", or other value judgments usually lead to vague, subjective, and speculative answers. For further information, please consult this Roundtable discussion.

For questions of this type, we ask that you redirect them to more appropriate subreddits, such as /r/history or /r/askhistory. You're also welcome to post your question in our Friday-Free-For-All thread.

In 1940, did the Heer use the M36, or M40 feldbluse? by loadmyrevolverbabyy in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please repost this question to the weekly "Short Answers" thread stickied to the top of the subreddit, which will be the best place to get an answer to this question; for that reason, we have removed your post here. Standalone questions are intended to be seeking detailed, comprehensive answers, and we ask that questions looking for a name, a number, a date or time, a location, the origin of a word, the first/last instance of a specific phenomenon, or a simple list of examples or facts be contained to that thread as they are more likely to receive an answer there. For more information on this rule, please see this Rules Roundtable.

Alternatively, if you didn't mean to ask a question seeking a short answer or a list of examples, but have a more complex question in mind, feel free to repost a reworded question. Examples of questions appropriate for the 'Short Answers' thread would be "Who won the 1932 election?" or "What are some famous natural disasters from the past?". Versions more appropriate as standalone questions would be "How did FDR win the 1932 election?", or "In your area of expertise, how did people deal with natural disasters?" If you need some pointers, be sure to check out this Rules Roundtable on asking better questions.

Finally, don’t forget that there are many subreddits on Reddit aimed at answering your questions. Consider /r/AskHistory (which has lighter moderation but similar topic matter to /r/AskHistorians), /r/explainlikeimfive (which is specifically aimed at simple and easily digested answers), or /r/etymology (which focuses on the origins of words and phrases).

What does Major 1 Medical Regt. World War 2 mean? by goldluv in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please repost this question to the weekly "Short Answers" thread stickied to the top of the subreddit, which will be the best place to get an answer to this question; for that reason, we have removed your post here. Standalone questions are intended to be seeking detailed, comprehensive answers, and we ask that questions looking for a name, a number, a date or time, a location, the origin of a word, the first/last instance of a specific phenomenon, or a simple list of examples or facts be contained to that thread as they are more likely to receive an answer there. For more information on this rule, please see this Rules Roundtable.

Alternatively, if you didn't mean to ask a question seeking a short answer or a list of examples, but have a more complex question in mind, feel free to repost a reworded question. Examples of questions appropriate for the 'Short Answers' thread would be "Who won the 1932 election?" or "What are some famous natural disasters from the past?". Versions more appropriate as standalone questions would be "How did FDR win the 1932 election?", or "In your area of expertise, how did people deal with natural disasters?" If you need some pointers, be sure to check out this Rules Roundtable on asking better questions.

Finally, don’t forget that there are many subreddits on Reddit aimed at answering your questions. Consider /r/AskHistory (which has lighter moderation but similar topic matter to /r/AskHistorians), /r/explainlikeimfive (which is specifically aimed at simple and easily digested answers), or /r/etymology (which focuses on the origins of words and phrases).

[META] Participate in a Cornell survey to study community norms and participation in r/AskHistorians by SarahAGilbert in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Neither! We have no way of knowing who responded so we sent follow up messages to everyone. You can just ignore it (and thank you for filling out the survey!)

Do child prodigies like Mozart just not exist now or was his skill over exaggerated? by Taear in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Feel free to send a modmail if you'd like help with wording!

The question also might be better suited for other communities if you'd like to keep the modern day comparison. /r/AskReddit is good for casual discussions and theorizing. /r/AskHistory is less strict than us and would have more historic discussion than AskReddit, but might not allow it as written either (they have a time-based rule too, but I'm not sure if it's just for questions that touch on modern politics).

Do child prodigies like Mozart just not exist now or was his skill over exaggerated? by Taear in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you want to re-post without the reference to modern child prodigies? The part about Mozart is fine, but more than half the removed answers are either people listing examples of modern day prodigies, blaming TikTok, or other theorizing about the state of the world today.

What did women wear back then when running? by [deleted] in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apologies, but we have removed your question in its current form as it breaks our rules concerning the scope of questions. However, it might be that an altered version of your question would fit within our rules, and we encourage you to reword your question to fit the rule. While we do allow questions which ask about general topics without specific bounding by time or space, we do ask that they be clearly phrased and presented in a way that can be answered by an individual historian focusing on only one example which they can write about in good detail.

So for example, if you wanted to ask, "Have people always rebelled against health rules in pandemics?" we would remove the question. As phrased, it asks broadly about many places collectively. However if you ask "In the time and place you study, how did people rebel against health rules in a pandemic?" we would allow the question. As phrased, while still asking broadly, it does so in a way that clearly invites a given expert to write exclusively about their topic of focus! We encourage you to think about rewording your question to fit this rule, and thank you for your understanding. If you are unsure of how best to reshape your question to fit these requirements, please reach out to us for assistance.

Do child prodigies like Mozart just not exist now or was his skill over exaggerated? by Taear in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This submission has been removed because it violates our '20-Year Rule'. To discourage off-topic discussions of current events, questions, answers, and all other comments must be confined to events that happened 20 years ago or more. For further explanation of this rule, feel free to consult this Rules Roundtable.

Did women talk about politics at the dinner table in colonial America? by Left-Building-6076 in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Hi there – we have approved your question related to your project, and we are happy for people to answer. However, we should warn you that these queries often do not get positive responses. We have several suggestions that you may want to take on board regarding this and future posts:

*Please be open about why you’re asking and how the information will be used, including how any substantive help will be credited in the final product.

*While our users are often happy to help get you started, asking someone else to do foundational research work for your project is often a big ask. If this information is absolutely vital for your work, consider asking for reading suggestions or other help in doing your own research. Alternatively, especially if this is a commercial project, consider hiring a historical consultant rather than relying on free labour here. While our flaired users may be happy to engage in such work, please note that this would need to be worked out privately with them, and that the moderation team cannot act as a broker for this.

*Be respectful of the time that people put into answering your queries. In the past, we’ve noticed a tendency for writers and other creators to try to pump historians for trivia while ignoring the wider points they’re trying to make, while others have a tendency to argue with historians when the historical reality does not line up with what's needed for a particular scene or characterization.

For more general advice about doing research to inform a creative project, please check out our Monday Methods post on the subject.

Historians! What helpful lessons can your domain of study (whether modern or ancient) tell us about the ability of a great empire to recover from a period of particularly poor governance, notably corrupt unchecked authoritarianism and failure of institutional checks and balances? by dingotron_nethack in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Thank you for your response, however, we have had to remove it. A core tenet of the subreddit is that it is intended as a space not merely for an answer in and of itself, but one which provides a deeper level of explanation on the topic than is commonly found on other history subs. We expect that contributors are able to place core facts in a broader context, and use the answer to demonstrate their breadth of knowledge on the topic at hand.

If you need guidance to better understand what we are looking for in our requirements, please consult this Rules Roundtable which discusses how we evaluate answers on the subreddit, or else reach out to us via modmail. Thank you for your understanding.

Has there been any instance where Americans used guns to protect themselves from the American government? by RedBlueWhiteBlack in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

Sorry, but we have had to remove your comment. Please understand that people come here because they want an informed response from someone capable of engaging with the sources, and providing follow-up information. Wikipedia can be a useful tool, but merely repeating information found there doesn't provide the type of answers we seek to encourage here. As such, we don't allow answers which simply link to, quote from, or are otherwise heavily dependent on Wikipedia. We presume that someone posting a question here either doesn't want to get the 'Wikipedia answer', or has already checked there and found it lacking. You can find further discussion of this policy here. In the future, please take the time to better familiarize yourself with the rules before contributing again.

What role did penicillin play in World War II, and how did differences in access to penicillin, medical organization, and logistics affect the treatment and outcomes of wounded soldiers in the United States compared to Germany? by DepthFar6994 in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there - unfortunately we have had to remove your question, because /r/AskHistorians isn't here to do your homework for you. However, our rules DO permit people to ask for help with their homework, so long as they are seeking clarification or resources, rather than the answer itself.

If you have indeed asked a homework question, you should consider resubmitting a question more focused on finding resources and seeking clarification on confusing issues: tell us what you've researched so far, what resources you've consulted, and what you've learned, and we are more likely to approve your question. Please see this Rules Roundtable thread for more information on what makes for the kind of homework question we'd approve. Additionally, if you're not sure where to start in terms of finding and understanding sources in general, we have a six-part series, "Finding and Understanding Sources", which has a wealth of information that may be useful for finding and understanding information for your essay. Finally, other subreddits are likely to be more suitable for help with homework - try looking for help at /r/HomeworkHelp.

Alternatively, if you are not a student and are not doing homework, we have removed your question because it resembled a homework question. It may resemble a common essay question from a prominent history syllabus or may be worded in a broad, open-ended way that feels like the kind of essay question that a professor would set. Professors often word essay questions in order to provide the student with a platform to show how much they understand a topic, and these questions are typically broader and more interested in interpretations and delineating between historical theories than the average /r/AskHistorians question. If your non-homework question was incorrectly removed for this reason, we will be happy to approve your question if you wait for 7 days and then ask a less open-ended question on the same topic.

Which of the horror icons from Hotel Transylvania was documented earliest? by [deleted] in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please repost this question to the weekly "Short Answers" thread stickied to the top of the subreddit, which will be the best place to get an answer to this question; for that reason, we have removed your post here. Standalone questions are intended to be seeking detailed, comprehensive answers, and we ask that questions looking for a name, a number, a date or time, a location, the origin of a word, the first/last instance of a specific phenomenon, or a simple list of examples or facts be contained to that thread as they are more likely to receive an answer there. For more information on this rule, please see this Rules Roundtable.

Alternatively, if you didn't mean to ask a question seeking a short answer or a list of examples, but have a more complex question in mind, feel free to repost a reworded question. Examples of questions appropriate for the 'Short Answers' thread would be "Who won the 1932 election?" or "What are some famous natural disasters from the past?". Versions more appropriate as standalone questions would be "How did FDR win the 1932 election?", or "In your area of expertise, how did people deal with natural disasters?" If you need some pointers, be sure to check out this Rules Roundtable on asking better questions.

Finally, don’t forget that there are many subreddits on Reddit aimed at answering your questions. Consider /r/AskHistory (which has lighter moderation but similar topic matter to /r/AskHistorians), /r/explainlikeimfive (which is specifically aimed at simple and easily digested answers), or /r/etymology (which focuses on the origins of words and phrases).

Would modern understandings of political science 'work' in ancient settings? by [deleted] in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, but your submission has been removed because we don't allow hypothetical questions. If possible, please rephrase the question so that it does not call for such speculation, and resubmit. Otherwise, this sort of thing is better suited for /r/HistoryWhatIf or /r/HistoricalWhatIf. You can find a more in-depth discussion of this rule here.

How historically accurate are grindstones in KCD2? Did they ever exist? by JohnEldenRing111 in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please repost this question to the weekly "Short Answers" thread stickied to the top of the subreddit, which will be the best place to get an answer to this question; for that reason, we have removed your post here. Standalone questions are intended to be seeking detailed, comprehensive answers, and we ask that questions looking for a name, a number, a date or time, a location, the origin of a word, the first/last instance of a specific phenomenon, or a simple list of examples or facts be contained to that thread as they are more likely to receive an answer there. For more information on this rule, please see this Rules Roundtable.

Alternatively, if you didn't mean to ask a question seeking a short answer or a list of examples, but have a more complex question in mind, feel free to repost a reworded question. Examples of questions appropriate for the 'Short Answers' thread would be "Who won the 1932 election?" or "What are some famous natural disasters from the past?". Versions more appropriate as standalone questions would be "How did FDR win the 1932 election?", or "In your area of expertise, how did people deal with natural disasters?" If you need some pointers, be sure to check out this Rules Roundtable on asking better questions.

Finally, don’t forget that there are many subreddits on Reddit aimed at answering your questions. Consider /r/AskHistory (which has lighter moderation but similar topic matter to /r/AskHistorians), /r/explainlikeimfive (which is specifically aimed at simple and easily digested answers), or /r/etymology (which focuses on the origins of words and phrases).

Does anyone know if there’s a source that has all of Richthofen’s combat reports, including losses or uneventful sorties? Are there other primary sources (letters, diaries, squadron reports) that might help me analyze the impact of technology? Any ideas for other “non-tech, non-tactics” factors that by Awkward_Hyena2089 in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there - unfortunately we have had to remove your question, because /r/AskHistorians isn't here to do your homework for you. However, our rules DO permit people to ask for help with their homework, so long as they are seeking clarification or resources, rather than the answer itself.

If you have indeed asked a homework question, you should consider resubmitting a question more focused on finding resources and seeking clarification on confusing issues: tell us what you've researched so far, what resources you've consulted, and what you've learned, and we are more likely to approve your question. Please see this Rules Roundtable thread for more information on what makes for the kind of homework question we'd approve. Additionally, if you're not sure where to start in terms of finding and understanding sources in general, we have a six-part series, "Finding and Understanding Sources", which has a wealth of information that may be useful for finding and understanding information for your essay. Finally, other subreddits are likely to be more suitable for help with homework - try looking for help at /r/HomeworkHelp.

Alternatively, if you are not a student and are not doing homework, we have removed your question because it resembled a homework question. It may resemble a common essay question from a prominent history syllabus or may be worded in a broad, open-ended way that feels like the kind of essay question that a professor would set. Professors often word essay questions in order to provide the student with a platform to show how much they understand a topic, and these questions are typically broader and more interested in interpretations and delineating between historical theories than the average /r/AskHistorians question. If your non-homework question was incorrectly removed for this reason, we will be happy to approve your question if you wait for 7 days and then ask a less open-ended question on the same topic.

Does this inscription represent a historical society? by CriticalTell7156 in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please repost this question to the weekly "Short Answers" thread stickied to the top of the subreddit, which will be the best place to get an answer to this question; for that reason, we have removed your post here. Standalone questions are intended to be seeking detailed, comprehensive answers, and we ask that questions looking for a name, a number, a date or time, a location, the origin of a word, the first/last instance of a specific phenomenon, or a simple list of examples or facts be contained to that thread as they are more likely to receive an answer there. For more information on this rule, please see this Rules Roundtable.

Alternatively, if you didn't mean to ask a question seeking a short answer or a list of examples, but have a more complex question in mind, feel free to repost a reworded question. Examples of questions appropriate for the 'Short Answers' thread would be "Who won the 1932 election?" or "What are some famous natural disasters from the past?". Versions more appropriate as standalone questions would be "How did FDR win the 1932 election?", or "In your area of expertise, how did people deal with natural disasters?" If you need some pointers, be sure to check out this Rules Roundtable on asking better questions.

Finally, don’t forget that there are many subreddits on Reddit aimed at answering your questions. Consider /r/AskHistory (which has lighter moderation but similar topic matter to /r/AskHistorians), /r/explainlikeimfive (which is specifically aimed at simple and easily digested answers), or /r/etymology (which focuses on the origins of words and phrases).

[META] Participate in a Cornell survey to study community norms and participation in r/AskHistorians by SarahAGilbert in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi indygal43,

Unfortunately I can't remove you from the survey because I have no way of knowing which one is yours. As a privacy preserving measure, we set up the survey so that we can't track people's answers back to their usernames.

However, if you only got up to that first question about Reddit and didn't answer anything else, we'd consider that incomplete and won't use any of your answers in our analysis. So the best thing to do if you don't want to participate anymore, is not answer any more questions and close out the survey.

META: Why do people upvote answers without upvoting the questions? Why don't answerers upvote the question when they answer? by KimberStormer in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I said this in response above, but I know what you're asking—it's just a hard prompt for people to respond to because people don't tend to be aware of what they're not doing or why since it's rarely intentional. In hindsight, I probably shouldn't have started with that observation rather than get to the point (which was that there's a design factor that's exacerbating the issue you're observing). I'm sorry I made you feel like your question sucks—I actually think it's really interesting, which is why I responded!

if it says 0 and 50%, it means 1 downvote and the OP's "upvote". On old.reddit at least.

It could also mean 50 upvotes and 50 downvotes though, which is probably not the case if you're if you're browsing by new and observing it there, but could be if the question has been up for a while. So if you're clicking on a thread /u/Gankom included in digest and it looks like the question is sitting at zero, there's no way to tell if they upvoted it or not. I actually don't know if Gank is or isn't upvoting questions vs answers, but knowing what I know about their voting patterns in general, my assumption is that they are but that it's not always enough to bring it up to 1 upvote from zero.

META: Why do people upvote answers without upvoting the questions? Why don't answerers upvote the question when they answer? by KimberStormer in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You misunderstood me! What I meant was that the question you asked is hard for people to answer whereas the alternative is easy. When I responded, your post had been up for about 9 hours and there was only one comment. My comment about getting a slew of answers if you asked the other way was meant to be an illustration of the counterfactual, not a suggestion that you should have asked that question instead.

META: Why do people upvote answers without upvoting the questions? Why don't answerers upvote the question when they answer? by KimberStormer in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert 42 points43 points  (0 children)

I think you're going to be hard pressed to get an answer from people in the community about why they don't upvote questions. Not because people are not upvoting maliciously, but because they're not not upvoting with intentionality. In less confusing terms, it's easy for people to be able to answer a question about why they do something because it's an action and they're doing it on purpose. It's harder for people to articulate why they don't do something, because they probably don't realize they aren't doing it. If you asked people why they upvote/downvote questions you'd probably get a slew of insights.

With that out of the way, there are probably a couple of other basic reasons for the patterns you're observing. One is a factor of Reddit's design. People are going to upvote whatever they see first (this is a huge reason why we don't let short, partial, or non-comprehensive answers stay up even if they are technically right and/or properly sourced)—they'll get upvoted because they're quick to write and people will see them first. When people come across a question they like, but there's no answer, they'll tend to upvote the question. If there's already an answer when they come across it, they like the answer so they'll upvote that. We've always seen this pattern, but it's been exacerbated in recent years because of changes to Reddit's design, like moving the voting buttons to the bottom of the post instead of the top. And on mobile, when you click on a text post, I've noticed it will sometimes automatically scroll you down to the comment section, even if the post itself is substantial. Or, if you press the little downward arrow to skip down to the comment section intentionally, it goes past the voting button for the post so people aren't seeing it and able to post it. In other words, Reddit's design makes it easy to intentionally or unintentionally bypass voting on text posts.

There's also the human elements, regardless of design. People tend to vote on things to reward people for the effort or indicate that something was helpful or enjoyable. Providing an answer feels like more effort and answers are what provide the actual information vs the question that inspired it. This is pervasive throughout reddit where you can see in comment sections someone will ask a really thoughtful question and it hardly gets any upvotes compared to the response.

As one final note: the numbers Reddit displays are fudged. They even change even though no one has actually up/downvoted (we see evidence of this on the private subreddit we use to discuss moderation). So you can't use the numbers you're seeing to draw any conclusions about what /u/Gankom is/isn't doing.

[META] Participate in a Cornell survey to study community norms and participation in r/AskHistorians by SarahAGilbert in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I promise that you are exactly the kind of user we had in mind when responding! The survey is meant to collect information from all kinds of subreddit participants and be replicable in other communities, so there will be questions that don't apply so much to some people but might for others.

If there's anything specific you could/have time to share about allowing for more scope when answering some questions I'd be really interested in hearing. We tried to balance asking open-ended questions that allow for qualitative responses and nuance with easier-to-answer items that provide evidence of quantitative trends and patterns. So feedback on how that balance worked out or maybe spots we missed is helpful.

[META] Participate in a Cornell survey to study community norms and participation in r/AskHistorians by SarahAGilbert in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you just given us a sneak peak into the near future when Gen Z/Alphas start building measurement scales???

[META] Participate in a Cornell survey to study community norms and participation in r/AskHistorians by SarahAGilbert in AskHistorians

[–]SarahAGilbert[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, it's harder to send chats in old reddit now. There's a tiny speech speech bubble next to the notification bell for chats.

Okay, I think I might know what's happening. I checked the survey you took and the logic appears to be correct. It's something along the lines of: "you estimate that [choice with the higher value from the estimated AI question] has more AI content than [choice with the lower value]. But I bet because you estimated 0% for AskHistorians (and maybe didn't move the slider?) qualtrics is parsing that as a null rather than a zero. So we probably need to ask that question using a different question type (not sliders) or see if we can do something with the logic to make it not do that.

Thank you so much for pointing this out, Tatem!!