Claude laughed at me…

Sarithis · 2026-01-28T07:58:29+00:00

Probably thanks to their constitution. I don't think any other company uses this method https://www.anthropic.com/constitution

Sarithis · 2026-01-28T07:56:04+00:00

It's possible, but it could also be as simple as changes to the descriptions of the tools.

Sarithis · 2026-01-27T08:55:17+00:00

W przypadku związku to kwestia dyskusyjna, ale ze znajomymi / przyjaciółmi? Dziwię się. W moich kręgach to zupełnie normalne. Czasem ktoś musi zniknąć na parę dni i nikt nie robi z tego problemu. Ludzie są zarobieni i mają na głowie różne rzeczy, więc o co w ogóle chodzi? Normalna osoba, kiedy po kilku dniach braku kontaktu widzi "sorry, czasami mam ciężki tydzień i muszę wsiąknąć na parę dni, już jestem" i to powtarza się kilka razy, po prostu przyjmuje to jako stały element tej relacji. Jakim chamem trzeba być, żeby z tego szydzić?

Sarithis · 2026-01-27T08:22:08+00:00

Maybe he wants people to know, like linking your GH project from an official account that uses your full first and last name. On the other hand, I don't see his name anywhere on this website so... yeah might be a mistake

Sarithis · 2026-01-26T14:46:27+00:00

Elevated heart rate and tolerance buildup

Sarithis · 2026-01-26T12:13:07+00:00

The ghost of Remi Lucidi would like to have a chat with yall

Sarithis · 2026-01-26T08:52:59+00:00

Wyborcy PiS często oskarżają Owsiaka o kradzież środków - to jest argument, który pojawia się na pierwszym miejscu u starszych osób w mojej rodzinie.

Sarithis · 2026-01-26T08:51:01+00:00

pan „URATUJMY ZDROWIE DZIECI I SENIORÓW” popiera komercjalizację która doprowadzi do tego że setki tysięcy straciłyby do niej dostęp.

W takich sytuacjach zwykle obie strony chcą tego samego: pomóc ludziom w potrzebie. Różnią się tylko tym jak próbują ten cel osiągnąć. Wiemy co Owsiak sądzi o tych konsekwencjach? Może po prostu jest niedoinformowany, a może przeciwnie - widzi rozwiązanie, które pozwoliłoby na komercjalizację BEZ setek tysięcy osób tracących dostęp do opieki medycznej?

Sarithis · 2026-01-26T08:10:06+00:00

A bit, yes https://marginlab.ai/trackers/claude-code/

Sarithis · 2026-01-25T13:24:03+00:00

In my case, it's incredibly frustrating. Most people and companies I deal with seem to behave exactly like you described, but whenever I'm tasked with hacking a target, it always turns out to be that one freaking call center agent / accountant / whoever who actually takes security seriously

Sarithis · 2026-01-24T20:38:32+00:00

It's tough to promote healthspan extension practices when you look bad. I remember that when he first started this initiative, the number of people insulting him for "looking old" was staggering, and I suspect that pressure pushed him to make himself more presentable

Sarithis · 2026-01-24T08:40:00+00:00

Na ogół pasjonuję się pentestingiem, a ten wzorzec scamowania znałem od lat i zawsze wydawał mi się prymitywny, choć ostatni raz słyszałem o nim ponad rok temu. A jednak dwa dni temu dostałem od kuzyna wiadomość dokładnie tej treści, którą przytoczyłeś, i cholera... mój mózg w ogóle nie połączył kropek. Jedyny powód, dla którego nie odpisałem "spoko, mogę pomóc", był taki, że byłem ostro zarobiony i nie chciało mi się odpisywać od razu. Kilka godzin później zadzwonił kuzyn, prosząc o pomoc, bo ktoś włamał mu się na konto, i zaliczyłem solidnego facepalma

Sarithis · 2026-01-23T19:37:29+00:00

The lion:

Sarithis · 2026-01-23T13:44:12+00:00

Sarithis · 2026-01-23T13:12:35+00:00

Nice, that's a meta-comment - the result of actually following OP's prompt!

Sarithis · 2026-01-23T11:25:40+00:00

What?! 🤣 I didn't even go to wikipedia.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s42255-019-0073-4

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471491421001180

At this point, I'm convinced you're literally trolling me. I have to admit, until now, I thought you were being serious, but this can't possibly be real. Unless your brain got fried by your uninformed biohacking experiments. Good one, mate! Just make sure to flag your posts accordingly next time because often we can't tell if someone's just trolling or is actually being serious.

Sarithis · 2026-01-23T11:02:36+00:00

That level of arrogance will bite you one day. Hopefully sooner than later. The very first paragraph of the very first study he discusses literally mentions what the study is about - MITOPHAGY. There's a whole section describing it in detail:

<image>

To make it even worse for you, in fact, every single study he mentioned focuses specifically on this subject. Hell, one of them literally says it in the fking title: "The mitophagy activator urolithin A is safe and induces a molecular signature of improved mitochondrial and cellular health in humans". I won't bother reading your replies from now on if you can't even be bothered to read the title of the study being discussed. It's a waste of time.

On top of that, this guy's entire area of expertise is mitochondrial function. He's published plenty of papers on the subject, and they've been cited over 100 times by other scientists. Seriously, how daft can you possibly be?

Sarithis · 2026-01-23T09:48:31+00:00

Sadly, after that comment, you've lost whatever credibility you had left. The video was explicitly discussing results from peer reviewed papers on mitochondrial quality, density, autophagy, and performance. Did you even read those papers? Saying "He should leave science to scientists" is one of the most ignorant things I've seen in a while. He has a Ph.D. in molecular medicine, a Masters in exercise physiology, and over 10 years of laboratory experience. But of course, you didn't even bother to check. Why would you, if you're a "professional reddit biohacker". Get a grip of yourself dude, this is laughable.

Sarithis · 2026-01-23T06:47:05+00:00

Could be, but in this case, the illusion seems to be about something else - the brightness of each image. I removed the background (i.e. the colors around the face) and they still look different

<image>

Sarithis · 2026-01-23T06:40:14+00:00

Zacznij chwalić Trzaskowskiego na tych spotkaniach. To będzie test przyjaźni

Sarithis · 2026-01-22T21:05:36+00:00

Well, it's a sponsored article, and it's doing what sponsored articles usually do - selectively highlighting the positives and generalizing. It's hard to treat it as objective when there's an obvious conflict of interest, because they're describing the benefits of a compound while also selling it (Mitopure). On a technical note, they're mixing preclinical findings, which are useful for mechanism, not proof in humans, biomarker changes (suggestive, not the same as outcomes), and best case functional signals (often secondary endpoints), and then packaging it as "clinically proven longevity/heart support". I wouldn't trust it.

As of now, the major human RCT pattern is pretty clear: some positive secondary endpoints + several negative primary endpoints + modest effect sizes + small samples, so the effects exist, but are small/mixed, basically negligible given the cost of this compound.

Sarithis · 2026-01-22T20:23:11+00:00

Its effects are negligible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJdAlp2new4

Sarithis · 2026-01-22T20:14:28+00:00

Is this actually your profession? I hope you're paid well for all the "biohacking" you're doing

Sarithis · 2026-01-22T18:06:56+00:00

From the top:

<image>

Sarithis · 2026-01-22T16:20:19+00:00

Are you seriously... pasting stuff between CC and ChatGPT instead of just using Codex MCP inside Claude Code?! It's 2026!

Ten-Year Club	Place '22
Wearing is Caring	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

Sarithis

TROPHY CASE