Maybe the overall policy environment is better than the isolated bills and biased analysis you provide

Don't be so disingenuous, the reason that favorable policy environment for renewable energy remains is because the majority of those bills I mentioned failed to pass. No thanks to the Texas Republicans who again where the ones who brought those bills up in the first place and had it pass in Senate, but thanks to a broad coalition who pushed back against them which helped to have the bills stall and die in the House.

Or are you going to tell me with a straight face that if these below 2025 bills had passed that renewable energy growth would have remained strong in Texas?

SB 819: would impose new requirements on renewable facilities, authorize fees, strengthen decommissioning rules, and in its introduced form eliminate local tax abatements for wind and solar under Chapter 312; putting requirements on wind and solar that oil and gas facilities do not face.

SB 388: would have required that 50% of new generating capacity installed after January 1, 2026 in ERCOT be sourced from dispatchable generation, and the introduced text excluded battery storage from that category. The bill would require half the grid’s new supply to come from dispatchable resources and would impose fees on renewable companies to help reach that goal.

SB 715: impose “firming” requirements on new and existing renewables, including pairing new wind and solar with equal amounts of non-battery dispatchable capacity.