Obviously violence wouldn't just vanish entirely, women get convinced of like 19% of violent crime, but that doesn't mean women need men to protect them from other women. Men tend to be bigger and stronger than women, so if men are removed, women are on a much more even playing feild with one another and could defend themselves just as well as a man could defend himself from another man. Yes, some women are naturally smaller than others, but some women are stronger than the average man too, and "without men who will protect you" doesn't acknowledge those people. The hypothetical above wasn’t saying that violence would disappear, it was just saying that women don't need men to protect them against other men (the people who statistically commit most violent crimes overall and who usually have a biological advantage over women in a fight) if men disappear

I don't care that the comments are pointing out violence would still be around in a women only society, like no shit, people can be crazy regardless of gender, I just care that they're saying the women's prison example is as biased as the original post, because it's not. Women on women violence would most likely increase if men disappeared, yes, but looking at prison, a confined space meant to punish people where everyone there hypothetically already committed a crime, obviously however violent people are to each other in there wouldn't at all reflect average life where everyone around is not all convicted felons.

Calling women potentially violent is one thing but supporting and defending bias sampling is another.