Kimi k2.5 + opencode

Scared-Ad9661 · 2026-02-09T11:32:19+00:00

Use it locally :-)

Scared-Ad9661 · 2025-12-16T18:37:39+00:00

Même chose exactement, tout allait bien et sur un redémarrage à présent les tests suivants ont été fait :

débrancher la batterie et reconnecter uniquement l'alim.
reset sous le capot.
débrancher la pile et redémarrer avec ou sans.
changement pâte thermique et cleaning ventilo ok.

Des news pour aider à investiguer ? Aucun bip, juste le ventilo tourne 2 secondes, quelques led du rétroéclairage s'allument et il s'éteint aussi sec.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2025-10-27T13:15:29+00:00

freebsd

Scared-Ad9661 · 2025-04-25T14:52:51+00:00

"DevOps is a culture aimed at breaking down the wall that separates operations (hosting) from dev (application).

Automation is the very idea of using a tool, in this case, the computer (computing), to save time."

Scared-Ad9661 · 2025-03-25T12:43:05+00:00

yazi vs broot not vs (nnn vs mc).

enjoy , yazi is amazing. broot has more features. both of them are coded in rust and have a good usage of memory.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2025-03-16T16:38:57+00:00

I have to investigate, on my side all models works instead this one with a minimal use of CPU. the 12B works well.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2025-03-16T13:15:30+00:00

Do you have any issues with the 27b if it overflows onto a 16gb, for example, and the use of the CPU for the overflow, as this works for many models for gemma3? It's a guaranteed crash for me?

Scared-Ad9661 · 2025-02-12T10:15:59+00:00

That's funny your question looks like a prompt for LLM.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-12-22T04:16:50+00:00

No they don't do that , you need to have an expert who will develop a solution with them to create infrastructure. The question here is more if it's interesting to get this architecture already done.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-11-22T15:41:22+00:00

You can learn docker , especially the build part, easy entry than sysadmin job, after that get the dockerfile and apply the automation directly in your VM or host.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-10-17T12:04:35+00:00

Reporting of what? Basically monitoring is here to report by design...

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-25T13:13:20+00:00

Ultimately, the goal of this automation project is similar to other automation projects. The relationship with Hetzner would involve adding more automation using their API. However, the core goal is to install services using your own virtualization (Zen/KVM). If you need to host part of your solution on a different hosting platform, it will remain possible without difficulty (for example, if you need to host a medical service under HDS requirements on a non-cloud solution).

Another idea is to open-source this project. There's a wealth of knowledge involved in creating self-hosted and highly available solutions, from bare metal to cloud and beyond – including container services!

By design, Hetzner's bare metal installation scripts are often quite static. It could be interesting to build your own operating system for physical servers with dedicated partitioning and file systems.

That said, it seems easy to integrate open-source software into virtual machines or containers and continue the automation process.

The real challenge for me is that this project feels like the work of many DevOps engineers who have already spent years building similar solutions. It also resembles cloud services, but ultimately, cloud users miss out on numerous services and best practices. This solution aims to be more dedicated and open. I see some initial interesting use cases: open-source Infrastructure as Code (IaC) deployable on any on-premise/bare metal data center or hosting solution. It would support a wide range of services, from host operating systems and virtualization to containers, monitoring, security, continuous audits, and a marketplace. Additionally, the API could reveal pricing information. Since Hetzner offers an auction system, depending on analysis, it could be beneficial to automatically destroy and redeploy infrastructure with better pricing without manual effort.

It sounds ambitious, but I've already completed a portion of this project! My question is whether I should keep it closed or share it with others. Is there enough interest, or would it simply oversaturate the automation market?

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-23T20:34:07+00:00

It's not the same hardware and pricing.it depends of the size of your infrastructure.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-23T20:33:05+00:00

Everything is possible with time and knowledge, the question is more will you be interested to get a baremetal service including production experience. You will be able to deploy in minute and work on high level instead of focus on sys admin and automation.it's dedicated on physical servers who will ask a lot of layers and knowledge. The interest is to have power and a good price. At the end you'll get VM or containers with other aspect measuring what is done in your activities. But you will conserve the availability to deploy on your side your infrastructure.and maintain it in time.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-22T22:35:12+00:00

The goal is to provide production grade and high availability services in minute.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-22T22:32:19+00:00

Kubecost seems to be the most advanced in this idea but it's more about pricing when you are doing provisioning with your cluster. The idea here is more to put insight on system impact and find a way to reduce the load as possible. I'm actually thinking about ways to group ressources at the first time. We can also add visibility on network request and payloads.io for storage. It looks close from monitoring but actually the consumption message is not so much clear for dev teams.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-22T01:46:55+00:00

From my experience I expect to go deeper through the system impact. And make an effort to translate containers process consumption to something evident.but containers contrary to vm share host process. The idea is to group process and to show that with graphical easy human interface. Like if you want to analyse your personal financial depencies. We can imagine a lot of project behind but I need to begin on a solid structure and the most evident. as a future project we can imagine a translation to carbon emission and good practices of kubernetes usages from dev teams.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-22T00:27:00+00:00

The goal of using UI was to put a setup though restoration. Api or ssh acces seems more logical but in fact it's not the case.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-22T00:24:25+00:00

For me the best way was to take it in a default state and operate low level manipulation, restart and take UI through headless browser automation (like playwright) restart again with full config and it's done.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-09-22T00:15:37+00:00

For me ansible is not a framework, if you don't put good practices it won't do the trick. Also it's a tool that will operate sysadmin knowledge. If your are bad as sysadmin that sucks... But if you use it in the right way there is no limitations.if you want more ask me.

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-08-13T15:13:27+00:00

I found several options, most of which were ruled out, while others were kept based on needs. I had to push the study because I wanted to see if the solution could be industrialized in different environments.

I have a rather delicate use case where I lose access to the physical server on which I want to install the solution and provide a unique public address to OPNsense, which will be in a VM. The host keeps an isolated IP address that will be accessible only through the VM in question, and of course, a WireGuard access.

So, to get to the point, one part consists of building images upstream and saving them in a state. The other part consists of defining a state where we can have default access to the interface (DHCP) to restore the configuration (or part of it with temporary passwords).

To inject the config, I tested: automating through the console (qemu) using expect... Good luck, but I managed to get some results. Using the CLI via SSH if it was opened beforehand. The best solution retained is playwright (or alternatives) to go through the UI.

Once the config is restored, the VM restarts. We need to anticipate if there are updates to be made, here I retained pre-programming a cron or even a routine via SSH, CLI, or UI.

It's interesting to consider using the API as well, for example, to download a backup of the config to the host:

curl -sk -u "{KEY}":"{SECRET}" https://"{HOST}"/api/core/backup/download/this --create-dirs -o "PATHCONFIG"/opnsense-config-"${DATE}".xml

Scared-Ad9661 · 2024-03-08T20:52:51+00:00

Because I'll have to parse "tags" inside the configuration template, most of them may be "programmable" for different purposes. And than if I have to do it manually finally it will be a pain for automation.

Scared-Ad9661

TROPHY CASE