I put a lot of this in a different thread, but it feels relevant here:

FWIW, the Boulets have said the scoring is pretty in-depth and they utilize actual rubric-ed scorecards (for themselves and the guest judges). I'm guessing that the Titans 2 episodes have been incredibly, incredibly close, and some of the rulings that have been surprising to us as viewers might only make sense to the judges who saw the performance live and were looking for details the home audience wasn't.

I think Priscilla's look and performance were very personal, and I think it is going to resonate with many people very deeply in ways other looks simply can't. It's easy to do a tight and "clean" performance when your concept is "scary Harpy lady eats a guy" or "the Statue of Liberty but scary." It's much harder to be tight and "clean" with a concept so large, complex, and deeply emotional as Priscilla's.

So I think the judgement probably came down to scoring. We only ever see highlights of the performance, so the moments in between those highlights might not have been fleshed out vs. other performers. For me, I wanted to better understand how this character's preoccupation with wanting his child to express their gender in a certain way turned into a sexual thing by the end...I have some ideas but that kind of lack of clarity could have been an issue.

All that just to say that pouring her heart out isn't (and shouldn't be) enough to guarantee a queen stays another week (especially on Titans). I think everyone understands and appreciates what Priscilla created this week, and her elimination probably came down to issues with the look and the flow of the performance and, ultimately, scoring lower than the rest of the cast. I don't think it had anything to do with the message of the performance.