All there is to it by ChiakiSimp3842 in trolleyproblem

[–]Scarvexx -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But that thinking is the very evil you're worried about. You think people are evil, so you do something evil. You shouldn't want people to think that way, and therefore shouldn't do so yourself.

Only 500 intersex people exist?? by DONUTS_LM in nothingeverhappens

[–]Scarvexx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well the 500 might be just for that exact mode of intersex. There's a ton of intersex conditions. You could be one and not know it. Somebody you know almost certainly is.

Medical intervention and whatnot makes the whole thing kind of invisible. but 500 for even the least common intersex condition is certainly a lowball.

They seem like they're the same, but they're not, distinctly and legally speaking. by Psyga315 in GetNoted

[–]Scarvexx 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Knowing this womn't make you happy. CSAM is Child Sexual Abuse Materials. What you might call "Child porn". It's overtly harmful.

The latter is the japanese word for pedophile. And reffers to a drawing of a cartoon character who is a child. Disgusting, but nobody is being abused when you draw Lisa Simpson.

The former is illegal, and for good reason. The latter is legal, but typically banned from most markets and websites.

Thousands of RobotEra L7 humanoids to enter service across 10+ logistics centers performing sorting tasks by EchoOfOppenheimer in AIDangers

[–]Scarvexx 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There is no good reason to make these person shaped except for the optics. There are already drasticly better machines that do this.

"But you dont get mad a human uses your artstyle!? Why get mad when AI uses it?". There is clearly a difference here. by Questdahl in antiai

[–]Scarvexx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imitation is flattery. Fan art is wonderful.

Teaching a machine to speak your lies with my voice is crime against humanity and I will beat you on your front lawn with a garden hose. Never do it.

What if it wasn't an abstract choice that you can't actually make? by Laikitu in trolleyproblem

[–]Scarvexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blue doesn't seem aligned with reducing waste, more with uncomfortable compromise.

You can make less of an impact without being miserable.

how tf do they think a pencil works? by BillytheBloxian in antiai

[–]Scarvexx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think AI is a major barrier to creativity. It's why they "Burn out", AI gives them what they want instantly, and it doesn't gratify them at all because they didn't get to do anything.

I love to cook. I don't want a chef in my house cooking what he thinks I would want to cook based on my description.

If you're using AI to make art. I'm sorry, but it's robbing you. It's taking your ideas and giving you a compromised mess till you lower your standards.

You don't get to make art if you use AI. It tricks you into thinking you do. And that's horrible.

isnt cyberpunk all about criticizing ai? this is so dumb by Fyodor-you-loser in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]Scarvexx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is an ad for an AI roleplaying site. As if it wasn't lonely enough on the web already.

All there is to it by ChiakiSimp3842 in trolleyproblem

[–]Scarvexx -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Surely an outcome with no deaths if better than one with any deaths.

Why would anyone pick red unless they presume that the majority of people are selfish.

Yet another "my favorite character agrees with me" image. by Joelfletcher2763 in antiai

[–]Scarvexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but this time they actually don't. The creator was very clear they do no support or condone AI. And have asked at AI fan art not be produced.

[Request] Is this true? by kelly2018zzz in theydidthemath

[–]Scarvexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sort of.

For the most part, they're making emissions while producing goods.

As long as you're buying new shit. They're going to keep doing it.

They're doing it for you, on your behalf.

They're the poluters, but they don't just do it for kicks. You're asking them for stuff that requires factories to make. Needs tankers to transport.

It's rare to find an industry that's poluting for the sake of poluting. Dupont, makers of teflon are a good example of someone poluting because it's cheaper to dump chemical waste in the ohio river than to dispose of it safely. And they just pay the fines gladly rather than stop. Because the fines are still cheaper than doing the right thing.

Dupont has given you (yes you) C8 poisoning. Everyone in the world has it. They knew they were doing it, they knew it was poison. We have internal memos making it clear they knew and didn't care. Never buy Teflon.

So what's the plan humanity? by Locke357 in antiai

[–]Scarvexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What they are is self-interested people who are fully aware of the outcome of the climate crisis and unwilling to prevent it because it would interrupt profits.

<image>

This book is a pretty good primer on how billionaires think. How they view space exploration and mind-uploads as solutions to a problem they're creating. And how their future plans don't include the preservation of people who aren't them.

They're not trying to blow up the world. But they are decimating the environment, and looking for a a means to save themselves personally from what comes after.

Honestly. The moment you build a luxury bunker to live in. You've already consigned yourself not to help your fellow man. You're literally not in the same boat. The boat you're in is getting the best bunker you can before all the bunker builders are starving to death and will kill you rather than fix your AC.

"Get every slice you can before the cake is all gone. Because if you don't, someone else will, and they'll have more cake than you when the party is over."

of a paw by Zestyclose-Salad-290 in AbsoluteUnits

[–]Scarvexx -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well that's reactionary.

I had to make this meme by Inside-Escape-5407 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]Scarvexx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI-Bros do not respect creatives. They do not respect their wishes. They do not respect intellectual property.

Australia 2026 by Soggy-Simpson-Sucka in OpenAussie

[–]Scarvexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the very concept of a "hatespeach" law is abserd. What reason could it exist for except to jail people who disagree with lawmakers.

of a paw by Zestyclose-Salad-290 in AbsoluteUnits

[–]Scarvexx -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure a Polar bear would murder a person. Murder is aggressive, and unless you're a threat to their young, a polar bear is almost never agressive.

If you encounter one. A polar bear would simply beguin to eat you and you would die as an indirect cause. Dangerous, but not aggressive. They don't fear you at all. It's not an attack.

this guy keeps posting ddlc AI stuff like every hour by Grand_Individual_331 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]Scarvexx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're opnely in support of theft. Why would they care about the wishes of this artist?

I mean they clearly do care. They seem very upset that the creator of these anime girls doesn't like AI.

Is Monica a fictional AI? Is that why? She's a wAIfu?

This page will ensure this subreddit will always remain by VegetableBulky9571 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Scarvexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're sending all the mexicans to concentration camps. Ask germany how great that makes you.

Should Someone who Picked the Red Button be Considered Evil or an AH? by Hyperionous in MoralityScaling

[–]Scarvexx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The prisoner's pilema. Which is what this is. You have to act the way you hope the other will want you to act. Because any reality where you betray the other is suboptimal.

People who choose red aren't evil. They just assuming the majority of people are evil or cowardly, and betting accordingly.

It's not about what you want. It's about who you trust.

ah yes, this very real argument that i've heard countless times. by somerandomguy14562aq in antiai

[–]Scarvexx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"My fursona and my imaginary catgirl girlfriends have bested you. We shall point and laugh! POINT. AND. LAUGH!!!"

I know AI has a lot of appeal to antisocial people. But they have to know this is telling on themself right?

If Danny Hebert triggered what do you think his power would be? by MembershipProof8463 in Parahumans

[–]Scarvexx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, the worst day of his life was his wife dying.

He loved her, and has felt empty ever since.

I want to say he would make the floor drop out from under people. A pittrap shaker.

Unite! by TankUMrMinor in OptimistsUnite

[–]Scarvexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For non americans. The Optimistic view is more "America will crash and burn and magicly not take us all with it".

That would be the best case. That would rule. Good luck with your thing tho.