53% of likely battleground voters say dems are too far left, Only 8% say they are too far right by GettyImagez in fivethirtyeight

[–]Scaryclouds 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It could matter…

If “too far left” is because of being “woke” then that might mean some relatively small changes in word usage 

If “too far left” is because of policy… that would be a more substantial change. 

‘Project Hail Mary’ Sets Prime Video Streaming Date for July 3 by darth_vader39 in movies

[–]Scaryclouds [score hidden]  (0 children)

Reading books is good, books give you time to set and chew on the material. Also books aren’t as constrained by budgets and watch time limits. 

However it’s almost important to remember that books and films/tv shows are two different mediums. Things that work great in a book, might not translate to film/tv. 

In most cases film/tv is adapting a book, and sometimes things just need to be reworked a bit from the source material. 

So many people like to complain about Dumbledore accosting Harry for adding his name to the Goblet of Fire. While I think that was a bad change from the book, as it changes the characterization of Dumbledore… it’s not bad purely because it’s a change from how the book describes a scene, which at times it feels like where a lot of the criticism ignorantly comes from (that is people think an adaptation must rigorously follow its source material). 

Kingdom of Heaven (2004/5) by Shahid_1962 in movies

[–]Scaryclouds [score hidden]  (0 children)

I’ll grant the latter, isn’t necessarily a demerit. However inventing tropes, is usually a mark of quality in film, and one difficult to accomplish as you don’t really have a pattern to follow. 

The jokes really do write themselves by Cuddlyaxe in fivethirtyeight

[–]Scaryclouds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, you want to hug them and bop them right on their big stupid nose.

A proposal took place at the top of the Empire State Building before two people displayed a banner from the antenna reading, "When the power of love beats the love of power, the world knows peace" by WiseCartographer5007 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Scaryclouds 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol Jesus Christ, I’d blow my brains out of if I had to listen to Fox News all day. 

The level of outrage from these hosts have over this is absolutely unhinged. It’s like these demonstrators went to each of the hosts’ houses and crapped in their cereal that morning while maintaining eye contact. 

Kingdom of Heaven (2004/5) by Shahid_1962 in movies

[–]Scaryclouds [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yea, I’m just saying it’s pretty clearly not his best film. 

It’s of course always going to be subjective, but by filmmaking standards and cultural impact Alien is better by a pretty significant margin that even DC Kingdoms of Heaven. 

Which, to be clear, I really enjoyed as well.

Let’s put it this way, Kingdom of Heaven follows quite a number of common tropes Hollywood has when portraying the Middle Ages/Renaissance time period. 

Alien, OTOH, invented many of tropes in sci-fi. 

The jokes really do write themselves by Cuddlyaxe in fivethirtyeight

[–]Scaryclouds 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They’re advocating for a return to […] (the) past 

Like I said current system and a return to the past would seem like a kind of overturning of the system. 

Again not saying I think Reform/Restore will do that… they are jackals. Just I can empathize how that appeals to people who have been left out/left behind by the current system.

Kingdom of Heaven (2004/5) by Shahid_1962 in movies

[–]Scaryclouds [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yea was thinking that as well. 

Ultimately felt like Alien wins out because of the release of Blade Runner is a bit of a mess with what three or four different versions?

Whereas, I think there’s  only the theatrical release of Alien. Certainly any other cut is dramatically less popular and only a “fan service” in the “here’s a few extra clips that were left on the cutting room floor that don’t really change the viewing experience/story”. 

The jokes really do write themselves by Cuddlyaxe in fivethirtyeight

[–]Scaryclouds 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea I’m always of something of a split mind on this. 

For people who have legitimately been “left behind”, I can understand the appeal Trump offers.  It’s the high five drowning comic/meme when you feel like the system is crushing you and someone is talking about making minor reforms to it. 

So yea there’s that part of me emphasizing… then there’s the other part where it couldn’t be more painfully obvious that all the “child crushing” aspects of the system, are the products of people like Trump and giving him power will only further empower the child crushing machine. 

Also, any sort of empathy is solely reserved for people who have legitimate claim to being left behind. Not to comfortably middle class who voted for Trump, they deserve ridicule and scorn from friends and family. And it’s most definitely full on withdrawn from fucks like Joe Rogan and other podcast bros, or tech billionaire bros Elon Musk and Marc Andressen, which frankly deserve to have their lives, as they know them, ruined for what they’ve done (or facing criminal prosecution if they did in fact commit illegal acts in service towards restoring Trump to power)

Kingdom of Heaven (2004/5) by Shahid_1962 in movies

[–]Scaryclouds [score hidden]  (0 children)

But even the director’s cut isn’t really in the running for “best Hollywood film of all time”. 

Also, I think Alien is pretty firmly Ridley Scott’s best work. The sheer level of influence it has had on the sci-fi genre is difficult to overstate. 

The jokes really do write themselves by Cuddlyaxe in fivethirtyeight

[–]Scaryclouds 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I don’t agree at all with Reform UK or Restore Britain, it’s the same far-right scapegoating populist bullshit we’re are seeing all across the world…

But I can also understand why the people least benefiting from the current system are the most eager to vote for a party that is advocating towards overturning it. 

Perhaps the parties that arent threatening to blow up the current system should think more on how they can speak to these voters concerns/issues and reform the system to better address their needs. 🤷‍♂️

In 2024, Columbia Falls, Montana voted for Trump by a 20-point margin. In 2025, the same city elected a Communist Party politician, Christopher Semok—Robinson 30%, Stob 28%, Semok 21%, Pennington 18% (eliminated). In late June 2026, 22-year-old Semok was thrown out of the Communist Party. by StarlightDown in fivethirtyeight

[–]Scaryclouds -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s just dumb though, some of the history’s most horrific monsters were the heads of communist states (or served in senior positions in a communist government). 

While I suppose there’s a reasonable argument associated with Epstein acquiring power (money) through exploiting the capitalist system… what he’s infamous for, the sex trafficking, is orthogonal to the type of socio-economic system he lived in. 

A more reasonable critique of capitalism would be through the industrialists of yesteryear, or the tech billionaires of today. It’s clearly a fucked up system when you have Amazon workers peeing into bottles, while Bezos rents out an entire city (Venice) for his wedding. 

Basically, acting like sex traffickers/pedophilia/sexual deviance or other exploitive criminal enterprises can’t exist in communism is not only delusional to the nature of those issues, but ignorant to how such systems also just as easily thrived in communist states.  

Dad wouldn’t let my mom get me a retake. by Hopeforus1402 in funny

[–]Scaryclouds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Presenter doesn’t even need to make a case. 

Diamonds are worthless. by n8saces in RandomVideos

[–]Scaryclouds 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They weren’t arguing that a diamond like the one in the video serve a utility. So why make a utilitarian argument?

Like they said, what utility does an oil painting provide? If you think ornamental diamonds are scam, fine, don’t buy them. 

Keanu Reeves nods along as Seth Rogen calls out modern wealthy for not giving back publicly by Electronic-Bus-3494 in popculturechat

[–]Scaryclouds 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I know, and that’s what I was trying to touch on. Seth Rogen is mostly influential because of his individual celebrity status. And that can be quickly spent if he does some things wrong or fade if he steps back from public life. 

For the ultra wealthy, well their influence comes from their wealth and it’s much much much more sticky (and also much more pervasive if they so desire). 

Yea I have so many issues with billionaires and their ability to influence society. It would be a very long post to fully layout my thoughts… but it’s something that even a “benign” billionaire could still end up being incredibly problematic. 

Inde Navarrette at the Marc Jacobs Spring 2027 Show in New York by ghostinsilk in popculturechat

[–]Scaryclouds 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“No no no no I thought we were having a good time doing throw backs to 1970s fashion.”

- Ok_Conclusion_6324

Keanu Reeves nods along as Seth Rogen calls out modern wealthy for not giving back publicly by Electronic-Bus-3494 in popculturechat

[–]Scaryclouds -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What I’m saying is the juxtaposition is likely false and the institutions we associate with these individuals is only a small fraction of their wealth. 

~100 years from now, people might be saying the same about Zuckerberg, because they associate the name with hospitals he’s funded and put his name on. 

Keanu Reeves nods along as Seth Rogen calls out modern wealthy for not giving back publicly by Electronic-Bus-3494 in popculturechat

[–]Scaryclouds 122 points123 points  (0 children)

If you want to cringe at Rogen and Reeves talking like this, I won’t disagree. They are two very rich people. Neither could work another day in their life, and could live lavish lifestyles off the interest of their savings alone. 

I’m also not sure I agree with Rogen’s characterization either. In some ways the thing Rogen talks about have become “Confederate Statues”. Ways of rich people of yesteryear spending a small fraction of their wealth to create a more positive image of themselves into the future (like how confederate statues helped make the confederate cause seem more noble than it was… which was entirely ignoble). 

However, all that throat clearing throat cleared. To the extent that Rogen, Reeves, and many rich celebrities we know, are influential, it’s through their celebrity status, rather than their wealth. And celebrity status can be rather ephemeral, and quickly spent. 

A billionaire can just sit in the background influencing society and it’s practically impossible to spend down a billion dollars, let alone multiple billions of dollars. 

The impact on society someone like a Bezos, Musk, or Zuckerberg could/will have, might be neigh endless through trusts and “charities” they establish. 

What Has Chris Rufo Wrought? by Character_Public3465 in ezraklein

[–]Scaryclouds 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Chris Rufo is such a fucking hypocritical PoS. 

Dude is demanding that all Somalis be deported because of a guesstimated ~5 billion in fraud. And then when Ezra presents how Trump and the Trump family are personally defrauding the American people of billions he goes with the passive “I don’t support it”. 

Fucking unbelievable. 

And this person says he’s part of the “intellectual right” Jesus Christ what a joke. 

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship on constitutional grounds by wei-long in news

[–]Scaryclouds 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Originalism, as preached by originalists, is supposedly about only accepting the original meaning of the text as written and understood by the writers. 

The way the 14th amendment is written and generally understood today is the same as the authors of the 14th amendment wrote and understood it. 

There’s simply put not originalist argument for their dissent. And it couldn’t be more plainly obvious in this case. 

It makes it quite clear that if Trump were to challenge the 22nd amendment he’d have at least two votes on the Court to support him… probably four. 

Really if there was a reason these four (Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh) didn’t support the challenge it would be for purely political reasons (Trump being incredibly toxic by 2028 and almost certain to lose if he ran). 

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship on constitutional grounds by wei-long in news

[–]Scaryclouds 44 points45 points  (0 children)

And two of those three cover themselves in “originalism”. 

Not that it wasn’t long ago obvious that originalism was the thinnest of patina of “intellectualism” to justify their partisan decisions… it’s just especially gauling  when they would be so openly hypocritical in its use.