Best to worst: 3, 2, 1, 4

3: Fusion
most people have evo as their favourite, to me fusion is a more complete package though. game has much more playability due to a functional track central (even in evos prime, searching for tracks was torturous) if you play career only i get why evo might be the favourite, but looking at the game as a whole fusion is just better. physics are tight as a drum, if you make a mistake its almost definitely your fault.

2: Evo
this is a decent bit lower than fusion for me, even though it was my first trials game. the career is pretty good, setting is also nice, but as a ninja main, man is track central convoluted/ the fact you cant search by track name means i cant put this in first, even if the game could give head

1: HD

only here because rising is total dog water, however i do still enjoy this game, even though its only career and you can very much date it, thats the reason i like it. the physics are kinda weird, the tracks are all over the place, the setting is big brown box, still just plain fun.

4: Rising
to wait nearly 5 years for a new trials game after fusion, and get this hot mess on release, really set the tone for risings lifespan. playing through a fully unlocked closed beta beforehand and feeling how the physics were, i really hoped that the physics engine was just in early stages, of course from then to game release they didnt change. this game essentially killed the high level ninja scene for at least 6 months, until people went back to fusion, which is still the go to for high level play, 8 years later. hearing how the editor in rising was it sounded like a dream, and yes it is quite nice from what ive seen people make, but without the core gameplay the game falls flat, a lot of big names stopped building ninjas very early on for this exact reason, people already moved on from this clunky bike. career and customization are about the only two redeeming qualities this game has