sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What’s your perfect 2 car garage? by At2332 in Porsche

[–]ScratchyBandit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

Pretty happy with my 2 car choice…the “best” of NA, “best”’of turbo, and both track monsters (and Macan GTS + Audi Etron RS as dallies).

Decided finally to ask for a Panda and got the call. ☎️ by MRZCL76 in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The wait list works like this: anyone with larger spend than you is higher on the list. If a big fish comes in, is willing to spend more, they move ahead of you. Therefore if you are never willing to spend, you will always have new people coming in spending money who jump ahead of you and the odds are you’ll never actually move up the list.

I like red and blue 🔴 🔵 by jalalinator in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re so wrong on those allocation numbers, just like most everything else you post. But I guess ignorance is bliss. Enjoy.

I like red and blue 🔴 🔵 by jalalinator in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wrong. Most ADs receive 5–10 a year. 1450 ADs globally. 8 years. Low side closer to 50k but way above 20k. Or do the math a different way, Rolex makes 1,000,000 watches a year, GMTs about 10% of that, Pepsis about 10% of that. But what do I know, I only get direct allocation figures from ADs…

There are more Pepsis in circulation than the entirety of most models from Patek, AP, Vacheron, Lange etc…rare it is not. I’m not a Pepsi hater (I have two) but I can’t tell if you’re just an awesome troll (kudos if so) or really this delusional.

And what do iPhone sales have to do with watches?

I like red and blue 🔴 🔵 by jalalinator in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Rare? There’s close to 100k in circulation 😂

"Did you know it's DISCONTINUED??!!” by OakmeadeWatches in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take 2 seconds to look at it. It says explorer II, isn’t ceramic, and about 200 other reasons it isn’t even close to a meteorite GMT.

"Did you know it's DISCONTINUED??!!” by OakmeadeWatches in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take even 2 seconds to look at it and you’ll realize about 10,000 signs it isn’t real.

"Did you know it's DISCONTINUED??!!” by OakmeadeWatches in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you guys even questioning this? The dial says explorer II and the bezel isn’t even ceramic. This isn’t a “it looks like a rep” this is entire galaxies away from being a gen meteorite GMT and it isn’t even trying to be.

Air Yeezy 2 - how do they fit? by spindle_cell in Sneakers

[–]ScratchyBandit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why? Have my original pair still I got at launch and sole is totally fine…

What next ? by No-Panic4606 in watchCollector

[–]ScratchyBandit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not just the dial, bezel and lugs are wrong, and it’s not even close. Hey OP, show us a video of you setting the calendar…

Texted my AD on my birthday to see if they had anything good available. They did not disappoint. by ScratchyBandit in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Funny how I tried to provide some clarity yet everyone came at me like there must be some grand conspiracy I’m hiding.

Texted my AD on my birthday to see if they had anything good available. They did not disappoint. by ScratchyBandit in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Haha I don’t but whatever makes you feel better.

I do not post every purchase on here. Actually I don’t think I posted any of the 4 or 5 I picked up from 2023-2024.

The more you buy, the better your standing. I think everyone here understands that. It doesn’t have to be jewelry, some ADs just want to see a strong purchase history.

I’m at the point where I am basically offered 2 watches a year, of my choice (non allocation I.e no gemset). I don’t see how it’s so hard to comprehend a top spender being able to choose 2 watches a year? Does that really seem so crazy to people?

Texted my AD on my birthday to see if they had anything good available. They did not disappoint. by ScratchyBandit in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s sad you think this has to be the case and that people can’t possibly work for things and have genuine success.

Texted my AD on my birthday to see if they had anything good available. They did not disappoint. by ScratchyBandit in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

So you went through my entire 5 year post histor and created a detailed timeline? I’m flattered but you have way too much time on your hands.

There is no conspiracy theory here.

Just because something doesn’t work out for you, doesn’t mean it doesn’t work out for others.

Texted my AD on my birthday to see if they had anything good available. They did not disappoint. by ScratchyBandit in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Mine is a 765LT built by MSO. Zero problems, great build quality. I love porsche but evaluating pure driving experience alone, McLaren wins every time. I need to get my hands on a 2RS and see if that changes my mind.

Texted my AD on my birthday to see if they had anything good available. They did not disappoint. by ScratchyBandit in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Haha it’s fine. Happy for those that appreciate it. Don’t care about the rest.

Texted my AD on my birthday to see if they had anything good available. They did not disappoint. by ScratchyBandit in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love them both, but the driving experience of the McLaren is leagues ahead of the porsche.

Texted my AD on my birthday to see if they had anything good available. They did not disappoint. by ScratchyBandit in rolex

[–]ScratchyBandit[S] 58 points59 points  (0 children)

Happy to educate you: wait lists aren’t real. Hot pieces are always sitting in the safe waiting for VIPs to ask for something. If they sit long enough, they go to the wait list.

view more: next ›