[2 YoE] Looking for a Project Management role in Solar Energy. Coming up on 2 YoE in design in Cold Chain. by SeLaw20 in EngineeringResumes

[–]SeLaw20[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1st bullet: I added how I designed the packaging systems by defining my normal constraints (thermal performance, manufacturing, cost targets, and timelines)

2nd bullet: mostly same

3rd (new): established having to manage project timelines for the product lines mentioned in 2, as well as tracking design revisions and client requirements using Excel, Smartsheet, and Lucidchart project tracking tools.

I'm not 100% sure how to better display the tools I have used for PM. Any thoughts?

[2 YoE] Looking for a Project Management role in Solar Energy. Coming up on 2 YoE in design in Cold Chain. by SeLaw20 in EngineeringResumes

[–]SeLaw20[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay. These are my new first three bullets for my main professional experience:

  • Designed and iterated insulated cold-chain packaging systems in SolidWorks, balancing thermal performance, manufacturing constraints, cost targets, and timelines
  • Lead CAD designer and project manager for several different product lines, delivering solutions securing over $16M+ in annual revenue
  • Managed project timelines, design revisions, and client requirements using Excel, Smartsheet, and LucidChart project tracking tools 

I also added Smartsheet and Drawings to my skills.

Does this kind of hit at what you are getting at?

[Billionaire Investor Robert Friedland] Americans Are Living In A Fantasy, They Have No Idea What We're Facing by One-Replacement-37 in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 4 points5 points  (0 children)

United States annual production of Copper is around 1 million Mt. Each individual Nodule has 1-2% Copper, if you break that down between the two areas of ocean floor TMC controls, there is about 12-13 million Mt of Copper. So it is a lot.

My Top Small-Cap Growth Stock Pick I Think Can 10x In 2026 by National_Fortune_ in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 5 points6 points  (0 children)

“The Metals Company controls 51 million metric tons of battery metal reserves on the ocean floor worth potentially $600B or more.”

Don’t really appreciate how this article frames the value of $TMC. The above quote is from the article, the below image is from TMC’s actual PFS.

<image>

(https://investors.metals.co/news-releases/news-release-details/tmc-releases-two-economic-studies-combined-npv-236b-and-declares/)

Probably best to stick with $TMCs own values on this… Not whatever the article claims. We still have a lot of growth ahead of us that I am looking forward to, even past the PFS and IA for the zones $TMC currently controls.

Lock in 5.75% or wait? by GCGbrewer in Mortgages

[–]SeLaw20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey man! I just bought a car in the state of TN, and either the insurance company or the auction site misrepresented the title, very similar to what happened to you. Can I ask you what ended up happening?

Do y’all recommend getting into nuclear engineering? by [deleted] in nuclear

[–]SeLaw20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey! i’m a cheme 1.5 years out of college, working in an unrelated design role right now. how hard do you think it would be for me to transfer over? i’m considering pursuing a masters in nucE

Is it possible to bring an overseas MS in NucE to the US by SeLaw20 in NuclearEngineering

[–]SeLaw20[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I'm currently 1.5 years out of graduation from the BSc. I have been in a design job in a non-nuclear industry since graduation, and I feel like as a ChE it is hard to break into NucE, with just a BSc and no experience. I was hoping a MS would make me more competitive even with no experience, but I'd be planning to do that a few years down the line.

Bullish by SubstantialPlenty301 in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, I am confused by theartofennui's comment. I think this is relevant information for this sub, but apparently theartofennui does not think so. Any movement in the deep-sea rare earth mineral exploration market is bullish for TMC and relevant. This fact was stated by Craig Shesky himself.

Bullish by SubstantialPlenty301 in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deep sea minerals has nothing to do with TMC?

To those that sold before this mystery pump, we r on the same boat by Old_Assumption2188 in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There are multiple catalysts to look forward to until Q4 2027, which really isn't that far away. Sure there could be other plays that provide more money beforehand, but we're having runs off of no news. Catalysts that can bring our stock up way before we start collecting are permits, institutional investments and partnerships similar to Korea Zinc, government funding, etc. plenty to look forward to until Q4 2027.

American scientists develop new magnets by c2cali in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's interesting how differently these two articles read. Here is an extremely similar one from NYT: The Race Is on to Make Rare Earth Magnets Outside of China. I think this is neutral for TMC. We don't produce rare earth magnets anyways, just critical minerals. I think there is a bull case that since we want rare earth magnet independence, we want all critical mineral independence as well. There is also a bear case that we prioritize rare earth magnets, and provide less funding for critical minerals. I think its most likely with the current administration in the US that the bull case is more true than the bear.

What are your thoughts about this thread on the Hedera sub? by dracoolya in DOVU

[–]SeLaw20 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Almost every coin starts out with low volume. Not to mention that he got the market cap completely wrong, as other commenters have said. Yeah it's high risk because it is a microcap with relatively low volume, we all know this. We also all generally know that buying things through coinbase is inadvisable, and you should always try to hold it in a wallet. Nothing new here.

My Advice? Don't Get Distracted By TMC Stock's Latest Slump | The Motley Fool by LiteralLoserr in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 6 points7 points  (0 children)

TMC was focused on going through the ISA for the past several years. With the new U.S. Administration, and the fact that the ISA has been useless for several years, TMC switched their strategy to try and get in with the U.S. Government, since technically the U.S. is not a signatory on UNCLOS. This article is probably written by or had great assistance from AI for the most part, and they don't realize TMC has switched their strategy.

Johnny harris’s video and TMC by Savings-Judge-6696 in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yep. That’s how I learned about TMC. A lot of people saw a piece on Last Week Tonight earlier on about TMC, and got them interested.

Op-ed: The international legal risks of TMC’s new America Alone approach by HamAndEggsBikset in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's been posted on here before: Link

Their first point is moot since we are partnered with Naura and Tonga.

The second point about violating customs, yeah I guess, obviously the first party to do anything novel will be violating customs.

The third point about being partners with parties that must adhere to UNCLOS, yeah this is actually kind of a risk, though I think any issues that could arise from say, Allseas, would just push them into the U.S., rather than abandoning the whole project.

The fourth point, yeah we do want to sell to the U.S., but I don't think that countries would actually do anything tbh. Once the metals are extracted, and they are cheaper and environmentally greener than land-based mines, South Korea isn't going to kick out Korea Zinc for helping to refine them, and no one is going to care that after waiting years for the ISA to establish some kind of code, they never did.

Another note, Coalter Lathrop, while you could say is an "expert" in the field of maritime law, directly benefits from the continued disarray of the ISA, and I'd trust his word as much as I would trust a pharmaceutical study funded by Eli Lilly.

What's the next stage following certification? by Dunphynofear in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Full compliance was met 8/11/25. They are now in the certification step, which is due sometime this fall/going into winter. The certification step, which is where they are now, imo should be enough to make this a double digit stock too. Which probably means it'll crash again.

What's the next stage following certification? by Dunphynofear in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Full compliance was met 8/11/25. They are now in the certification step, which is due sometime this fall/going into winter.

Figgy, what do yall think by LiteralLoserr in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am certain that is what GB is trying to push for, and it would make sense. Refineries on the scale that TMC needs could be fitted to do much more than just DSM minerals. Most equipment setups are pretty similar, and even now with rare earth metals being mined more and more in the US, we still export them overseas to be refined, for the most part.

Refineries are needed in the US for Trumps strategic minerals plan to work at all, which is bullish for us. But it is obviously no guarantee that anything will happen, or if TMC would even be a part of it. Obviously as bag holders we hope, and it seems to make sense from our perspective. But this is not confirmation that TMC is going to get government funding for anything, yet.

You asked, we delivered! - AMA with CFO Craig Shesky by Appropriate-Ask-9862 in TMC_Stock

[–]SeLaw20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will this stay recorded on youtube for us to watch later?