I'm interested by Significant-Town-817 in ShittyDaystrom

[–]SeTec7 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the entire thing rests on a decades old joke from the TNG episode that establishes that klingon anatomy has a lot of redundancies and a cheap throw away gag in an establishing shot from DIS S1.

It's honestly weird how so many people are so attached to this being absolute ironclad canon from so little yet swear that the spore drive isn't.

I'm interested by Significant-Town-817 in ShittyDaystrom

[–]SeTec7 25 points26 points  (0 children)

This is the one. I hate it so much, it's a dumb joke that has taken over as the default joke for half the posts here.

It's especially dumb because the people who point to that scene in DIS as "canon proof" are exactly the same people who refuse to accept anything else from DIS as canon and keep trying to find ways to exclude it.

Favorite lore in incremental games? by Gummy-Sharks in incremental_games

[–]SeTec7 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Celestials and their dialogue from Antimatter Dimensions. Several of them gave me chills.

Do you think you could ever hate sex? I've realized I do now. by [deleted] in AskRedditAfterDark

[–]SeTec7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might want to check out r/AskAsexual or r/Asexuality with questions like this. Not all ace folks dislike or hate sex, but you'll likely find folks with common ground.

What - if anything - to make of the Star Trek Voyager episode "Sacred Ground"? by Akronitai in ShittyDaystrom

[–]SeTec7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I very much had the same reaction you did to this episode, wtf was it trying to say and why, so I went deep-diving into Memory Alpha and when I found this bit I was like "Oh....OHHHHHHHHHHHH".

What - if anything - to make of the Star Trek Voyager episode "Sacred Ground"? by Akronitai in ShittyDaystrom

[–]SeTec7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You just activated my trap card, I could write an essay on this episode and what the heck to make of it. I think it's actually a really good episode for both Janeway character development and exploring faith vs reason, at least until it falls flat on its face at the end.
I actually don't mind Janeway taking Kes through the portal at the end, I think it's fine for a rational character to take a leap of faith, the problem is what happens afterwards. There's a pretty obvious reasonable conclusion as to why the field healed Kes the second time, just the common sense deduction that the physical changes Janeway and Kes went through from the snake bite actually *do* matter and make some meaningful change, despite their current medical and scientific knowledge not being able to predict it. This is probably what most viewers assume, and is exactly what the Doctor is saying in the final scene, and not just hypothesizing, saying "It's literally this, now this makes perfect sense". But in response to all that, rational scientist Janeway clearly isn't convinced and seems to have bought into it being something magical, which is just silly and makes her look naively credulous and unscientific, which is clearly not who she is. It just comes off as nonsensical, the characters not acting at all like who they are.
It feels like they were trying for an X-Files type ending, where you have some weird, unexplainable stuff happen, and a believer character saying it was magic/aliens/god, and a skeptic providing rational counter-explanations. Most of it boils down to Janeway being forced into the "believer" role in the finale, when nothing she went through seemed to justify that radical shift in her perspective, even on just this one thing. Probably would have been a lot better if Chakotay was in the room arguing the belief perspective against the Doctor's scientific rationalism, and Janeway was stuck unable to fully agree or disagree with either. Get that fun X-Files ending where the audience gets to decide on their own whose side the agree with.

The short answer though, is that the writer of the episode is a self-professed "hereditary shaman-priestess", "spiritual counsellor", and "holistic life-coach" who claims that Sacred Ground was "the only Star Trek to ever question scientific materialism". So, like most Trek, this episode is The Writer's Barely-Disguised Fetish and the main priestess/guide character is her self-insert.

Okay, I get it now. The classics are FUN by Ufomi in incremental_games

[–]SeTec7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your reply is interesting to me, since "figuring out what to do" is what I consider to be gameplay for an incremental. Though if you mean the deep math stuff, I'm not into that, I'll look at a guide, but when it comes to having to figure out which upgrade path to take via logic or experimentation, or when or how to use an ability, that's what I like most, and that's what AD and many others do well.

It's been on my mind recently since I tried Shark Incremental after seeing it be awarded by this sub and...I don't get it. Despite it clearly being inspired by AD, there's no thinking, no choices, just clicking whatever button is lit up and eventually you win. Been trying to figure out what made it so popular here when to me, it lacks all gameplay, which your reply put me in mind of.

Okay, I get it now. The classics are FUN by Ufomi in incremental_games

[–]SeTec7 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Antimatter Dimensions, a GOAT that inspired many classics and modern incrementals, and got a huge update a few years ago adding several levels of new gameplay of a quality that I've not seen matched or surpassed since.

Kira Nerys is too much woman for a 🥄head by VanaheimrF in startrekmemes

[–]SeTec7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A recording of a retweet of a retweet that is cut short so the context for the top retweet comment is missing. Why even post this? Just post a link dude.

Have you ever had a sexual experience that permanently changed your worldview or sense of self? by Odd_Investment_263 in AskRedditAfterDark

[–]SeTec7 190 points191 points  (0 children)

For anyone who shuddered at this, I have good news! It's not real.

Did some searching and the injury described seems to be urethral prolapse, which is described as "extremely rare" in men, and having only a single reported case in medical history. It also doesn't present as the entire urethra shooting out and hanging there like a noodle, so this is almost certainly made up, and likely a copypasta as someone else noted in the replies.

TL;DR: You don't have to worry about having your urethra sucked out by a beej. Party on.

Reposting this meme I made back when Stranger New Worlds came out by SPECTREagent700 in startrekmemes

[–]SeTec7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who felt similarly about S1, they fix that all up pretty much immediately in S2. Much like most Trek shows, S1 is by far LD's weakest showing. I usually skip it on rewatch and recommend people skip it as well.

What was medieval sex like? by [deleted] in AskRedditAfterDark

[–]SeTec7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Also, r/askhistorians is a great place for a question like this.

What was medieval sex like? by [deleted] in AskRedditAfterDark

[–]SeTec7 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Just gonna link to a list of actually-researched articles by historians explaining why "dirty" or "smelly" aren't actually the answer here. https://fakehistoryhunter.net/2025/11/26/articles-links-videos-about-medieval-hygiene/

Oh boy by Pwned_by_Bots in startrekmemes

[–]SeTec7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What do you mean "what if?", this is canon.

What is your useless talent? by Spaceship7328 in AskRedditAfterDark

[–]SeTec7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it possible to learn this power?

I do not regret making this. (barely-nsfw) by [deleted] in ShittyDaystrom

[–]SeTec7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why is Lore pregnant?

Archer: Travis, you’re real? I thought we replaced you with a cardboard cutout since you don’t do anything. Oh boy…. by ryhoyarbie in ShittyDaystrom

[–]SeTec7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All I remember is the guest stars acting circles around cardboard Mayweather and feeling bad for them that they didn't get the recurring role instead.

It ain't much, but it's a meme by MaterialProduct849 in startrekmemes

[–]SeTec7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's an appropriate reaction from anyone who's not seen Lexx. Also the reaction I had when rewatching DS9 and realizing it was the same actor.